भारतीय खाद्य सुरक्षा एवं मानक प्राधिकरण | |
![]() | |
| Regulatory authority overview | |
|---|---|
| Formed | 5 September 2008 |
| Jurisdiction | India |
| Headquarters | |
Regulatory authority executives |
|
Parent Regulatory authority | Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India |
| Website | www |
| Food safety |
|---|
| Terms |
| Critical factors |
| Bacterial pathogens |
| Viral pathogens |
| Parasitic pathogens |
The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) is a statutory body under the administration of the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. It regulates the manufacture, storage, distribution, sale, and import of food articles, while also establishing standards to ensure food safety. The FSSAI was established by the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006, which consolidated all former acts and orders related to food safety that were previously handled by various ministries and departments.
The FSSAI has its headquarters at New Delhi. The authority also has four regional offices located in Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata, and Chennai. There are 22 referral laboratories notified by FSSAI, 72 State/UT laboratories located throughout India and 112 laboratories are NABL accredited private laboratories notified by FSSAI. The FSSAI is headed by a non-executive chairperson, appointed by the central government, either holding or has held the position of not below the rank of Secretary to the Government of India. Ms. Punya Salila Srivastava is the current chairperson for FSSAI and Rajit Punhani is the current chief executive officer for FSSAI. The FSSAI provisions are enforced by Food Safety Officers.
In 2021, with the aim of benefitting industries involved in manufacturing, handling, packaging and selling of food items, FSSAI decided to grant perpetual licenses to restaurants and food manufacturers on the condition that they file their returns every year. Food Safety and Standards Authority of India License or Registration is required for any food business in India that manufactures, stores, transports, or distributes food. Depending on the size and nature of the company, FSSAI registration or license may be required.
FSSAI was established on 5 September 2008 under Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 which was operationalized in year 2006. The FSSAI consists of a chairperson and 22 members. The FSSAI is responsible for setting standards for food so that there is one body to deal with and no confusion in the minds of consumers, traders, manufacturers, and investors. Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India is the Administrative Ministry of Food Safety and Standards Authority of India. The following are the statutory powers that the FSS Act, 2006 gives to the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI).
FSSAI is located in 4 regions
The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India is a statutory body under Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. The Food Safety and Standards Act (FSS), 2006 is the primary law for the regulation of food products. This act also sets up the formulation and enforcement of food safety standards in India. The FSSAI appoints food safety authorities on the state level.
The FSSAI functions under the administrative control of the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. The main aim of FSSAI is to
The FSS Act is a bucket for all the older laws, rules and regulations for food safety. The FSS Act took 7 older acts into one umbrella.
Departments
FSSAI has set certain guidelines for food safety research. The Research and Development division is responsible for research with the following objectives:
FSSAI has been mandated to perform various functions related to the quality and standards of food and drinks . These functions in addition to others include "Laying down procedure and guidelines for notification of the accredited laboratories as per ISO17025." The FSSAI notified laboratories that are classified as:
Standards framed by FSSAI are prescribed under Food Safety and Standards (Food Product Standards and Food Additives) Regulation, 2011, Food Safety and Standards (Packaging and Labelling) Regulation, 2011 and Food Safety and Standards (Contaminants, Toxins, and Residues) Regulations, 2011.
The FSSAI has prescribed standards for the following:
The development of standards is a dynamic process based on the latest developments in food science, food consumption pattern, new food products, and additives, changes in the processing technology leading to changed specifications, advancements in food analytical methods, and identification of new risks or other regulatory options.
Formulation of standards of any article of food under the Food Safety and Standards Act 2006, involves several stages. After consideration by the Food Authority, the draft standard is published (Draft notified), for inviting stakeholder comments. Since India is a signatory to the WTO-SPS Committee, Draft Standard is also notified in WTO. Thereafter, taking into account the comments received from the stakeholders, the Standard is finalized and notified in the Gazette of India, and implemented.
In response to a Supreme Court order dated 10 September 2026 in a case concerning front-of-pack nutrition labelling (FoPL), FSSAI filed a compliance affidavit proposing a single-phase rollout of warning labels for packaged foods exceeding prescribed thresholds for fat, sugar and salt. Under the proposal, qualifying products would carry a red hexagon on a white square background positioned at the top left of the front of the pack, while any product containing artificial sweeteners would be required to carry the statement "contain non caloric sweetener" on the front of the pack instead of the back panel.
FSSAI stated it would finalise the labelling regulations within about four months, after which manufacturers would have a voluntary implementation period of 365 days before the stricter labelling became mandatory, a transition intended to allow use of existing stocks of printed packaging material. The matter was listed before the Supreme Court for further hearing on 28 September 2026.
On 22 September 2026, FSSAI notified a draft amendment to the Food Safety and Standards (Prohibition and Restrictions on Sales) Regulations, 2011, that would restrict the use of the word "paneer" for products made from ingredients not derived from milk. The Food Safety and Standards (Prohibition and Restrictions on Sales) Amendment Regulations, 2026 would insert a new clause under Regulation 2.1.1 covering "paneer made of constituents not derived from milk". Products already licensed or registered under the "analogue in dairy context" category would have to stop using the term "paneer" in their names, labelling and marketing.
FSSAI invited objections and suggestions from stakeholders and the public, and the draft is to be considered after 60 days from the date the notification is made available to the public.
Food Safety Officers are responsible for enforcing and executing the provisions of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 within their designated areas. The Commissioner of Food Safety and Designated Officer have the authority to exercise the same powers as Food Safety Officers.
Food Safety Officers possess the right to enter and inspect any place where food articles are manufactured, stored, or exhibited for commercial purposes. They are authorized to collect samples for analysis by a Food Analyst. The authority of a Food Safety Officer to enter and inspect premises is equal to that of a police officer equipped with a search warrant under the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC). They can issue registrations to food business operators.
Consumers can connect to FSSAI through various channels. A GAMA portal for concerns regarding misleading claims and advertisements too is operated.
FSSAI issues three types of license based on the nature of the food business and turnover:
Other criteria like the location of the business, number of retail stores, etc. are needed while evaluating the nature of the license application.
In 2009 the FSSAI instigated a pilot project Safe Food, Tasty Food to improve the safety and quality of food being served at restaurants and other outlets, implementing agencies being local municipal authorities and industry associations (FICCI, CII, AIFPA and NRAI).
The State Food Safety Index (SFSI), was developed in 2018 in collaboration with the FSSAI. The SFSI was created to motivate the States and Union Territories to improve their performance and work towards establishing an appropriate food safety ecosystem.
According to a survey conducted over 24,000 people across 293 districts of India, 73% of the 12,308 responses indicated little to no confidence in the effectiveness of agencies such as FSSAI and state food regulators in ensuring food safety. The need for stricter regulation of eateries was highlighted by Prof Edmond Fernandes, Director, Edward & Cynthia Institute of Public Health, citing kitchen safety, food additives, climate change and hygiene standards and irregular visits by food inspectors.
In August 2015, the Supreme Court of India upheld a Bombay High Court order that quashed a central advisory issued by the FSSAI regarding its product approval procedure. Prior to this ruling, the FSSAI required food companies to seek regulatory approvals for new products through executive advisories rather than parliamentary regulations. The courts ruled that the FSSAI lacked the statutory power to mandate such approvals without framing formal regulations under Section 92 of the Food Safety and Standards Act. Following the Supreme Court's dismissal of the FSSAI's appeal, the regulator was forced to temporarily scrap its product approval process, which industry bodies had criticized as arbitrary and a hindrance to innovation.
In June 2015, the FSSAI ordered a nationwide recall and ban on all nine variants of Nestlé's Maggi instant noodles, alleging that the product contained excessive levels of lead and mislabelled monosodium glutamate (MSG). Nestlé challenged the nationwide ban in the Bombay High Court. In August 2015, the High Court struck down the FSSAI's ban, ruling that the regulatory body had violated the principles of natural justice by failing to provide the company with a proper hearing before issuing the recall. Furthermore, the court noted that the laboratories utilized by the FSSAI to test the noodle samples were not accredited by the National Accreditation Board for Testing and Calibration Laboratories (NABL) for those specific tests.
In December 2017, the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) tabled a comprehensive performance audit on the implementation of the Food Safety and Standards Act (Report No. 37 of 2017). The audit highlighted severe systemic and administrative failures within the FSSAI. The CAG found that the authority lacked a documented policy on risk-based inspections and had no functional database on food businesses operating in the country. The report revealed a critical shortage of qualified manpower; out of 16 state food laboratories test-checked by the CAG, 15 did not have qualified food analysts, and 65 out of 72 state laboratories lacked NABL accreditation. The CAG also criticized the FSSAI for failing to ensure that customs authorities took appropriate action on non-conformance reports to prevent unsafe food imports from entering India.
Public health experts and parliamentary panels have heavily criticized the FSSAI for prolonged delays in finalizing and implementing a Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labelling (FOPL) system for packaged foods. Draft norms were initially issued in September 2022 to introduce visual warning labels (indicating high fat, sugar, and salt content) to combat rising obesity and diet-related non-communicable diseases. However, the regulations faced significant pushback and lobbying from the ultra-processed food industry. In 2026, the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Consumer Affairs formally expressed dismay over the years-long regulatory standstill, urging the FSSAI to fast-track interpretative warning labels to empower consumers, noting that current back-of-pack numerical disclosures fail to alter purchasing behavior.
The FSSAI has faced scrutiny over regulatory lags regarding misleading marketing by beverage brands marketed towards children. Following a 2023 public controversy regarding the high sugar content in Mondelez India's Bournvita, the Ministry of Commerce and Industry intervened in April 2024, directing e-commerce platforms to de-list dairy, cereal, and malt-based beverage mixes from their "Health Drink" or "Energy Drink" categories. The directive highlighted that FSSAI regulations lacked a standardized, legal definition for a "health drink." Consequently, the FSSAI stepped up crackdowns on misleading claims, eventually forcing manufacturers like Mondelez and Amway to withdraw unsubstantiated health and nutrient-comparison claims from their packaging and online advertising.
In early 2024, food safety regulators in Hong Kong and Singapore recalled specific batches of Indian spice brands MDH and Everest, citing the presence of ethylene oxide, a known carcinogen used as a fumigant. Amid this international scrutiny, media reports and activists alleged that the FSSAI had simultaneously and quietly raised the Maximum Residue Limit (MRL) for pesticides in herbs and spices tenfold, from 0.01 mg/kg to 0.1 mg/kg. The FSSAI issued a clarification refuting the characterization, stating that the default limit of 0.1 mg/kg was only applicable to pesticides not officially registered with the Ministry of Agriculture, a move they argued aligned with international Codex Alimentarius standards. Following extensive testing of domestic samples in accredited laboratories, the FSSAI later announced that it found no traces of ethylene oxide in the domestic products of the implicated spice brands.