This article includes a list of general references but lacks sufficient corresponding inline citations. (August 2023) |
| Part of a series on |
| Neoplatonism |
|---|
|
|
The Reply to Porphyry, also known under its abbreviated Latin title De Mysteriis Aegyptiorum (On the Egyptian Mysteries; or often simply De Mysteriis), is a work of Neoplatonic philosophy primarily concerned with ritual and theurgy and attributed to Iamblichus.
Porphyry is known to have had a disagreement with Iamblichus over the practice of theurgy, and the Reply to Porphyry consists mainly of Iamblichus' responses to the criticisms of his teacher.
The full original title of the treatise is "Reply of Master Abamon to Porphyry's Letter to Anebo, and Solutions to the Difficulties Contained Therein" (in Greek: Ἀβάμωνος διδασκάλου πρὸς τὴν Πορφυρίου πρὸς Ἀνεβὼ ἐπιστολὴν ἀπόκρισις καὶ τῶν ἐν αὐτῇ ἀπορημάτων λύσεις). The humanist Marsilio Ficino, who was the first to study the text in modern times and wrote an extensive set of notes on it, renamed it "On the Mysteries of the Egyptians, Chaldeans, and Assyrians" (in Latin: De mysteriis Aegyptiorum, Chaldaeorum, Assyriorum); Ficinus' paraphrase was published (Venice 1497) by the editor Aldo Manuzio under this title, and Iamblichus' treatise was mostly referred to with this name or its abbreviated form De mysteriis Aegyptiorum or simply De mysteriis in the subsequent centuries. The history of the title has been studied by the most recent editors of the treatise, Henry-Dominique Saffrey, Alain-Philippe Segonds and Adrien Lecerf, who have shown that the traditional title relies on no manuscript authority and have therefore reverted to the original title (abbreviated as "Réponse à Porphyre", Reply to Porphyry). The latter or its abbreviated form are adopted also in other standard reference works on the subject, like the entry on Iamblichus in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The work presents itself as the "Reply of Master Abamon to Porphyry's Letter to Anebo". However, according to an anonymous scholion, contained in the two most important manuscripts of the work and ascribed to the byzantine writer Michael Psellos by Martin Sicherl [de], Proclus stated in his commentary on Plotinus' Enneads that the author of the treatise was Iamblichus, who hid himself under the name of Master Abamon. While, starting from the 18th century, some doubts were raised about its authorship, the attribution to Iamblichus is nowadays widely accepted by scholars, including the most recent editors.
In its systematic attempt to give a speculative justification of the polytheistic cult practices of the day, the treatise marks a turning-point in the history of thought where Iamblichus stood.
There are 10 books in the work, of which the longest are Books 1 and 3. The contents of the books are.
{{cite book}}: ISBN / Date incompatibility (help)