This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
| Part of a series on |
| Climate change and society |
|---|

Passive house or Passivhaus is a voluntary building performance standard designed to have high energy efficiency and thermal comfort while substantially reduces a building’s carbon footprint. Buildings certified to the standard are ultra-low energy and typically require very little energy for space heating or cooling. The approach is used for housing and for non-residential buildings such as offices, schools, kindergartens and healthcare facilities. Energy efficiency is integral to architectural design rather than an add-on. Although most common in new construction, the principles are also applied in deep renovations.
As of January 2025,[update] projects certified by the Passive House Institute (PHI) comprise over 47,400 units with about 4.32 million m2 (46.5 million sq ft) of treated floor area (TFA) worldwide; the public PHI database lists nearly 6,000 projects. In North America, the Passive House Institute US (PHIUS) reported over 500 certified projects in total and around 1.6 million sq ft (150,000 m2) certified in 2024 alone, with 4.4 million sq ft (410,000 m2) design-certified that year. While early adoption concentrated in German-speaking countries and Scandinavia, certified projects are now documented across diverse climate zones, including hot-humid and tropical regions.
The term passive house was originally used in the 1970s for buildings emphasizing passive solar strategies. Since the 1990s, the term has instead referred to buildings that meeting specific quantified PHI certification criteria (space conditioning, primary energy, airtightness and comfort requirements). The standard originated from a 1988 discussion between Bo Adamson (Lund University) and Wolfgang Feist (then at the Institute for Housing and Environment, Darmstadt), followed by research supported by the state of Hesse. Passive solar strategies are not required, although they often form part of the approach to meet the certification criteria.
North American “superinsulation” pioneers of the 1970s (e.g., the Saskatchewan Conservation House and the Leger House) provided important technical precedents, including heat-recovery ventilation and airtightness testing.
Four terraced houses in Darmstadt-Kranichstein (1990–1991) are widely cited as the first built to what became the Passive House standard.

The Passivhaus-Institut (PHI) was founded in 1996 in Darmstadt to develop, promote and certify buildings under to the standard. By 2010 it was estimated that over 25,000 Passive House buildings existed worldwide.
The standard has since been applied to-large scale developments. Gaobeidian, China, hosts what is reported as the world’s largest Passive House development (Railway City), with several hundred thousand m² of certified area built in phases since 2019. The 88m tower in Bilbao, Spain (2018), is the world's tallest certified Passive House building.
In the UK health sector, the Passivhaus-certified Foleshill Health Centre (Coventry, opened 2021) demonstrated substantial energy savings in operation and a replicable delivery model for NHS facilities.
In the United States, Katrin Klingenberg’s 2003 “Smith House” (Urbana, IL) contributed to the development of the movement that led to the creation of PHIUS (2007). PHIUS has since certified hundreds of projects; New York City’s Park Avenue Green (2019) was recognized as North America’s largest Passive House affordable housing project at the time.
More recent examples within the United States can be seen in projects such as the Gallatin Passive House built in 2020 by North River Architecture and Planning in Gallatin, New York. The Sonoran Desert Passive in Tucson, Arizona which was designed by Brubaker Architects and received its final certification in 2021. Another example of a passive addition (rather than completely new build or renovation) can be found in the Theresa Passive House designed by Studio Ferme, in Austin, Texas; the project completed construction in 2020 and received it's final certification in 2022.

While techniques such as superinsulation predate the standard, Passive House (PHI) specifies quantitative performance criteria and quality assurance. Key requirements include:
Two related but distinct Passive House certification systems are used in North America:
The two programs use different energy models and protocols and certify independently.
Passive House building costs vary by market, building type, and the experience of the construction team. Reported cost premiums for Passive House construction over conventional construction have ranged from ~5–10% in Germany, the UK and the US, with reductions noted as supply chains mature.
The specific drivers of building cost and complexity vary, but relative to basic Code-compliant construction, Passive Houses typically include superinsulation of the envelope, requiring greater thickness and complexity of the wall assembly in particular, and particular attention to air, water, and vapour barriers, including at all penetrations. They also include very high performance window and exterior door systems.
Cost premiums are partially offset by downsized or eliminated conventional heating/cooling systems, and lower operating costs over the building life cycle. Delivery at cost parity with standard code buildings has been demonstrated in some German multifamily projects (e.g., Vauban, Freiburg). High-latitude locations (>60°N) can face higher envelope and glazing costs to meet targets.
Passive House features can also be incorporated into existing buildings through retrofits, although such projects can turn out to be expensive. In the UK an architect incurred a total cost to adapt a small four-bedroom 1960s house of about £80,000, over ten years to spread the cost, without including additional costs for architectural work. The windows cost about £30,000; making the house airtight about £5,000. On a hot day, the temperature inside was about 10°C cooler than outside. In winter a single radiator was enough to heat the whole house, with a reduction of 88% in required energy. However, in a heatwave with hot nights, unusual in the UK, the temperature during the day rose to about the night-time ambient temperature. While retrofitting to full passive house standard is expensive, it has been suggested that "even doing the 50% best is massive in terms of energy bills".

Core practices include:
Concerns are sometimes raised that occupants must restrict behaviours (e.g., opening windows), but sensitivity analyses indicate performance is generally robust to typical occupant variation.