Retroflex click

Retroflex click type
𝼊  𝼊𐞷  ψ
Encoding
Entity (decimal)𝼊​ψ
Unicode (hex)U+1DF0A U+03C8
Tenuis retroflex click
(velar)
k𝼊   kψ
ᵏ𝼊   ᵏψ
𝼊   ψ
Voiced retroflex click
(velar)
ɡ𝼊   ɡψ
ᶢ𝼊   ᶢψ
𝼊̬   ψ̬
Retroflex nasal click
(velar)
ŋ𝼊   ŋψ
ᵑ𝼊   ᵑψ
𝼊̃   ψ̃
Tenuis retroflex click
(uvular)
q𝼊   qψ
𐞥𝼊   𐞥ψ
Voiced retroflex click
(uvular)
ɢ𝼊   ɢψ
𐞒𝼊   𐞒ψ
Retroflex nasal click
(uvular)
ɴ𝼊   ɴψ
ᶰ𝼊   ᶰψ

The retroflex clicks are a family of click consonants known only from the Central ǃKung language or dialect of Namibia. They are sub-apical retroflex and should not be confused with the more widespread postalveolar clicks, which have also been called "retroflex" (for example in Unicode) due to their concave tongue shape and sometimes apical-retroflex articulation.

The 'implicit' symbol in the International Phonetic Alphabet that represents the forward articulation of these sounds is ⟨𝼊⟩. However, it has only been supported by Unicode since 2021, and usage before then is rare. In the literature, retroflex clicks have typically been written with the ad hoc digraph ⟨‼⟩, the convention since Doke identified them as retroflex in 1925. (Doke's proposed symbol, ⟨ψ⟩, did not catch on, though it has IPA support for historical transcription, nor did Vedder's and Anders' ⟨⦀⟩. For a while Amanda Miller, who noted a lateral fricated release (as had Vedder), transcribed them ⟨ǃ𐞷⟩; with the implicit IPA letter this would be ⟨𝼊𐞷⟩.)

Retroflex clicks are extraordinarily rare. True retroflex clicks occur in at least some dialects of Central ǃKung. They are reconstructed for the Proto-Kxʼa language and tentatively for Proto-Khoe–Kwadi. A nasal retroflex click is reported from Damin.

Retroflex click consonants and their transcription

Basic retroflex clicks in three common transcription conventions are:

Trans. ITrans. IITrans. IIIDescription
(velar)
⟨k͜𝼊⟩ ⟨ᵏ𝼊⟩ ⟨𝼊⟩ tenuis retroflex click
⟨k͜𝼊ʰ⟩ ⟨ᵏ𝼊ʰ⟩ ⟨𝼊ʰ⟩ aspirated retroflex click
⟨ɡ͜𝼊⟩ ⟨ᶢ𝼊⟩ ⟨𝼊̬⟩ voiced retroflex click
⟨ŋ͜𝼊⟩ ⟨ᵑ𝼊⟩ ⟨𝼊̬̃⟩ retroflex nasal click
⟨ŋ̊͜𝼊ʰʰ⟩ ⟨ᵑ̥𝼊ʰʰ⟩ ⟨𝼊̃ʰʰ⟩ aspirated retroflex nasal click
⟨ŋ͜𝼊ˀ⟩ ⟨ᵑ𝼊ˀ⟩ ⟨𝼊̃ˀ⟩ glottalized retroflex nasal click
(uvular)
⟨q͜𝼊⟩ ⟨𐞥𝼊⟩ ⟨𝼊̴⟩ tenuis retroflex click
⟨q͜𝼊ʰ⟩ ⟨𐞥𝼊ʰ⟩ ⟨𝼊̴ʰ⟩ aspirated retroflex click
⟨ɢ͜𝼊⟩ ⟨𐞒𝼊⟩ ⟨𝼊̴̬⟩ voiced retroflex click
⟨ɴ͜𝼊⟩ ⟨ᶰ𝼊⟩ ⟨𝼊̴̬̃⟩ retroflex nasal click
⟨ɴ̥͜𝼊ʰʰ⟩ ⟨ᶰ̥𝼊ʰʰ⟩ ⟨𝼊̴̃ʰʰ⟩ aspirated retroflex nasal click
⟨ɴ͜𝼊ˀ⟩ ⟨ᶰ𝼊ˀ⟩ ⟨𝼊̴̃ˀ⟩ glottalized retroflex nasal click

Features

Features of retroflex clicks:

Occurrence

As with other click articulations, retroflex clicks may be produced with various manners. An example is the voiced retroflex click in the Grootfontein ǃKung (Central Juu) word for 'water', [ᶢ𝼊𐞷ú] (g‼ú).

Damin is the only other language known to have had such a sound, though only the nasal click occurred. It occurred as both a single and a doubled consonant, which was articulated twice. It was apico-domal, and no comparison was ever done with the Central Juu articulation.

A retroflex series claimed for Ekoka ǃKung turns out to be domed palatal clicks.

See also

Notes and references

  1. ↑ Scott, Abigail; Miller, Amanda; Namaseb, Levi; Sands, Bonny; Shah, Sheena (June 2, 2010). "Retroflex Clicks in Two Dialects of ǃXung". University of Botswana, Department of African Languages.
  2. ↑ Kirk Miller & Michael Ashby, L2/20-253R Unicode request for IPA modifier letters (b), non-pulmonic.
  3. ↑ The character ⟨𝼊⟩ may be substituted in some fonts with a combining diacritic, such as ⟨ǃ̢⟩ (with U+0322 COMBINING RETROFLEX HOOK BELOW) or ⟨ǃ̨⟩ (with U+0328 COMBINING OGONEK).
  4. ↑ Doke, Clement M. (1925). "An outline of the phonetics of the language of the ʗhũ: Bushman of the North-West Kalahari". Bantu Studies. 2: 129–166. doi:10.1080/02561751.1923.9676181.
  5. ↑ Anders, H.D. (1935). "A note on a South Eastern Bushman dialect". Zeitschrift für Eingeborenen-Sprachen. 25: 81–89.
    —— "The clicks". South African Journal of Science. 33: 926–939. 1937.
  6. ↑ Miller, Amanda (2009). Contrastive Coronal Click Types in !Xung.
  7. ↑ Anne-Maria Fehn & Jorge Rocha (2023) Lost in translation: A historical-comparative reconstruction of Proto-Khoe-Kwadi based on archival data. Diachronica 40:5, p. 609–665.

Further reading