Similarly, Brölemann and Ribaut subsequently proposed subgenera of Schendyla and Brachyschendyla that authorities now reject. In 1912, they introduced not only Echinoschendyla as a subgenus of Schendyla but also Microschendyla and Schizoschendyla as subgenera of Brachyschendyla. In 1930, Brölemann introduced Astenoschendyla as a subgenus of Brachyschendyla. In 2014, however, the Italian biologistsLucio Bonato and Alessandro Minelli deemed all four of these proposed subgenera to be a junior synonyms of Schendyla rather than valid subgenera.
Description
Centipedes in this genus feature two large pores on the basal element (coxopleuron) of each of the ultimate legs. These ultimate legs either feature only rudimentary claws or lack claws altogether. The ultimate legs are also often conspicuously swollen. The claws of the second maxillae feature no more than a few spines, and the sternites lack fields of pores on the posterior segments.
These centipedes are pale and small, ranging from about 1cm to about 4cm in length, with 29 to 57 pairs of legs. The species Schendyla antici is notable for its small size (5mm to 8mm in length) and for having as few as 29 leg pairs (29 pairs in males and 31 in females), the minimum recorded in this genus. Other small species with notably few legs in this genus include S. verneri (reaching only 10mm in length, with 31 pairs), S. megobroba (12mm in length, with 31 pairs in males and 33 in females), S. walachica (15mm in length, with as few as 33 pairs in each sex), S. gracillima (10mm in length, with as few as 35 pairs). S. dalmatica (10mm in length, with 37 pairs in males and 39 in females), S. dentata (12mm in length, with 39 pairs in females), and S. armata (11mm in length, with as few as 33 pairs). The species S. monoeci reaches only 22mm in length but can have as many as 57 leg pairs, the maximum number found in this genus. Descriptions of the species S. vizzavonae report no more than 51 leg pairs, but this species reaches 45mm in length, the maximum size recorded in this genus.
↑Verhoeff, Karl W. (1934). "Beiträge zur Systematik und Geographie der Chilopoden". Zoologische Jahrbücher, Abteilung für Systematik (in German). 66: 1–112 [4].