Intermodal freight transport

Containers being transferred to a cargo ship at the container terminal in Bremerhaven, Bremen, Germany
Intermodal ship-to-rail transfer of containerized cargos at terminals in Portsmouth, Virginia, United States

Intermodal freight transport is a transport system involving the transportation of goods when at least two means of transport are used. This means that two or more different transport modes are involved without changing load units during the time of transportation. The main idea behind intermodal transport is to utilize the strengths of different transport modes in one integrated transport chain, thereby improving the economic performance. It has been argued that economic performance is improved because the most suitable transport mode is used on each part of a trip. The main advantage of intermodal transport solutions is their comparatively low external costs.

According to Forkenbrock (2001), the external cost of an intermodal train per tonne-km is only 28 % of the external cost of a general freight truck. However, the difference in external cost might be even greater than this as the cost of congestion was not included in the calculations. Because intermodal freight transport is less energy intensive than freight transport by road, it is considered to be an important contribution to achieve a sustainable European transport sector (European Commission, 2009). Intermodal freight transport has therefore been promoted by policymakers on all levels. However, the market share of intermodal freight transport has not developed as positively as expected.

IFT reduces cargo handling, and so improves security, reduces damage and loss, and allows freight to be transported faster. Reduced costs over road trucking is the key benefit for inter-continental use. This may be offset by reduced timings for road transport over shorter distances.

Origins

A stagecoach transferred to a railroad car with a gantry crane, an example of early intermodal freight transport by the French Mail in 1844; the drawing is exhibited in Deutsches Museum Verkehrszentrum in Munich.

Intermodal transportation has its origin in 18th century England and predates the railways. Some of the earliest containers were those used for shipping coal on the Bridgewater Canal in England in the 1780s. Coal containers (called "loose boxes" or "tubs") were soon deployed on the early canals and railways and were used for road/rail transfers (road at the time meaning horse-drawn vehicles).

Wooden coal containers were first used on the railways in the 1830s on the Liverpool and Manchester Railway. In 1841, Isambard Kingdom Brunel introduced iron containers to move coal from the vale of Neath to Swansea Docks. By the outbreak of the First World War the Great Eastern Railway was using wooden containers to trans-ship passenger luggage between trains and sailings via the port of Harwich.

The early 1900s saw the first adoption of covered containers, primarily for the movement of furniture and intermodal freight between road and rail. A lack of standards limited the value of this service and this in turn drove standardisation. In the U.S. such containers, known as "lift vans", were in use from as early as 1911.

Intermodal container

Early containers

Transferring freight containers on the London, Midland and Scottish Railway in 1928

In the United Kingdom, containers were first standardised by the Railway Clearing House (RCH) in the 1920s, allowing both railway-owned and privately owned vehicles to be carried on standard container flats. By modern standards these containers were small, being 1.5 or 3.0 meters (4.9 or 9.8 ft) long, normally wooden and with a curved roof and insufficient strength for stacking. From 1928 the London, Midland & Scottish Railway offered "door to door" intermodal road-rail services using these containers. This standard failed to become popular outside the United Kingdom.

Pallets made their first major appearance during World War II, when the United States military assembled freight on pallets, allowing fast transfer between warehouses, trucks, trains, ships, and aircraft. Because no freight handling was required, fewer personnel were needed and loading times were decreased.

Truck trailers were first carried by railway before World War II, an arrangement often called "piggyback", by the small Class I railroad, the Chicago Great Western in 1936. The Canadian Pacific Railway was a pioneer in piggyback transport, becoming the first major North American railway to introduce the service in 1952. In the United Kingdom, the big four railway companies offered services using standard RCH containers that could be craned on and off the back of trucks. Moving companies such as Pickfords offered private services in the same way.

Containerization

In 1933 in Europe, under the auspices of the International Chamber of Commerce, The Bureau International des Containers et du Transport Intermodal (BIC; English: International Bureau for Containers and Intermodal Transport) was established. In June 1933, the BIC decided about obligatory parameters for container use in international traffic. Containers handled by means of lifting gear, such as cranes, overhead conveyors, etc. for traveling elevators (group I containers), constructed after July 1, 1933. Obligatory Regulations:

Obligatory norms for European containers since 1 July 1933[citation needed]
CategoryLength [m (ft in)[m (ft in)][m (ft in)]Total mass [tons]
Heavy types
Close type 623.25 m (10 ft 8 in)2.15 m (7 ft 5⁄8 in)2.20 m (7 ft 2+5⁄8 in) 5 t (4.92 long tons; 5.51 short tons)
Close type 422.15 m (7 ft 5⁄8 in)2.15 m (7 ft 5⁄8 in)2.20 m (7 ft 2+5⁄8 in)
Open type 613.25 m (10 ft 8 in)2.15 m (7 ft 5⁄8 in)1.10 m (3 ft 7+1⁄4 in)
Open type 412.15 m (7 ft 5⁄8 in)2.15 m (7 ft 5⁄8 in)1.10 m (3 ft 7+1⁄4 in)
Light Type
Close type 222.15 m (7 ft 5⁄8 in)1.05 m (3 ft 5+3⁄8 in)2.20 m (7 ft 2+5⁄8 in) 2.5 t (2.46 long tons; 2.76 short tons)
Close type 2012.15 m (7 ft 5⁄8 in)1.05 m (3 ft 5+3⁄8 in)1.10 m (3 ft 7+1⁄4 in)
Open type 212.15 m (7 ft 5⁄8 in)1.05 m (3 ft 5+3⁄8 in)1.10 m (3 ft 7+1⁄4 in)

In April 1935, BIC established a second standard for European containers:

Obligatory norms for European containers since 1 April 1935
CategoryLength [m (ftin)]Width [m (ftin)]High [m (ftin)]Total mass [tons]
Heavy types
Close 623.25 m (10 ft 8 in)2.15 m (7 ft 5⁄8 in)2.55 m (8 ft 4+3⁄8 in) 5 t (4.92 long tons; 5.51 short tons)
Close 422.15 m (7 ft 5⁄8 in)2.15 m (7 ft 5⁄8 in)2.55 m (8 ft 4+3⁄8 in)
Open 613.25 m (10 ft 8 in)2.15 m (7 ft 5⁄8 in)1.125 m (3 ft 8+5⁄16 in)
Open 412.15 m (7 ft 5⁄8 in)2.15 m (7 ft 5⁄8 in)1.125 m (3 ft 8+5⁄16 in)
Light Type
Close 321.50 m (4 ft 11 in)2.15 m (7 ft 5⁄8 in)2.55 m (8 ft 4+3⁄8 in) 2.5 t (2.46 long tons; 2.76 short tons)
Close 221.05 m (3 ft 5+3⁄8 in)2.15 m (7 ft 5⁄8 in)2.55 m (8 ft 4+3⁄8 in)
Highway semi-trailers in piggyback service in Albuquerque, New Mexico

In the 1950s, a new standardized steel Intermodal container based on specifications from the United States Department of Defense began to revolutionize freight transportation. The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) then issued standards based upon the U.S. Department of Defense standards between 1968 and 1970.

The White Pass & Yukon Route railway acquired the world's first container ship, the Clifford J. Rogers, built in 1955, and introduced containers to its railway in 1956. In the United Kingdom the modernisation plan, and in turn the Beeching Report, strongly pushed containerization. British Railways launched the Freightliner service carrying 8-foot (2.4 m) high pre-ISO containers. The older wooden containers and the pre-ISO containers were rapidly replaced by 10-and-20-foot (3.0 and 6.1 m) ISO standard containers, and later by 40-foot (12 m) containers and larger.

In the U.S., starting in the 1960s, the use of containers increased steadily. Rail intermodal traffic tripled between 1980 and 2002, according to the Association of American Railroads (AAR), from 3.1 million trailers and containers to 9.3 million. Large investments were made in intermodal freight projects. An example was the US$740 million Port of Oakland intermodal rail facility begun in the late 1980s.

Since 1984, a mechanism for intermodal shipping known as double-stack rail transport has become increasingly common. Rising to the rate of nearly 70% of the United States' intermodal shipments, it transports more than one million containers per year. The double-stack rail cars design significantly reduces damage in transit and provides greater cargo security by cradling the lower containers so their doors cannot be opened. A succession of large, new, domestic container sizes was introduced to increase shipping productivity. In Europe, the more restricted loading gauge has limited the adoption of double-stack cars. However, in 2007 the Betuweroute, a railway from Rotterdam to the German industrial heartland, was completed, which may accommodate double-stacked containers in the future. Other countries, like New Zealand, have numerous low tunnels and bridges that limit expansion for economic reasons.

Since electrification generally predated double-stacking, the overhead wiring was too low to accommodate it. However, India is building some freight-only corridors with the overhead wiring at 7.45 m above rail, which is high enough.

Containers and container handling

Rubber tired gantry crane double-stacking a 40 foot container
Small intermodal terminal in Chippewa Falls on the Canadian National line

Containers, also known as intermodal containers or ISO containers because the dimensions have been defined by ISO, are the main type of equipment used in intermodal transport, particularly when one of the modes of transportation is by ship. Containers are 8-foot (2.4 m) wide by 8-foot (2.4 m) or 9-foot-6-inch (2.90 m) high. Since introduction, there have been moves to adopt other heights, such as 10-foot-6-inch (3.20 m). The most common lengths are 20 feet (6.1 m), 40 feet (12 m), 45 feet (14 m), 48 and 53 feet (15 and 16 m), although other lengths exist. The three common sizes are:

In countries where the railway loading gauge is sufficient, truck trailers are often carried by rail. Variations exist, including open-topped versions covered by a fabric curtain are used to transport larger loads. A container called a tanktainer, with a tank inside a standard container frame, carries liquids. Refrigerated containers (reefer) are used for perishables. Swap body units have the same bottom corners as intermodal containers but are not strong enough to be stacked. They have folding legs under their frame and can be moved between trucks without using a crane.

Handling equipment can be designed with intermodality in mind, assisting with transferring containers between rail, road and sea. These can include:

Load securing in intermodal containers

According to the European Commission Transportation Department "it has been estimated that up to 25% of accidents involving trucks can be attributable to inadequate cargo securing". Cargo that is improperly secured can cause severe accidents and lead to the loss of cargo, the loss of lives, the loss of vehicles, ships and airplane; not to mention the environmental hazards it can cause. There are many different ways and materials available to stabilize and secure cargo in containers used in the various modes of transportation. Conventional Load Securing methods and materials such as steel banding and wood blocking & bracing have been around for decades and are still widely used. In the last few years the use of several, relatively new and unknown Load Securing methods have become available through innovation and technological advancement including polyester strapping and -lashing, synthetic webbings and Dunnage Bags, also known as air bags.

Transportation modes

Container ships

The 300-meter (984-foot) long container ship Balzac in Zeebrugge port in Belgium

Container ships are used to transport containers by sea. These vessels are custom-built to hold containers. Some vessels can hold thousands of containers. Their capacity is often measured in TEU or FEU. These initials stand for "twenty-foot equivalent unit", and "forty-foot equivalent unit", respectively. For example, a vessel that can hold 1,000 40-foot containers or 2,000 20-foot containers can be said to have a capacity of 2,000 TEU. After the year 2006, the largest container ships in regular operation are capable of carrying in excess of 15,000 TEU.

On board ships they are typically stacked up to seven units high.

A key consideration in the size of container ships is that larger ships exceed the capacity of important sea routes such as the Panama and Suez canals. The largest size of container ship able to traverse the Panama canal is referred to as Panamax, which is presently around 5,000 TEU. A third set of locks is planned as part of the Panama Canal expansion project to accommodate container ships up to 12,000 TEU in future, comparable to the present Suezmax.

Very large container ships also require specialized deep water terminals and handling facilities. The container fleet available, route constraints, and terminal capacity play a large role in shaping global container shipment logistics.

Railways and intermodal terminals

Georgia Ports Authority intermodal terminal at the Port of Savannah
Spine cars with semi trailers on them
Class 1 railroads with intermodal terminals and maritime RoRo ports

Increasingly, containers are shipped by rail in container well cars. These cars resemble flatcars but have a container-sized depression, or well, in the middle of the car between the bogies or trucks. Some container cars are built as an articulated "unit" of three or five permanently coupled cars, each having a single bogie rather than the two bogies normally found on freight cars.

Containers can be loaded on flatcars or in container well cars. In North America, Australia and Saudi Arabia, where vertical clearances are generally liberal, this depression is sufficient for two containers to be loaded in a "double-stack" arrangement. In Europe, height restrictions imposed by smaller structure gauges, and frequent overhead electrification, prevent double-stacking. Containers are therefore hauled one-high, either on standard flatcars or other railroad cars – but they must be carried in well wagons on lines built early in the Industrial Revolution, such as in the United Kingdom, where loading gauges are relatively small. In India (which uses Indian broad gauge) and China double-stack container trains run on electrified rail lines purpose-built or upgraded to the needed standards. There are plans to electrify the Mombasa–Nairobi Standard Gauge Railway which has been transporting double-stacked containers with diesel locomotives since 2018.

610 mm (2 ft) narrow-gauge railways have smaller wagons that do not readily carry ISO containers, nor do the 30-foot (9.14 m) long and 7-foot (2.13 m) wide wagons of the 762 mm (2 ft 6 in) gauge Kalka-Shimla Railway. Wider narrow gauge railways of e.g. 914 mm (3 ft) and 1,000 mm (3 ft 3+3⁄8 in) gauge can take ISO containers, provided that the loading gauge allows it.

It is also common in North America and Australia to transport semi-trailers on railway flatcars or spine cars, an arrangement called "piggyback" or TOFC (trailer on flatcar) to distinguish it from container on flatcar (COFC). Some flatcars are designed with collapsible trailer hitches so they can be used for trailer or container service. Such designs allow trailers to be rolled on from one end, though lifting trailers on and off flatcars by specialized loaders is more common. TOFC terminals typically have large areas for storing trailers pending loading or pickup.

Thievery has become a problem in North America. Sophisticated thieves learn how to interpret the codes on the outside of containers to ascertain which ones have easily disposable cargo. They break into isolated containers on long trains, or even board slowly moving trains to toss the items to accomplices on the ground.

Trucks

A truck transporting a container on Interstate 95 in South Florida

Trucking is frequently used to connect the "linehaul" ocean and rail segments of a global intermodal freight movement. This specialized trucking that runs between ocean ports, rail terminals, and inland shipping docks, is often called drayage, and is typically provided by dedicated drayage companies or by the railroads. As an example, since many rail lines in the United States terminate in or around Chicago, Illinois, the area serves as a common relay point for containerized freight moving across the country. Many of the motor carriers call this type of drayage "crosstown loads" that originate at one rail road and terminate at another. For example, a container destined for the east coast from the west will arrive in Chicago either via the Union Pacific or BNSF Railway and have to be relayed to one of the eastern railroads, either CSX or Norfolk Southern.

Barges

Barge transportation provides a sustainable and cost-effective alternative to road transport, offering solutions to reduce congestion and lower emissions. However, increasing drought frequency and severity, driven by climate change, along with human interventions such as dam operations, dredging, and water withdrawals, cause fluctuations in water levels in rivers and canals that jeopardize its reliability and efficiency. These variations, including shallow water conditions, reduced water levels, and restricted navigable depths, directly impact barge operations by limiting transportation capacity. A barge's load capacity depends not only on its physical characteristics but also on the available water level along its route. Insufficient or diminished water levels impose draught restrictions that constrain freight volume and weight, creating operational challenges that hinder carriers’ ability to meet shipper demands efficiently and maintain profitability. Barges utilising ro-ro and container-stacking techniques transport freight on large inland waterways such as the Rhine/Danube in Europe and the Mississippi River in the U.S.

Over the last decade, intermodal barge transport has been successful in gaining market share in Northwest Europe. The barge sector has been able to cater to the ever-increasing demands of shippers. It is now a leading mode of transport along the major river corridors and contributed to opening new geographical markets. These developments are due to the cost-quality features of intermodal barge transport compared to its main competitor, unimodal road transport.

Land bridges

The term landbridge or land bridge is commonly used in the intermodal freight transport sector. When a containerized ocean freight shipment travels across a large body of land for a significant distance, that portion of the trip is referred to as the "land bridge" and the mode of transport used is rail transport. There are three applications for the term.

The term reverse land bridge refers to a micro land bridge from an east coast port (as opposed to a west coast port in the previous examples) to an inland destination.

Planes and aircraft

A U.S. Army CH-47 Chinook helicopter carries a sling-loaded 20 foot shipping container during retrograde operations and base closures in the Wardak province of Afghanistan
Tri-con being loaded onto a C-130 in Afghanistan

Air freight transport connects distant markets and global supply chains in a fast and reliable way. High value and perishable goods are transported all over the world, hence, improving air connectivity represents a key element to sustainable economic growth. In intermodal supply chains, air freight transport is one of the vital parts, and better inclusion is justified and encouraged. For example, in 2025, Cainiao, Alibaba's logistics arm, reached a long-term strategic partnership with Qatar Airways Cargo, which was expected to more than double weekly freight flights on core China-Europe routes. The partnership aimed to increase capacity, improve schedule reliability and provide more flexible shipping options for e-commerce platforms such as AliExpress. Air freight transport is analyzed by amount and value transported in the European Union and the world, as well as its share in global freight transport. Intermodal technologies in all transport modes are described and analyzed, with a special overview of air freight intermodal technologies.

Air freight transport contributes significantly to the world economy and is a key indicator of its efficiency, as goods transported by air, despite a modest 0.5% volume share of transported goods in the world, reaches 35% of total freight traffic  in  value  carried  by  air  transport,  representing  about  $6.5  trillion annually  and  provides  87.7 million  jobs worldwide according to ABBB (2021).

Biggest shipping liner companies by TEU capacity

Top 20 container shipping companies in order of TEU capacity, 6 January 2016
CompanyTEU capacityNumber of ships
A.P. Moller-Maersk Group2,996,188585
Mediterranean Shipping Company2,678,779496
CMA CGM1,819,351460
Evergreen Marine Corporation931,849195
Hapag-Lloyd930,398174
COSCO870,222162
CSCL684,640134
Hamburg Süd645,889136
Hanjin Shipping626,217104
OOCL561,522104
MOL554,42598
Yang Ming Marine Transport Corporation538,912102
APL535,00786
UASC512,78557
NYK Line495,723104
K Line386,26566
Hyundai Merchant Marine379,39257
Pacific International Lines362,131147
Zim358,26482
Wan Hai Lines215,24485

See also

References

  1. ↑ Krykhtina, Y.O. (2002). State Policy of the Transport Industry Development in Ukraine: Theory, Methodology, Practice. Kharkiv, Ukraine: Disa plus.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: date and year (link)
  2. ↑ Ostapenko, T.G.; Pryschepa, N.P.; Grashchenko, I.S. (2018). Transport System of Ukraine as an Element of the Global Transport System. Mukacheve, Ukraine: Mukachevo State University. pp. 177–185.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: date and year (link)
  3. ↑ Dolya, K.V. (2018). Network Modeling and Analysis of Transport Processes: Monograph. Kharkiv, Ukraine: Kharkiv National University of Urban Economy named after A. N. Beketov.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: date and year (link)
  4. ↑ Flodén, Jonas (2007). Modelling Intermodal Freight Transport: The Potential of Combined Transport in Sweden. Göteborg, Sweden: BAS Publishing. ISBN 978-91-7246-252-6.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: date and year (link)
  5. ↑ Rodrigue, Jean-Paul; Comtois, Claude; Slack, Brian (2009). The Geography of Transport Systems. London: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-48324-7.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: date and year (link)
  6. ↑ OECD (2001-02-22). "Intermodal Freight Transport: Institutional Aspects". Road Transport and Intermodal Linkages Research Programme. OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264189126-en.
  7. 1 2 Hanssen, Thor-Erik Sandberg; Mathisen, Terje Andreas (2011). "The Social Costs of Intermodal Freight Transport" (PDF). European Transport (49): 75–89.
  8. ↑ Forkenbrock, David J. (2001-05-01). "Comparison of external costs of rail and truck freight transportation". Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 35 (4): 321–337. doi:10.1016/S0965-8564(99)00061-0. ISSN 0965-8564.
  9. ↑ Woodburn, Allan; Browne, Michael; Piotrowska, Marzena; Allen, Julian (2007). "Literature Review WM7: Scope for Modal Shift through Fiscal, Regulatory and Organisational Change" (PDF). University of Westminster and University of Leeds: 53.
  10. ↑ Macharis, Cathy; Caris, AN; Jourquin, Bart; Pekin, Ethem (2011). "A Decision Support Framework for Intermodal Transport Policy". European Transport Research Review. 3 (4): 167–178.
  11. ↑ Janic, Milan (2007). "Modelling the Full Costs of an Intermodal and Road Freight Transport Network". Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 12 (1): 33–44.
  12. ↑ Hanssen, Thor-Erik; Mathisen, Terje (2014-12-31). "The Academic Literature on Intermodal Freight Transport". Transportation Research Procedia. 3: 611–620. doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2014.10.040.
  13. ↑ Lewandowski, Krzysztof (31 December 2014). "Czechoslovak activity to prepare European norms for containers before the Second World War". Acta Logistica. 1 (4): 1–7. doi:10.22306/al.v1i4.25.
  14. ↑ Initial Study: Intermodal Interface Demonstration Project, Port of Oakland, Oakland, California, Earth Metrics and Korve Engineerning, December 20, 1989
  15. ↑ "Port of Oakland Official Site: Facts and Figures (2006)". Archived from the original on August 8, 2013.
  16. ↑ Railway Gazette International August 2009, p. 17
  17. 1 2 3 4 Rushton, A., Oxley, J., Croucher, P. (2004) The Handbook of Logistics and Distribution Kogan: London
  18. ↑ Jones, Sean. "Container Loading and Unloading System". Patent Docs. Retrieved 30 December 2014.
  19. ↑ "European Commission Transport". Road Safety: Best practice guidelines on cargo securing and abnormal transport. April 9, 2009. Archived from the original on October 9, 2009. Retrieved November 16, 2009.
  20. ↑ AXSliner.com Archived 2009-03-27 at the Wayback Machine
  21. ↑ Julie Holt (28 May 2010). "Ebba Mærsk beats world record". Ingeniøren. Archived from the original on 31 May 2010. Retrieved 11 June 2010.
  22. ↑ Berglund, Patrik. "How the Panama Canal Expansion Affects Freight Rates". www.xeneta.com.
  23. ↑ The Scottish Government – Container Transhipment and Demand for Container Terminal Capacity in Scotland
  24. ↑ "Halifax Port Authority Presentation" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-07-10. Retrieved 2007-05-12.
  25. ↑ "Indian Railways sets new benchmark! Runs 1st Double-stack container train in high rise OHE electrified sections". 12 June 2020.
  26. ↑ Zhao, Zhongbin; Chen, Jihong; Shen, Mengru; Wan, Zheng; Wang, Hao; Yu, Linlan (May 2025). "Loading optimization of mixed-type containers for double-stack trains in multi-hub logistics". Advanced Engineering Informatics. 65 103128. doi:10.1016/j.aei.2025.103128.
  27. ↑ "Chinese firm lends Kenya Sh25bn to electrify SGR". 27 December 2020.
  28. ↑ "SGR launch double-stack freight trains to boost efficiency at Mombasa Port".
  29. ↑ "Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe TOFC / COFC Cars Album – Page One". www.qstation.org.
  30. ↑ "42°21'35.4"N 71°05'31.6"W". 42°21'35.4"N 71°05'31.6"W.
  31. ↑ Wollan, Malia (January 28, 2024). "The Great Freight-Train Heists". New York Times. Retrieved February 7, 2024.
  32. ↑ Forbes Logistics 2006
  33. ↑ Payami, Bita; Bilegan, Ioana C.; Crainic, Teodor Gabriel; Rei, Walter (2026-01-01). "Tactical Network Planning for Intermodal Barge Transportation Considering Varying Water Levels". Transportation Research Procedia. 95: 153–160. doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2026.02.020. ISSN 2352-1465.
  34. ↑ Konings, Rob (2003-01-01). "Network Design for Intermodal Barge Transport". Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 1820: 17–25. doi:10.3141/1820-03.
  35. ↑ Miller, Rory K. (1977). "Land Bridge, Mini-Bridge, and Micro-Bridge: A Question of Getting It Together". Transportation Journal. 17 (1): 64–66. JSTOR 20712449.
  36. ↑ Geography of Transportation; Edward James Taaffe, Howard L. Gauthier, and Morton E. O'Kelly, 1996.[ISBN missing][page needed]
  37. 1 2 Bartulović, Dajana; Abramović, Borna; Brnjac, Nikolina; Steiner, Sanja (2022-01-01). "Role of air freight transport in intermodal supply chains". Transportation Research Procedia. International Scientific Conference “The Science and Development of Transport - Znanost i razvitak prometa”. 64: 119–127. doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2022.09.015. ISSN 2352-1465.
  38. ↑ "China's Cainiao to expand global 5-day delivery service to six more nations". chinadailyhk. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  39. ↑ Air Transport Action Group (2020). Aviation: Benefits Beyond Borders. Air Transport Action Group.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: date and year (link)
  40. ↑ Bartulović, Dajana; Abramović, Borna; Brnjac, Nikolina; Steiner, Sanja (2022-10-13). "Role of air freight transport in intermodal supply chains". Transportation Research Procedia. 64: 119–127. doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2022.09.015.
  41. ↑ "PublicTop100". alphaliner.axsmarine.com.
  42. ↑ "Leading container shipping companies – number of ships 2020". Statista.

Bibliography