Castle Bank

Castle Bank
Stratigraphic range: Middle Ordovician
~462 Ma
The locality and stratigraphy of Castle Bank within the Builth–Llandrindod Inlier of Powys, Wales
TypeFormation
Unit ofGilwern Volcanic Formation
Thickness10 m (33 ft)
Lithology
PrimarySiltstone
OtherPyroclastic rock, Tuff
Location
Coordinates52°15′N 3°23′W / 52.25°N 3.38°W / 52.25; -3.38
RegionPowys
CountryWales
Type section
Named forCastle Bank Quarry
Named byBotting et al.
Year defined2023

Castle Bank is a Middle Ordovician aged fossiliferous deposit, which is found outcropping within the Gilwern Volcanic Formation of the wider Builth Volcanic Group, near to Llandrindod Wells in Mid Wales. Considered to be a Konservat-Lagerstätte, it contains an abundance of Burgess Shale-type fauna, such as the opabiniid-like panarthropod Mieridduryn bonniae. In other areas of the locality, there is also a notably large collection of sponges from ascospongids, hexactinellids to reticulosans.

History of research

Prior to the formal description of the main locality, the Castle Bank site had been discovered by palaeontologists Joe Botting and Lucy Muir sometime during 2013, although at the time they deemed the site uninteresting, and thus left it. In 2015, they would publish a paper on fossil sponge communities in the Ordovician rocks of the Builth Inlier they had been collecting and studying for 15 years, in which they note that they had found an interesting sponge bed within the Castle Bank site, which contained a notably high number of protomonaxonid sponges, which prompted them to undertake further collections from this new sponge locality at Castle Bank, yielding even more material such as hexactinellid and reticulosan sponges, and which saw the proposed replacement of Protomonaxonida with the new class Ascospongiae.

It wouldn't be until 2020 when they returned to the main locality itself, primarily due to the fact that they could no longer travel to Cardiff were they worked at the Amgueddfa Cymru – Museum Wales as honorary research fellows with the onset of the COVID-19 lockdowns, and the fact it was relatively close to where they lived in the town of Llandrindod Wells. Upon closer inspection, they realised that a small area of the site contained an abundance of fossil material, although this material was far too small for them to properly study. The owners of the farm which the site was found within suggested to Dr. Botting and Muir that they should crowdfund some instruments to permit them to study said material, which they did successfully. With this, during the period between 2020 and 2023, Dr. Botting and Muir, as well as researchers coming in from the Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (NIGPAS) to help, would recover over 170 species, most of which are new to science. The site itself would be formally described and named in 2023, taking its name from Castle Bank Quarry, which it is found outcropping in.

Whilst the collection of new fossil material continues, various new fossil genera have been slowly described from the locality, such as the opabiniid-like panarthropod Mieridduryn bonniae in 2022 prior to the naming of the locality, alongside the bivalved arthropods Ffabach and Gloynia in 2026.

Geology

The Castle Bank site can be found outcropping in the upper layers of the graptolitic siltstone Gilwern Volcanic Formation, near to Llandrindod Wells in Mid Wales, which itself is a part of the wider Builth Volcanic Group. The site itself is predominately composed of inter-bedded siltstones, with substantial deposits of pyroclastic volcanic rock alongside ash laminae, all of which is capped by a 2 m (6.6 ft) layer of tuffaceous rocks, with the overall known thickness of the locality coming in at 10 m (33 ft). The fossil-bearing layers of the site are restricted to a 2 m (6.6 ft) thick interval of siltstone and ash laminae, with the most abundant fossils being found within a thin 20 cm (8 in) coarse-grained silt sequence in the middle of this interval.

The environment of the Castle Bank site at the time of its deposition was likely an open-marine environment along a volcanic island complex, on what was then the microcontinent of Avalonia, which was at the time occupying the temperate southern latitudes of the Middle Ordovician.

Dating

The Castle Bank site has been dated using the notably abundant graptolite fossils, namely of Didymograptus murchisoni and D. foliaceus. This would see the locality placed in the Middle Ordovician Didymograptus murchisoni Biozone, which would thus lithostratigraphically place the deposition of the rocks at the top of this biozone, around 462 Ma.

Taphonomy

The soft tissue of fossils within Castle Bank are preserved as carbonaceous compressions in the rock, which are usually brown in colouration, and have a fine level of detail, preserving delicate labile tissues and details as small as 10 μm (0.00039 in). The rocks of the locality have been heavily metamorphosed, and exposed layers deeply weathered, resulting in the colouration of the fossils not being as striking as fossils seen in the Chenjiang and Fezouata biotas. The spicules of fossil sponges here are commonly preserved as moulds either within a dark brown to pale brown weathering carbonaceous material, or brown probable iron-oxide replacements of pyrite. Some spicules have also been found with this pyrite still within them if they are in indurated sediments. Spicules can commonly be obscured by preserved soft tissue, rarely showing any sharp details as a result.

Paleobiota

A selection of bivalved arthropods from the Castle Bank Lagerstätte

The Castle Bank site contains a wealth of Burgess Shale-type fauna, rivalling even the best Cambrian deposits in the shear abundance and preservation of fossils, as well as showing major changes that occurred ecologically. The fossils themselves are preserved as carbonaceous remains, with a majority of them being notably small in size, ranging from just 1–5 mm (0–0 in) in most cases, excluding fragments of trilobites and centimetre large sponges. The small size of the fossils may be a result of the miniaturisation of organisms in order to be able to make use of equally small benthic organisms as shelter from larger animals, and thus showing that the transition to small and meiofaunal life habits likely began sometime during the Middle Ordovician and the Great Ordovician Biodiversification Event, filling in a notable gap between the Cambrian fauna and the later Ordovician faunas. The site has thus been noted to be highly important by Dr. Botting and Muir, as well as many other researchers in the field, potentially to a similar level of importance as the Burgess Shale in Canada.

The biota itself is predominately composed of arthropods, such as the opabiniid-like Mieridduryn bonniae, alongside a myriad of bivalved arthropods such as Caryocaris, Bullaeferum, and Ffabach. The locality also contains a large collection of sponges, something noted to be a common feature in Burgess-shale Type Faunas, such as Choiaella, Nectocollare, Teganiella, and a myriad of undescribed sponges, which are the main dominate fossils of this locality alongside graptolites, suggesting a survival of sponges in Castle Bank that were unable to compete with the increasingly advanced sponges of the Ordovician.

Color key
Taxon Reclassified taxon Taxon falsely reported as present Dubious taxon or junior synonym Ichnotaxon Ootaxon Morphotaxon

Notes
Uncertain or tentative taxa are in small text
crossed out taxa are discredited.

Arthropoda

Arthropoda
Genus Species Notes Images
Mieridduryn
  • M. bonniae
Opabiniid-like arthropod, likely expending the temporal range of the opabiniids into the Ordovician.
Ogyginus
  • O. corndensis
Asaphid trilobite. Only known from the sponge locality.
Caryocaris
  • Caryocaris sp.
Caryocaridid arthropod. Lack of diagnostic features precludes species level assignment, though it is noted to likely be C. wrightii. The singular specimen was also found long before any other material was found from here, and also has an arrow scratched into the carapace.
Ivocaris (?)
  • Ivocaris (?) sp.
Caryocaridid arthropod. Poor preservation precludes species level assignment, and makes the genus level assignment tentative. If the genus level assignment can be further confirmed with better material, this would extend the geographical range of Ivocaris.
Bullaeferum
  • B. llandeiloensis
Bolliid podocope.
Laterophores
  • Laterophores sp.
Bolliid podocope.
Pariconchoprimitia
  • Pariconchoprimitia sp.
Aechminid podocope.
Gloynia
  • G. jonesi
Bivalved arthropod of uncertain affinities.
Ffabach
  • F. peryglus
Bivalved arthropod of uncertain affinities.

Hemichordata

Hemichordata
Genus Species Notes Images
Didymograptus
  • D. murchisoni
  • D. foliaceus
Didymograptid graptolite, the fossils of which have seen the locality dated to the Middle Ordovician within the Didymograptus murchisoni Biozone.
Dictyonema
  • Dictyonema sp.
Callograptid graptolite, with one specimen containing a preserved zooid.

Annelida

Annelida
Genus Species Notes Images
Llwygarua
  • L. suzannae
Thalassematid annelid.

Lophotrochozoa

Lophotrochozoa
Genus Species Notes Images
Apatobolus
  • A. micula
Obolid brachiopod.
Monobolina
  • M. ramsayi
Brachiopod.
Schizocrania
  • S. multistriata
Trematid brachiopod.

Cnidaria

Cnidaria
Genus Species Notes Images
Sphenothallus
  • Sphenothallus sp.
Conulariid cnidarian.
Paraconularia
  • Paraconularia sp.
Conulariid cnidarian.

Porifera (Sponges)

Porifera
Genus Species Notes Images
Capsospongia (?)
  • Capsospongia (?) sp.
Anthaspidellid sponge.
Choiaella
  • C. hexactinophora
Ascospongid sponge. Species showed that choiid sponges contained hexactins, something previously only known to the hexactinellids, thus seeing a proposal to replace the order Protomonaxonida with the new class Ascospongiae.
Coniculospongia
  • Coniculospongia sp.
Sponge.
Cyathophycus
  • Cyathophycus sp.
Reticulosan sponge.
Halichondrites
  • Halichondrites sp.
Halichondritid sponge.
Specimen of Halicondrites at the Naturhistorisches Museum
Hamptonia
  • Hamptonia sp.
Hamptoniid sponge.
Hazelia from the Maotianshan Shales
Hazelia
  • Hazelia aff. H. luteria
Hazeliid ponge.
Hazelia from the Burgess Shale
Sentinelia (?)
  • Sentinelia (?) sp.
Sponge.
Teganiella
  • Teganiella sp.
Hexactinellid sponge, first record outside of the Americas.
Teganium
  • T. avalonensis
  • Teganium sp.
Hexactinellid sponge.
Nectocollare
  • N. zakdoueli
Amphidiscophoran sponge, with probable affinities to the hexactinellids.
Vauxia (?)
  • Vauxia (?) cf. V. venata
Vauxiid sponge.
Vauxia from the Burgess Shale
cf. Valospongia
  • cf. Valospongia sp.
Sponge.
Xylochos
  • Xylochos sp.
Sponge.

Microorganisms

Microorganisms
Genus Species Notes Images
Filisphaeridium
  • Filisphaeridium sp.
Acritarch.
Leiosphaeridia
  • Leiosphaeridia sp.
Acritarch.

Undescribed

Undescribed
Genus Species Notes Images
Conulariid-like fossil (NMW.2021.3 G.93)
  • ???
A fossil with a similar appearance to the Conulariida.
Unidentified acrotretid brachiopod (NMW.2021.3 G.90)
  • ???
An unidentified acrotretid brachiopod.
Undescribed fenestellid bryozoan (NMW.2021.3 G.62)
  • ???
An undescribed fenestellid bryozoan, found attached to a poorly preserved orthocone nautiloid.
Probable sipunculan-like worm (NMW.2021.3 G.84)
  • ???
An worm-like fossil, which bears similarities to the sipunculans.
Probable priapulid-like worm (NIGP175887)
  • ???
An worm-like fossil, which bears similarities to the priapulids.
Unidentified spinose worm (NMW.2021.3 G.94)
  • ???
A spinose worm of uncertain affinities with a complex jaw apparatus.
Probable priapulid worm (NMW.2021.3 G.97)
  • ???
A probable priapulid worm.
Archaeopriapulid worm (NMW.2021.3 G.19)
  • ???
An Archaeopriapulid worm with a complex proboscis.
Kinorhynch-like worm fossils
  • ???
An myriad of worm fossils, bearing similarities to the Kinorhynch.
Palaeoscolecid worm with transverse plates (NMW.2021.3 G.88)
  • ???
A Palaeoscolecid worm, with transverse rows of large plates.
Palaeoscolecid worm with minute plates (NMW.2021.3 G.89)
  • ???
A Palaeoscolecid worm, with notably minute plates.
Hexpod-like arthropod (NMW.2021.3 G.11)
  • ???
An arthropod fossil, which bears features similar to the Hexapoda.
Yohoiid-like arthropod (NMW.2021.3 G.83)
  • ???
An arthropod fossil, which bears similarities to the yohoiids.
Unidentified arthropod (NMW.2021.3 G.34i)
  • ???
Unidentified arthropod, which has a bilobed tail fan, alongside a head-region preserving preserving eyes and presumed neural tissue.
Stem-group xiphosuran (NMW.2021.3 G.9)
  • ???
Stem-group xiphosuran.
Cephalocarid-like arthropod (NMW.2021.3 G.14)
  • ???
An arthropod fossil, which bears features similar to the cephalocarids.
Undetermined podocope ostracode A (NMW.2021.3G.162)
  • ???
Undetermined podocope.
New bivalved euarthropod (NMW.2021.3G.162)
  • ???
A new bivalved euarthropod, poor preservation precludes formal description and naming.
Undetermined bivalved arthropod A - I
  • ???
Multiple undetermined bivalved arthropods.
Undetermined bivalved carapaces without spines
  • ???
Multiple undetermined bivalved arthropods without spines.
Barnacle-like fossil (NMW.2021.3 G.66)
  • ???
An arthropod fossil, which bears features similar to barnacles.
Small complex Hexactinellid sponge (NMW.2021.3 G.35)
  • ???
A small, complex Hexactinellid sponge of uncertain affinities.
Complex Hexactinellid sponge (NMW.2021.3 G.40)
  • ???
A complex Hexactinellid sponge of uncertain affinities.
Cylindrical Hexactinellid sponge (NIGP175889)
  • ???
A tall, cylindrical Hexactinellid sponge of uncertain affinities.
Complex conico-cylindrical Hexactinellid sponge (NIGP175889)
  • ???
A complex, conico-cylindrical Hexactinellid sponge of uncertain affinities.
Rossellid-like sponge (NMW.2021.3 G.39ii)
  • ???
Rossellid-like sponge.
Stalked ascosponge (NIGP175889)
  • ???
A stalked ascosponge.
Conical ascosponge (NMW.2021.3 G.39i)
  • ???
A small, conical ascosponge.
Piraniidae
  • ???
Piraniid sponge.
Leptomitidae B
  • ???
Leptomitid sponge.
Musaspongiidae (?)
  • ???
Probable Musaspongiid sponge.
undescribed ascospongids I-Q
  • ???
Various ascospongid sponges. Previously recorded as protomonaxonids prior to the erection of the replacement class Ascospongiae.
undescribed reticulosans AI-AL
  • ???
Various reticulosan sponges.
Multi-branch graptolite (NMW.2021.3 G.43)
  • ???
A multi-branched, benthic graptolite.
Lophophore-bearing hemichordate (NMW.2021.3 G.44)
  • ???
A hemichordate with a notable lophophore.
Dendrocystites-like solutans (NMW.2021.3 G.45)
  • ???
Two Dendrocystites-like solutan fossils.
Undescribed Asterozoan (NMW.2021.3 G.67)
  • ???
A complete asterozoan fossil.
Conodont fossils
  • ???
A myriad of conodont fossils.
Tubicolous problematic fossil (NIGP175892)
  • ???
A tubicolous fossil of problematic affinities.
Inocladus-like fossil (NMW.2021.3 G.86)
  • ???
A frondose fossil, which bears similarities to the dasycladacean algae Inocladus.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 Botting, Joseph P.; Muir, Lucy A.; Pates, Stephen; McCobb, Lucy M. E.; Wallet, Elise; Willman, Sebastian; Zhang, Yuandong; Ma, Junye (1 May 2023). "A Middle Ordovician Burgess Shale-type fauna from Castle Bank, Wales (UK)". Nature. 7 (?). Nature Portfolio: 666–674. doi:10.1038/s41559-023-02038-4. PMID 37127766. S2CID 258438453. Retrieved 4 May 2023.
  2. ↑ Tamisiea, Jack, 462-Million-Year-Old Fossil Trove Holds Miniature World of Marine Creatures, Scientific American, May 10, 2023
  3. 1 2 3 Pennisi, Elizabeth (1 May 2023). "Fossil-rich Welsh quarry yields trove of soft-bodied animals at dawn of modern life". www.science.org. Retrieved 30 September 2026.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Muir, Lucy A.; Botting, Joseph P. (March 2015). "An outline of the distribution and diversity of Porifera in the Ordovician Builth Inlier (Wales, UK)". Palaeoworld. 24 (1–2): 176–190. doi:10.1016/j.palwor.2014.11.003.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Botting, J.P. (4 July 2021). "Hexactins in the ‘protomonaxonid’ sponge Choiaella and proposal of Ascospongiae (class nov.) asa formal replacement for the Protomonaxonida". Bulletin of Geosciences: 265–277. doi:10.3140/bull.geosci.1823.
  6. 1 2 "Middle Ordovician 'marine dwarf world' found in Castle Bank, Wales". Phys.org. 1 May 2023. Retrieved 4 May 2023.
  7. 1 2 Pates, S.; Botting, J. P.; Muir, L. A.; Wolfe, J. M. (2022). "Ordovician opabiniid-like animals and the role of the proboscis in euarthropod head evolution". Nature Communications. 13 (1). 6969. Bibcode:2022NatCo..13.6969P. doi:10.1038/s41467-022-34204-w. PMC 9666559. PMID 36379946.
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Pates, Stephen; Botting, Joseph P.; Campbell, Macy W.; Muir, Lucy A. (September 2026). "The diverse bivalved arthropods of Castle Bank (Darriwilian, Ordovician), Wales". Papers in Palaeontology. 12 (5). doi:10.1002/spp2.70128.
  9. 1 2 Prostak, Sergio (3 May 2023). "Ordovician-Period Fossil Site Discovered in Wales | Sci.News". Sci.News: Breaking Science News.
  10. ↑ Minchin, Rod (1 May 2023). "One of the world's greatest fossil finds made in Wales". The Independent.
  11. 1 2 Botting, Joseph P.; Ma, Jun-Ye (December 2022). "A probable hyalonematid sponge (Hexactinellida: Amphidiscophora) from the Middle Ordovician of the Builth Inlier, Wales". Palaeoworld. 31 (4): 621–632. doi:10.1016/j.palwor.2022.01.011.
  12. ↑ Botting, Joseph; Muir, Lucy (2023). "Echiuran worms from the Middle Ordovician Castle Bank Biota of Wales, UK". Acta Palaeontologica Polonica. 68. doi:10.4202/app.01107.2023.
  13. ↑ Botting, Joseph; Muir, Lucy; Ma, Junye (2023). "Teganium (Porifera, Hexactinellida) from the Middle Ordovician Castle Bank fauna of Avalonia (Wales, UK)". Palaeontologia Electronica. doi:10.26879/1247.