Araeoscelidia or Araeoscelida is a clade of extinct tetrapods (traditionally classified as diapsidreptiles) superficially resembling lizards, extending from the Late Carboniferous to the Early Permian.
The group contains the generaAraeoscelis, Petrolacosaurus, the possibly aquatic Spinoaequalis, and less well-known genera such as Kadaliosaurus and Zarcasaurus. This clade has historically been considered to be the sister group to all (currently known) later 'diapsids', though studies from the early 2020s onwards have found as among the earliest (if not the earliest) members of Sauropsida unrelated to neodiapsid reptiles, or even outside Sauropsida entirely, suggesting their physically diapsid skull is unrelated to those of modern diapsids.
Description
Araeoscelidians were small animals (less than one meter in length) looking somewhat like lizards, though they are only distantly related to true lizards. They differ from other, earlier sauropsids by their slender limbs, their elongated tail, and of course by the presence of two temporal openings, the feature defining the diapsid condition, although most recent studies considered this to be only convergent with the condition in neodiapsids. In Araeoscelis, only the upper temporal opening remains, thus resulting in a derived euryapsid condition.
Genera
Araeoscelidia includes well-known genera such as Araeoscelis Williston 1910, Petrolacosaurus Lane 1945 and Spinoaequalis, known from virtually complete skeletons. Zarcasaurus, Aphelosaurus and Kadaliosaurus belong to this clade but are known only from post-cranial remains and a mandible fragment for Zarcasaurus.
The genus Dictybolos has been included in Araeoscelidia by Olson (1970) but this inclusion has been criticized e.g., by Evans (1988), especially since Olson also included distantly related groups such as protorosaurs and mesosaurs.
New specimens have been discovered in the United States state of Oklahoma, but lack a scientific description as of 2023.
Phylogeny
The majority of historical phylogenetic studies recovered araeoscelidians as the most basal group of diapsids, however this has recently been challenged, and it has been suggested that the araeoscelidians convergently evolved their diapsid condition separately from those of other diapsids (Neodiapsida).
Cladogram after Bickelmann et al., 2009 and Reisz et al., 2011, showing classical position of Araeoscelidia at the base of Diapsida sister to Neodiapsida:
However, Simões et al. (2022) recover them as stem-amniotes instead, as the sister group to the clade including Captorhinidae and Protorothyris archeri.
Cladogram of Reptilia after Jenkins et al 2025, which found Araeoscelidia as the most basal group of sauropsids, a placement found by later versions of this dataset as well as studies by Buffa et al:
Araeoscelidia are known from the Late Carboniferous in the United States (Petrolacosaurus, Spinoaequalis) to the Early Permian in France (Aphelosaurus), Germany (Kadaliosaurus) and the United States (Dictybolos, Zarcasaurus, Araeoscelis, Halgaitosaurus). Apart from araeoscelidans, only one other anatomical diapsid is known before the Late Permian: Orovenator from the Early Permian of Oklahoma.
↑Bickelmann, Constanze; Müller, Johannes; and Reisz, Robert R. (2009). "The enigmatic diapsid Acerosodontosaurus piveteaui (Reptilia: Neodiapsida) from the Upper Permian of Madagascar and the paraphyly of younginiform reptiles". Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences. 49 (9): 651–661. Bibcode:2009CaJES..46..651S. doi:10.1139/E09-038.
↑Buffa, Valentin; Jenkins, Xavier A.; Benoit, Julien (2025-12-31). "Galesphyrus capensis from the Permian of South Africa and the origin of Neodiapsida". Journal of Systematic Palaeontology. 23 (1) 2563582. doi:10.1080/14772019.2025.2563582. ISSN1477-2019.
Credner, H. (1889). "Die Stegocephalen und Saurier aus dem Rothliegenden des Plauen'schen Grundes bei Dresden. 8 – Kadaliosaurus priscus Cred". Zeitschrift der Deutschen Geologischen Gesellschaft. 41: 319–342.
Evans, S. E. (1988). "The early history and relationships of the Diapsida". In Benton, M. J. (ed.). The phylogeny and classification of the tetrapods. Vol.1: Amphibians, Reptiles, Birds. Systematics Association Special Volume 35 A. Oxford: Clarendon Press. pp.221–260. ISBN0-19-857705-2.
Falconnet, J. & Steyer, J.-S. (2007). "Revision, osteology and locomotion of Aphelosaurus, an enigmatic reptile from the Lower Permian of France". Journal of Morphology (abstract of the 8th International Congress of Vertebrate Morphology, Paris, July 2007): 38.
Gervais, P. (1859). Zoologie et paléontologie française (2nded.). Paris: Bertrand.
Laurin, M. (1991). "The osteology of a Lower Permian eosuchian from Texas and a review of a diapsid phylogeny". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 101: 59–95. doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.1991.tb00886.x.
May, W. J. & Hall, J. D. (2002). "Geology and vertebrate fauna of a new site in the Wellington Formation (Lower Permian) of Northern Oklahoma". Oklahoma Geology Notes. 62 (2): 63–66.
Olson, E. C. (1970). "New and little known genera and species of vertebrates from the Lower Permian of Oklahoma". Fieldiana: Geology. 18: 359–434.
Peabody, F. E. (1952). "Petrolacosaurus kansensis Lane, a Pennsylvanian reptile from Kansas". University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions. 10: 1–41. hdl:1808/3785.
Reisz, R. R.; Berman, D. S. & Scott, D. (1984). "The anatomy and relationships of the Lower Permian reptile Araeoscelis". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 4 (1): 57–67. doi:10.1080/02724634.1984.10011986.