Gallienus usurpers

Ancient Roman bust of Gallienus.
Ancient Roman bust of Gallienus.

The Gallienus usurpers were the usurpers who claimed imperial power during the reign of Gallienus (253–268, the first part of which he shared with his father Valerian). The existence of usurpers during the Crisis of the Third Century was very common, and the high number of usurpers fought by Gallienus is due to his long rule; fifteen years being considered long by the standards of the 3rd century Roman Empire.

Uprisings after the defeat of Valerian

After Valerian's defeat and capture by the Persians in 260, his son Gallienus became the only emperor. However, many uprisings happened, both in the East, with the formation of the Palmyrene Empire, and in the West, with the birth of the Gallic Empire. With the uncertainty of the period, the legions wanted to restore Roman power in the wake of Valerian's defeat, against the pressure of the barbarian people in the west and the Persians in the East.

Usurpers in the West

Usurpers in the East

Historia Augusta historiography

The author(s) of the Historia Augusta listed several other Gallienus usurpers in the book on the "Thirty Tyrants." Given the notorious unreliability of the Historia Augusta, the veracity of this list is debatable. There is a scholarly consensus that the author deliberately inflated the number of pretenders in order to parallel the Thirty Tyrants of Athens. Edward Gibbon identified nineteen. The Historia actually gives 32 names. The author, who wrote under the name of Trebellius Pollio, places the last two during the reigns of Maximinus Thrax and Claudius II respectively, leaving thirty alleged pretenders during the reign of Gallienus.

The following list gives the Thirty Tyrants as depicted by the Historia Augusta, along with notes contrasting the Historia Augusta's claims with their actual historical positions:

Chapter in
Historia Augusta
Name Notes about historicity
2 Cyriades never claimed Imperial dignity
3 Postumus accurate placement
4 Postumus Junior youth; probably never existed
5 Laelianus accurate placement
6 Victorinus contemporary not with Gallienus but Claudius II and Aurelian
7 Victorinus Junior Fiction, never existed
8 Marius accurate placement
9 Ingenuus accurate placement
10 Regalianus accurate placement
11 Aureolus accurate placement
12 Macrianus accurate placement
13 Macrianus Junior accurate placement
14 Quietus accurate placement
15 Odaenathus never claimed Imperial dignity
16 Herodes youth, never claimed Imperial dignity, but older brother of Vaballathus (see below), who did so.
17 Maeonius never claimed Imperial dignity
18 Balista never claimed Imperial dignity
19 Valens probably never claimed Imperial dignity
20 Valens Superior contemporary of Decius, not Valerianus
21 Piso probably never claimed Imperial dignity
22 Aemilianus probably never claimed Imperial dignity
23 Saturninus probably fictitious
24 Tetricus Senior contemporary not with Gallienus but Claudius II and Aurelian
25 Tetricus Junior youth, contemporary not with Gallienus but Claudius II and Aurelian
26 Trebellianus probably fictitious
27 Herennianus youth, never claimed Imperial dignity, possibly fictitious
28 Timolaus youth, never claimed Imperial dignity, possibly fictitious
29 Celsus probably fictitious
30 Zenobia female, accurate placement, her son Vaballathus also claimed imperial dignity
31 Victoria (or Vitruvia) female, never claimed Imperial dignity
32 Titus admittedly not contemporary with Gallienus but Maximinus Thrax
33 Censorinus admittedly not contemporary with Gallienus but Claudius II

Notwithstanding the author's pretensions regarding the time during which these persons aspired to the throne, this list includes:

This leaves nine pretenders roughly contemporary with Gallienus. According to David Magie (the editor of the Loeb Classical Library edition of the Historia Augusta), at least some of these men issued coins.

See also

References

  1. ↑ Gibbon, Edward (1776). "10". The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. London: Folio Society. p. 149.
  2. ↑ J. F. Drinkwater (1987). The Gallic Empire: Separatism and continuity in the north-western provinces of the Roman Empire, A.D. 260–274, Franz Steiner Verlag Wiesbaden GMBH, Stuttgart, ISBN 3-515-04806-5, p. 65.
  3. ↑ Cancik, H.; Schneider, H.; Salazar, C., Brill's New Pauly: Encyclopaedia of the Ancient World. Antiquity, Volume 14 (2009), p. 91