In human resources and occupational psychology, resenteeism refers to a phenomenon where employees remain in roles they find deeply dissatisfying, resulting in feelings of resentment, anger, and entrapment. This state typically occurs when individuals perceive a lack of alternative employment options or are concerned about the financial and professional risks associated with a career change. While the term is contemporary, the underlying behaviour is classified in academic literature as a form of work disengagement, which involves the cognitive, emotional, and physical distancing of oneself from a work role.
The term is a portmanteau of "resentment", "absenteeism" and "presenteeism". It was coined by the staff management software provider RotaCloud and gained significant cultural momentum in 2023 through social media platforms such as TikTok.
Resenteeism is regarded as an evolution of "quiet quitting"- the practice of doing the bare minimum required by a contract. While quiet quitting often serves as a survival strategy to reclaim work-life balance, resenteeism is distinguished by its more active emotional state of frustration and disillusionment. It emerged prominently following the COVID-19 pandemic and the subsequent Great Resignation, representing the psychological state of workers who did not leave their positions but felt increasingly embittered by deteriorating workplace conditions, the loss of remote flexibility and the rising cost of living.
Individuals experiencing resenteeism are often described as being "checked-out" or "phoning it in". Because they feel trapped by financial obligations, their dissatisfaction manifests through specific observable behaviours.
The COR framework posits that individuals strive to obtain and protect valued "resources", such as time, energy and mental health. Resenteeism is interpreted as a functional coping response; when an employee feels their resources are being threatened or depleted by a toxic environment, they disengage and "withdraw" to prevent further loss of their remaining mental and physical energy.
The JD-R model (Demerouti et al., 2001; Schaufeli & Bakker, 2004) distinguishes between job demands, e.g., workload, and job resources, e.g., autonomy. Resenteeism is often triggered by an imbalance where demands exceed available resources, leading to exhaustion and disengagement. Longitudinal research suggests that an increase in workload, a challenge stressor, can actually drive organisational cynicism if it is not balance by an increase in autonomy or support.
This theory focuses on "within-person changes" over time (Gao-Urhahn et al., 2016). It suggests that employees are more affected by the deterioration of their work conditions, such as a sudden loss of autonomy, than by having a consistently "bad" job. This explains why resenteeism spiked post-pandemic: the sharp shift from remote flexibility back to rigid office mandates created a negative "momentum" that fueled resentment.
Research identifies a typology of causes for resenteeism, categorised into three levels:
To address resenteeism, researchers and HR professionals recommend shifting away from rigid performance management toward fostering human connection.