Ansell began his career in 1979 when he started working as a research analyst in the Oceans and Environment Program for the US Congress'sOffice of Technology Assessment, where he worked until 1984. After completing his Ph.D. at the University of Chicago, he joined the University of California, Berkeley, initially as an assistant professor in 1993, before becoming an associate professor in 2000, and has been working as a professor of Political Science since 2011. At UC Berkeley, He was the director of the Travers Program on Ethics and Accountability in Government from 2007 to 2013 and chair of the Charles and Louise Travers Department of Political Science from 2018 to 2021.
Research
Ansell's research explored collaborative governance and its applications, particularly the management of public resources and the role of dialogic processes in understanding the problems being faced, and has further proposed models of collaborative governance, particularly the contingency model which identifies conditions which lead to successful or unsuccessful collaboration. He emphasized pragmatism as a productive method in problem-solving. Along with Miura, he discussed government platforms and highlighted the role of new technologies in citizen participation. He developed the idea of co-creation as an emerging paradigm in public administration and linked collaborative governance to the innovation process within public institutions. In his later research, he has explored robust governance which combines adaptation flexibility and proactive innovation to constructively solve crisis-induced turbulence.
Works
In one of his earliest works, with his dissertation advisor John F. Padgett, Ansell analyzed how the Medici family used social networks to rise to power. In other papers, he has discussed "network polity", and represented it using the example of regional development strategies in the EU.
Ansell's book Schism and Solidarity in Social Movements: the Politics of Labor in the French Third Republic, discussed the historical development of the Third Republic French labour movement and aimed to understand schism and solidarity in social movements. Christopher Johnson commented on his use of the French Labor Movement as a "laboratory" and emphasized his "contribution to organizational theory".
Ansell authored the book, Pragmatist Democracy: Evolutionary Learning as Public Philosophy, in which he proposed a new "problem-solving democracy" where the public is actively involved in solving issues of public policy. He used a pragmatist, evolutionary-learning perspective to support his view. Peyton Gooch argued that "Ansell's public philosophy of pragmatic collaborative governance represents a meaningful contribution to our understanding of institutions, the policy environment, and bureaucratic organization," while also noting that "the lion's share of his examples are drawn from policing, where the problems are well-bounded, the stakeholders are clearly defined, and the organizational structures are, at least to some extent, distinctive." Writing for the Socio-Economic Review, Gerald Berk remarked that although there are moments when the book "backtracks, rather than gains ground, in pragmatist progress," he is nevertheless "fully convinced" by the author's approach and most of his decisions. Arvind Sivaramakrishnan called the work "valuable" while critiquing its lack of clarity in "some passages."
Ansell also co-edited What's the Beef?, which analyzed food safety regulations in Europe at national, European, and international levels. According to Cori Ham, it provides a "great" and "detailed" overview of food safety challenges in the EU. Elsa Tsioumani remarked that ranging "from societal attitudes to institutional behaviour and from the national to the global level, the book provides a great overview of the plethora of issues associated with food safety regulation in Europe". In contrast, Alexia Herwig pointed out that his advocacy for stronger and less fragmented European institutions is "somewhat inconsistent" with the claim that "Europeanization interferes with diversity and therefore lacks legitimacy". In Political Studies Review, Katy Wilkinson described the work as a combination of "accessibility with detailed and diverse studies"; however, she observed that it "neither speaks convincingly to the governance literature nor offers fresh perspectives on BSE."
In Public Governance as Co-Creation: A Strategy for Revitalizing the Public Sector and Rejuvenating Democracy, Ansell and co-author Jacob Torfing developed the idea of co-creation as a way to produce public value and stimulate innovation. In another book titled Co-Creation for Sustainability: The UN SDGs and the Power of Local Partnerships, he explained local joint-creation efforts, the building of collaborative platforms, and empowering stakeholders to generate positive collective change. Christopher Walker criticized the book on its overuse of academic terms as compared to business, while also noting the "hidden gem" chapter which reflected the political challenges "associated with the transition to a sustainable future."
With Jarle Trondal and Morten Øgård, Ansell co-edited Governance in Turbulent Times, which developed the concept of turbulence as a perspective from which to understand contemporary governance. In another book titled Robust Governance in Turbulent Times, he proposed the idea of robustness as a strategy of managing turbulence. He also co-edited Handbook on Theories of Governance with Jacob Torfing.
Awards and honors
2013 – Honorary Doctorate, Roskilde University
2018 – Fellow, National Academy of Public Administration
2025 – Top 2% Scientists, Stanford University
Bibliography
Selected books
Ansell, Christopher K. (2001). Schism and Solidarity in Social Movements: The Politics of Labor in the French Third Republic. Cambridge University Press. ISBN9780521033961.
Ansell, Christopher K. (2011). Pragmatist Democracy: Evolutionary Learning as Public Philosophy. Oxford University Press. ISBN9780199772438.
Ansell, Christopher, ed. (2016). What's the Beef?. The MIT Press. ISBN9780262292344.
Ansell, Christopher K.; Trondal, Jarle; Øgård, Morten, eds. (2017). Governance in turbulent times (1ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN9780198739517.
Ansell, Christopher K.; Torfing, Jacob (2021). Public governance as co-creation: a strategy for revitalizing the public sector and rejuvenating democracy. Cambridge University Press. ISBN9781108765381.
Ansell, Christopher K.; Sørensen, Eva; Torfing, Jacob (2022). Co-Creation for Sustainability: The UN SDGs and the Power of Local Partnerships (1sted.). Emerald Publishing Limited. ISBN9781800437982.
Ansell, Christopher; Torfing, Jacob, eds. (2022). Handbook on Theories of Governance (Seconded.). Edward Elgar Publishing. ISBN9781800371972.
Ansell, Christopher K. (2024). Robust governance in turbulent times. Cambridge University Press. ISBN9781009433006.
Selected articles
Padgett, John F.; Ansell, Christopher K. (1993). "Robust Action and the Rise of the Medici, 1400-1434". American Journal of Sociology. 98 (6): 1259–1319. doi:10.1086/230190.
Ansell, Chris; Gash, Alison (2008). "Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice". Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 18 (4): 543–571. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum032.
Ansell, Chris; Boin, Arjen; Keller, Ann (2010). "Managing Transboundary Crises: Identifying the Building Blocks of an Effective Response System". Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management. 18 (4): 195–207. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5973.2010.00620.x.
Ansell, Christopher; Sørensen, Eva; Torfing, Jacob (2021). "The COVID-19 pandemic as a game changer for public administration and leadership? The need for robust governance responses to turbulent problems". Public Management Review. 23 (7): 949–960. doi:10.1080/14719037.2020.1820272.
↑Emerson, K.; Nabatchi, T.; Balogh, S. (1 January 2012). "An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance". Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 22 (1): 2. doi:10.1093/jopart/mur011.
↑Johnston, E. W.; Hicks, D.; Nan, N.; Auer, J. C. (1 October 2011). "Managing the Inclusion Process in Collaborative Governance". Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 21 (4): 699, 701. doi:10.1093/jopart/muq045.
↑van den Berg, Annelieke C.; Giest, Sarah N.; Groeneveld, Sandra M.; Kraaij, Wessel (November 2020). "Inclusivity in Online Platforms: Recruitment Strategies for Improving Participation of Diverse Sociodemographic Groups". Public Administration Review. 80 (6): 989. doi:10.1111/puar.13215. hdl:1887/135608.
↑Wegrich, Kai (2 January 2019). "The blind spots of collaborative innovation". Public Management Review. 21 (1): 1. doi:10.1080/14719037.2018.1433311.
↑Sørensen, Eva; Torfing, Jacob (February 2023). "Enhancing city vitality by building platforms for interactive political leadership: Experiences and results from a longitudinal design experiment". Cities. 133: 1. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2022.104149.
↑Hamilton, William L. (2022). Graph representation learning (Firsted.). Springer International Publishing. ISBN978-3-031-00460-5.
↑Jessop, Bob (2004). "4". In Bache, Ian; Flinders, Matthew (eds.). Multi-level governance and multi-level meta-governance. Oxford University Press. p.62,63. doi:10.1093/0199259259.003.0004.
↑Riain, SeáN ó (June 2000). "The Flexible Developmental State: Globalization, Information Technology, and the "Celtic Tiger"". Politics & Society. 28 (2): 185. doi:10.1177/0032329200028002002.
↑Johnson, Christopher H. (December 2005). "Schism and Solidarity in Social Movements: The Politics of Labor in the French Third Republic. By Christopher K. Ansell. Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences, volume 20. Edited by Mark Granovetter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. Pp. xiii+278. $65.00". The Journal of Modern History. 77 (4): 1114. doi:10.1086/499869.
↑Wofford Gooch, Peyton Elaine (3 July 2015). "Review of Christopher K. Ansell's Pragmatist Democracy: Evolutionary Learning as Public Philosophy: Christopher K. Ansell. Pragmatist Democracy: Evolutionary Learning as Public Philosophy . New York: Oxford University Press, 2011". Administrative Theory & Praxis. 37 (3): 221. doi:10.1080/10841806.2015.1053366.
↑Berk, Gerald (1 July 2012). "On Christopher K. Ansell Pragmatist Democracy: Evolutionary Learning as Public Philosophy. Oxford/New York, NY, Oxford University Press, 2011". Socio-Economic Review. 10 (3): 585. doi:10.1093/ser/mwr040. hdl:11858/00-001M-0000-000F-C407-D.
↑Sivaramakrishnan, Arvind (January 2013). "Book Review: Political Theory: Pragmatist Democracy: Evolutionary Learning as Public Philosophy". Political Studies Review. 11 (1): 75. doi:10.1111/1478-9302.12000.
↑Ham, Cori (May 2009). "What's the beef? The contested Governance of European Food Safety". Global Public Health. 4 (3): 317. doi:10.1080/17441690701638198.
↑Tsioumani, Elsa (August 2008). "What's the Beef? The Contested Governance of European Food Safety ‐ Edited by Christopher Ansell and David Vogel". Review of European Community & International Environmental Law. 17 (2): 248. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9388.2008.598_1.x.
↑Herwig, Alexia (10 December 2007). "Multilevel Food Safety Governance and Its Discontents: Multilevel Food Safety Governance and Its Discontents". International Studies Review. 9 (4): 747. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2486.2007.00741.x.