This article documents a current election. Information may change rapidly as the election progresses until official results have been published. Initial news reports may be unreliable, and the last updates to this article may not reflect the most current information. |
November 3, 2026
| |||||||||||||||||
| Reporting | as of 8:39 AM CST | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||||||||
Turek: 40–50% 50–60% 60–70% 70–80% Hinson: 40–50% 50–60% 60–70% 70–80% | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| Elections in Iowa |
|---|
The 2026 United States Senate election in Iowa was held on November 3, 2026, to elect a member of the United States Senate to represent the state of Iowa. Democratic state representative Josh Turek defeated Republican representative Ashley Hinson. Republican incumbent Joni Ernst did not seek a third term.
Primary elections were held on June 2. Endorsed by President Donald Trump, Hinson won the Republican nomination with 73.9% of the vote over former state senator Jim Carlin. Turek won the Democratic nomination with 62.6% of the vote over state senator Zach Wahls.
Turek is the first Democrat to win a Senate election in Iowa since 2008 and the first to win a federal statewide election in Iowa since Barack Obama's win in the 2012 presidential election.
Since voting for President Barack Obama in both 2008 and 2012, Iowa had trended increasingly Republican and was considered a moderately to strongly red state at the federal and state level. Republican nominee Donald Trump won Iowa in 2020 by 8 percentage points, and in 2024 grew his margin to 13 percentage points. Republicans controlled every statewide executive office (except the state auditor's office), majorities in both chambers of the state legislature, and the entire congressional delegation. Incumbent Senator Joni Ernst was first elected as part of the 2014 red wave and was reelected in 2020.
In the latter half of her second term, Ernst came under increasing pressure. In December 2024, she faced pushback from Republicans for her skepticism of Pete Hegseth's nomination for Secretary of Defense. She later sparked controversy for replying "we are all going to die" when a constituent confronted her for deaths that could be caused by cuts to Medicaid and SNAP, which she supported as part of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.
In September 2025, Ernst announced that she would not seek reelection, officially citing family obligations, although her decision was interpreted in light of previous controversies. The resulting open seat was expected to make the race more competitive.
Italics indicate a declined candidate.
| Campaign finance reports as of April 18, 2026 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Candidate | Raised | Spent | Cash on hand |
| Jim Carlin (R) | $293,966 | $279,387 | $14,578 |
| Ashley Hinson (R) | $7,267,266 | $2,679,198 | $6,516,143 |
| Joni Ernst (R) | $6,954,692 | $5,485,942 | $1,997,164 |
| Source: Federal Election Commission | |||
| Poll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size |
Margin of error |
Ashley Hinson |
Jim Carlin |
Undecided |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JMC Analytics (R) | May 27–28, 2026 | 550 (A) | ± 4.2% | 58% | 19% | 23% |
Joni Ernst vs. "Someone Else"
| Poll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size |
Margin of error |
Joni Ernst |
Someone Else |
Undecided |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victory Insights (R) | December 6–7, 2024 | 600 (LV) | – | 48% | 27% | 26% |

| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | Ashley Hinson | 153,059 | 74.2 | |
| Republican | Jim Carlin | 53,196 | 25.8 | |
| Total votes | 206,255 | 100.0 | ||
Italics indicate withdrawn candidate
| Campaign finance reports as of April 18, 2026 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Candidate | Raised | Spent | Cash on hand |
| Nathan Sage (D) | $1,432,562 | $1,432,459 | $102 |
| Josh Turek (D) | $2,808,701 | $2,051,221 | $757,480 |
| Zach Wahls (D) | $3,167,670 | $2,112,265 | $1,055,405 |
| Jackie Norris (D) | $363,563 | $363,563 | $0 |
| J. D. Scholten (D) | $213,415 | $205,271 | $8,144 |
| Source: Federal Election Commission | |||
| Poll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size |
Margin of error |
Josh Turek |
Zach Wahls |
Other | Undecided |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Public Policy Polling (D) | May 20–21, 2026 | 672 (LV) | ± 3.8% | 52% | 31% | – | 17% |
| Public Policy Polling (D) | May 5–6, 2026 | 764 (LV) | ± 3.6% | 53% | 27% | – | 20% |
| Public Policy Polling (D) | April 23, 2026 | – (LV) | – | 41% | 23% | – | 36% |
| FM3 Research (D) | April 21–23, 2026 | 600 (LV) | ± 4.0% | 48% | 28% | – | 24% |
| Bedrock Polling | March 26, 2026 | 1,022 (LV) | ± 3.2% | 38% | 56% | – | 6% |
| FM3 Research (D) | March 11–14, 2026 | 600 (LV) | ± 4.0% | 25% | 34% | – | 41% |
| GQR (D) | February 18–22, 2026 | 605 (LV) | – | 24% | 42% | – | 34% |
| NRSC (R) | February 16–18, 2026 | 1,923 (LV) | ± 2.5% | 23% | 30% | 5% | 42% |

| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | Josh Turek | 120,287 | 62.7 | |
| Democratic | Zach Wahls | 71,663 | 37.3 | |
| Total votes | 191,950 | 100.0 | ||
On June 2, the Laehn campaign submitted nearly 10,000 signatures to the Iowa Secretary of State, satisfying the 3,500 signature requirement to qualify for the ballot. Laehn was added to the candidate list as the Libertarian Party's candidate.
| Campaign finance reports as of April 18, 2026 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Candidate | Raised | Spent | Cash on hand |
| Thomas Laehn (L) | $42,944 | $37,430 | $5,513 |
| Source: Federal Election Commission | |||
According to The Daily Iowan, the cost of living, inflation, tariffs, health-care affordability, agriculture, and AI data centers are contested issues of the campaign. Debates focused on which candidate was most capable to handle the American affordability crisis. Turek has said he would reverse the Medicaid spending cuts passed under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. Hinson supported the cuts as fiscally responsible as well as Trump's tariffs.
Hinson ran on socially conservative policies, opposing a legal right to have an abortion with exceptions for rape, incest, and the life of the mother and LGBTQ movements. Turek supports restoring the abortion protections that Roe v. Wade previously provided, by passing a federal law. He claimed that Iowa's six-week abortion ban reduced OB-GYN services available. Turek affirmed conservative policies on guns, transgender rights, and immigration.
Turek criticized the concentration of artificial intelligence technology in the hands of a few companies. He supports regulating data centers, opposes tax breaks for their operators, and "safeguards" for the technology. Hinson is in favor of AI development, and says that preparation for workers is necessary to adapt to AI job losses. She said an "AI economy" is necessary to win an American-Chinese AI arms race, "because the truth is: if we don't, China will."
| Source | Ranking | As of |
|---|---|---|
| ABC News | Tossup | October 26, 2026 |
| CBS News | Lean R | October 30, 2026 |
| The Cook Political Report | Tossup | November 2, 2026 |
| Decision Desk HQ | Tossup | November 2, 2026 |
| The Economist | Lean R | November 2, 2026 |
| FiftyPlusOne | Tossup | November 2, 2026 |
| Fox News | Tossup | November 1, 2026 |
| Inside Elections | Tossup | October 29, 2026 |
| MS NOW | Lean R | October 29, 2026 |
| NBC News | Tossup | November 2, 2026 |
| RealClearPolitics | Tossup | November 2, 2026 |
| Sabato's Crystal Ball | Lean R | November 2, 2026 |
| Silver Bulletin | Tossup | November 2, 2026 |
| Split Ticket | Tossup | November 2, 2026 |
| Campaign finance reports as of October 14, 2026 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Candidate | Raised | Spent | Cash on hand |
| Ashley Hinson (R) | $14,147,973 | $13,903,059 | $2,172,989 |
| Josh Turek (D) | $24,290,521 | $21,217,670 | $3,072,851 |
| Thomas Laehn (L) | $83,667 | $74,632 | $9,035 |
| Source: Federal Election Commission | |||
Aggregate polls
| Source of poll aggregation |
Dates administered |
Dates updated |
Ashley Hinson (R) |
Josh Turek (D) |
Other/ Undecided |
Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 270toWin | October 16 – November 1, 2026 | November 3, 2026 | 46.8% | 47.7% | 5.5% | Turek +0.9% |
| Decision Desk HQ | through November 1, 2026 | November 3, 2026 | 47.3% | 47.0% | 5.7% | Hinson +0.3% |
| FiftyPlusOne | through November 1, 2026 | November 3, 2026 | 47.2% | 47.8% | 5.0% | Turek +0.6% |
| RealClearPolitics | October 13 – November 1, 2026 | November 2, 2026 | 47.1% | 47.1% | 5.8% | Tie |
| Silver Bulletin | through November 1, 2026 | November 3, 2026 | 46.7% | 47.7% | 5.6% | Turek +1.0% |
| Average | 47.0% | 47.5% | 5.5% | Turek +0.5% | ||
| Poll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size |
Margin of error |
Ashley Hinson (R) |
Josh Turek (D) |
Other | Undecided |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AtlasIntel | October 28 – November 1, 2026 | 1,219 (LV) | ± 3.0% | 46% | 51% | 3% | 0% |
| New York Times/Siena University | October 26 – November 1, 2026 | 705 (LV) | ± 4.7% | 47% | 48% | 0% | 5% |
| GrayHouse (R) | October 28–31, 2026 | 601 (LV) | ± 4.0% | 48% | 46% | 2% | 4% |
| Rasmussen Reports (R) | October 27–31, 2026 | 901 (LV) | ± 3.0% | 47% | 46% | 3% | 5% |
| YouGov | October 26–29, 2026 | 2,020 (LV) | ± 3.1% | 49% | 50% | 1% | 0% |
| co/efficient (R) | October 28, 2026 | 1,020 (LV) | ± 3.1% | 48% | 46% | 1% | 5% |
| Echelon Insights (R) | October 16–23, 2026 | 403 (LV) | ± 6.5% | 43% | 45% | 7% | 3% |
| InsiderAdvantage (R) | October 21–22, 2026 | 1,200 (LV) | ± 2.8% | 47% | 45% | — | 8% |
| co/efficient (R) | October 15–19, 2026 | 863 (LV) | ± 3.3% | 48% | 45% | 2% | 6% |
| 49% | 46% | — | 5% | ||||
| Trafalgar Group (R) | October 13–15, 2026 | 1,094 (LV) | ± 2.9% | 46% | 44% | 4% | 6% |
| GS Strategy Group (R)/ New River Strategies (D) |
October 9–13, 2026 | 602 (LV) | — | 44% | 46% | 8% | 2% |
| NPA Polling | October 8–12, 2026 | 678 (LV) | ± 3.8% | 47% | 44% | 4% | 5% |
| 48% | 47% | — | 4% | ||||
| YouGov | October 6–12, 2026 | 2,245 (LV) | ± 3.1% | 46% | 47% | 2% | 4% |
| Marist University | October 8–11, 2026 | —(LV) | ± 6.6% | 45% | 48% | 3% | 4% |
| 1,100 (RV) | ± 4.5% | 44% | 51% | 2% | 3% | ||
| Emerson College | October 5–6, 2026 | 650 (LV) | ± 3.8% | 47% | 45% | 2% | 7% |
| SSRS | September 29 – October 5, 2026 | 801 (LV) | ± 4.2% | 45% | 43% | 11% | — |
| Suffolk University | October 1–4, 2026 | 500 (LV) | ± 4.4% | 44% | 48% | 3% | 6% |
| New York Times/Siena University | September 22 – October 1, 2026 | 606 (LV) | ± 4.6% | 48% | 47% | — | 5% |
| Rasmussen Reports (R) | September 28–30, 2026 | 1,048 (LV) | ± 3.0% | 43% | 47% | 3% | 7% |
| Quantus Insights (R) | September 28–29, 2026 | 738 (LV) | ± 3.8% | 47% | 46% | 2% | 5% |
| 49% | 47% | – | 4% | ||||
| 51% | 49% | – | – | ||||
| Beacon Research (D)/ Shaw & Co. Research (R) |
September 24–28, 2026 | 1,008 (LV) | ± 3.0% | 47% | 49% | — | 4% |
| 1,204 (RV) | ± 2.5% | 46% | 50% | — | 4% | ||
| InsiderAdvantage (R) | September 22–23, 2026 | 1,200 (LV) | ± 2.8% | 46% | 47% | 3% | 4% |
| Marist University | September 17–20, 2026 | 1,050 (RV) | ± 4.4% | 42% | 50% | 2% | 5% |
| Trafalgar Group (R) | September 16–18, 2026 | 1,089 (LV) | ± 2.9% | 44% | 42% | 3% | 10% |
| co/efficient (R) | September 14–16, 2026 | 831 (LV) | ± 3.4% | 46% | 42% | 2% | 9% |
| 48% | 43% | – | 9% | ||||
| Cygnal (R) | September 9–11, 2026 | 500 (LV) | ± 4.4% | 43% | 43% | 4% | 10% |
| Rasmussen Reports (R) | September 8–10, 2026 | 1,031 (LV) | ± 3.0% | 40% | 45% | 4% | 11% |
| YouGov | September 3–8, 2026 | 2,169 (RV) | ± 3.5% | 43% | 44% | 3% | 11% |
| 2,041 (LV) | ± 3.5% | 43% | 47% | 1% | 8% | ||
| Emerson College | August 31 – September 1, 2026 | 750 (LV) | ± 3.6% | 50% | 45% | 1% | 5% |
| Global Strategy Group (D) | August 27–31, 2026 | 800 (LV) | ± 3.5% | 42% | 46% | 6% | 6% |
| Abacus Data | August 26–28, 2026 | 323 (LV) | — | 45% | 54% | 1% | — |
| 500 (RV) | ± 4.4% | 46% | 52% | 2% | — | ||
| Suffolk University | August 20–23, 2026 | 500 (LV) | ± 4.4% | 45% | 41% | 4% | 10% |
| Emerson College | August 2–4, 2026 | 712 (LV) | ± 3.7% | 48% | 45% | — | 6% |
| Beacon Research (D)/ Shaw & Co. Research (R) |
June 23–27, 2026 | 1,003 (RV) | ± 3.0% | 46% | 50% | — | 4% |
| New York Times/Siena University | June 15–27, 2026 | 600 (LV) | ± 4.7% | 48% | 46% | — | 5% |
| Cygnal (R) | June 16–19, 2026 | 600 (LV) | ± 4.0% | 46% | 44% | — | 10% |
| Global Strategy Group (D) | June 8–11, 2026 | 1,000 (LV) | ± 3.1% | 45% | 47% | — | 8% |
| Public Policy Polling (D) | June 3–4, 2026 | 557 (RV) | ± 4.2% | 46% | 46% | — | 7% |
| Primary elections | |||||||
| Echelon Insights (R) | April 3–9, 2026 | 377 (LV) | ± 6.6% | 45% | 46% | — | 9% |
| GQR (D) | March 10–16, 2026 | 1,200 (LV) | ± 2.8% | 47% | 43% | — | 11% |
| Change Research (D) | January 8–11, 2026 | 1,108 (LV) | — | 44% | 41% | 1% | 14% |
Ashley Hinson vs. Nathan Sage
| Poll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size |
Margin of error |
Ashley Hinson (R) |
Nathan Sage (D) |
Other | Undecided |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Change Research (D) | January 8–11, 2026 | 1,108 (LV) | — | 44% | 41% | 1% | 14% |
Ashley Hinson vs. Zach Wahls
| Poll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size |
Margin of error |
Ashley Hinson (R) |
Zach Wahls (D) |
Other | Undecided |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Echelon Insights (R) | April 3–9, 2026 | 377 (LV) | ± 6.6% | 44% | 46% | — | 10% |
| GQR (D) | March 10–16, 2026 | 1,200 (LV) | ± 2.8% | 47% | 44% | — | 9% |
| Change Research (D) | January 8–11, 2026 | 1,108 (LV) | — | 44% | 41% | 2% | 13% |
Joni Ernst vs. Jackie Norris
| Poll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size |
Margin of error |
Joni Ernst (R) |
Jackie Norris (D) |
Undecided |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Public Policy Polling (D) | August 18–19, 2025 | 572 (V) | ± 4.1% | 45% | 42% | 13% |
Joni Ernst vs. Nathan Sage
| Poll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size |
Margin of error |
Joni Ernst (R) |
Nathan Sage (D) |
Undecided |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Public Policy Polling (D) | August 18–19, 2025 | 572 (V) | ± 4.1% | 45% | 41% | 14% |
Joni Ernst vs. Josh Turek
| Poll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size |
Margin of error |
Joni Ernst (R) |
Josh Turek (D) |
Undecided |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Public Policy Polling (D) | August 18–19, 2025 | 572 (V) | ± 4.1% | 45% | 41% | 14% |
Joni Ernst vs. Zach Wahls
| Poll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size |
Margin of error |
Joni Ernst (R) |
Zach Wahls (D) |
Undecided |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Public Policy Polling (D) | August 18–19, 2025 | 572 (V) | ± 4.1% | 43% | 42% | 15% |
Joni Ernst vs. Generic Democrat
| Poll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size |
Margin of error |
Joni Ernst (R) |
Generic Democrat |
Undecided |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Public Policy Polling (D) | June 2–3, 2025 | 568 (V) | ± 4.1% | 45% | 43% | 12% |
Generic Republican vs. Generic Democrat
| Poll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size |
Margin of error |
Generic Republican |
Generic Democrat |
Undecided |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| co/efficient (R) | September 14–16, 2026 | 831 (LV) | ± 3.4% | 48% | 43% | 9% |
| No. | Date | Host | Moderators | Link | Participants | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P Participant A Absent N Non-invitee I Invitee W Withdrawn | ||||||
| Josh Turek | Ashley Hinson | |||||
| 1 | October 7, 2026 | Iowa PBS | Kay Henderson | PBS | P | P |
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | Josh Turek | 686,486 | 50.51% | +5.36% | |
| Republican | Ashley Hinson | 630,615 | 46.40% | −5.34% | |
| Libertarian | Thomas Laehn | 42,086 | 3.09% | +0.88% | |
| Total votes | 1,359,187 | 100.0 | |||
| Democratic gain from Republican | |||||
Counties that flipped from Republican to Democratic:
Partisan clients
Speculation swirled among MAGA-minded Republicans in Iowa who suggested on social media that Lake would be a strong potential primary challenger to Ernst...Lake's spokesperson Alex Nicoll told The Arizona Republic after news of the event that she's not planning to be a political candidate.
{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: deprecated archival service (link){{cite news}}: CS1 maint: deprecated archival service (link){{cite web}}: CS1 maint: deprecated archival service (link)Democratic state Rep. Josh Turek, a Paralympic gold medalist basketball player running for Senate, and Iowa state auditor Rob Sand, the Democratic nominee for governor, both frame their opposition to data centers as holding large corporations accountable. "We want to make sure large corporations are paying their fair share, not getting tax breaks," Turek told reporters on Sept. 21 during a campaign stop in Des Moines. "I think also making sure we've got strong guardrails to make sure they are not driving up the energy rate to the end user."
Turek said that AI will fundamentally transform our society. "I agree we should not cede the ground to China," he said, but added that Americans need protections for jobs and more. "I am absolutely in favor of some regulations on data centers," Turek said, while calling for no more tax breaks for companies.