| This is the request an account guide | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
The Account Creation Interface (or ACI) is an application comprising software that is hosted on the Wikimedia Cloud VPS, and is used to facilitate account creation requests on the English Wikipedia. Editors or users who are unable to create a new Wikipedia account themselves (either due to technical reasons or because their IP address is blocked) can instead use this interface in order to request the creation of an account to be performed on their behalf and then provided for them to use.
This is done by navigating to the account request application form page, filling out all of the required fields, and submitting the Account Request Application (or ARA) for review. From there, a qualified Wikipedia editor with the ability to handle submitted ARAs (referred to as an ACC Tool User) will evaluate and review it for any issues or concerns. After thoroughly reviewing the request and the information provided, and (if applicable) after any questions asked by the ACC Tool User have been addressed and answered by the submitter, the ACC Tool user will approve the request, create the account on behalf of the submitter using the information provided in the ARA, and send the credentials for the account to them.
This page serves as the official Account Creation Interface Standard Operating Procedures Manual (or ACC Standard Operating Procedures, ACC SOP, or simply the ACC guide page), and describes accepted practices, detailed instructions, relevant policies, and required steps and actions that must be followed in regards to the proper access and use of the Account Creation Tool User Interface (or ACC Tool User Interface). This includes, but is not limited to: the proper and correct handling, evaluation, scrutiny, and closing of ARAs (or requests) that are submitted using the Account Request Application Form webpage, and the proper and appropriate access and handling of all non-public information that is provided anywhere within it.
All ACC Tool Users and ACC Tool Administrators are required to review, understand, and reference – as well as obey, follow, fully complete, and remain within compliance of all instructions, processes, steps, procedures, and other requirements detailed and specified on this page – at all times. In addition, All ACC Tool Users and ACC Tool Administrators are required to obey, follow, and remain within compliance of all Wikipedia policies and guidelines specified on this project at all times. These requirements are strictly enforced and are a condition of holding ACC Tool User or ACC Tool Administrator permissions on the Account Creation Interface.
This section provides important information, details, requirements, and instructions for editors who are interested in joining the project as an ACC Tool User, or who are registering an ACC tool account in order to access the interface as an approved ACC Tool User.
It is important for new or prospective ACC Tool Users to familiarize themselves with the common ACC terms are used throughout Wikipedia ACC pages, the Account Creation Interface, the internal Tool User Interface, and in internal and external communications between ACC team members and outside editors and users. The common ACC terms used throughout the interface are listed, defined, and detailed below:
This section lists, describes, and details each of the requirements that must be completed before requesting ACC Tool User access, as well as each of the minimum requirements that must be met in order for any ACC Tool User requests to be considered for approval.
Editors must complete all of the following requirements listed below before requesting ACC Tool User access:
For an open ACC Tool User access request to be considered for approval, editors must meet all of the following minimum requirements below:
This list is not exhaustive; its purpose is to describe and detail the important minimum requirements, primary qualifications, and level of experience that ACC Tool Administrators will typically search for, locate, verify, consider, and take into account when reviewing open ACC Tool User requests and prospective candidates for consideration and approval. Finally, the acceptance, consideration, and approval of new ACC Tool User requests are subject to the discretion, judgment, and opinion of the reviewing ACC Tool Administrator or the ACC Tool Administrator team, and is primarily based on the candidate's tenure, demonstrable knowledge and experience, history and conduct, established trustworthiness, competence, and the apparent need for more ACC Tool Users.
After satisfying all of the qualifications and requirements listed above, you must create and register a new ACC Tool account here if you don't already have one. When your registration is complete, your ACC Tool account and user information will then added to the list of open ACC Tool User access requests. You must then follow the instructions below in order to connect your ACC Tool account with your Wikipedia account.
The tool will prompt you to connect your ACC Tool account to your Wikipedia account. This is done using the OAuth protocol, which grants the ACC tool with permission, as well as the necessary rights, to perform certain actions on Wikipedia, and on your behalf. This is primarily used to gain a cryptographically signed identity ticket from Wikipedia verifying that you have control of an account on Wikipedia. All tool users are required to connect their ACC Tool account to Wikipedia, but granting any additional permissions that are not necessary for completing this process are optional. This process must be completed before an ACC tool account can be approved for ACC Tool User access.
You can see the information the tool stores about your on-wiki identity from your tool preferences.
If your ACC Tool User access request is approved by an ACC Tool Administrator, you will be notified of the approval through a message that's sent to the email address that you used to register your ACC Tool account, as well as a new message that's left on your English Wikipedia account's user talk page.
If you have an ACC Tool account where the request for ACC Tool User access was declined, you need to submit an appeal by completing this form in order to have your ACC Tool account reviewed as an ACC Tool User access request again. Please wait a reasonable amount of time before appealing an account decline or suspension decision. In addition, excessive appeal requests without taking enough time to properly consider and address the original reasons that resulted in denial of your request will not be reviewed again or given consideration. Please do not create a duplicate new ACC Tool account, or create more than one ACC Tool account for yourself.
After logging into the ACC Tool User interface with your ACC Tool User account, you will be navigated to the main interface page (see screenshot). This page will show you, among other items, a list of the ACC request queues where open Account Request Applications are saved. Unless empty, each queue will have the number of open requests shown to the right of its display name, just like you'd typically see when viewing email address inbox folders. The number of open requests from each queue, when added together, will give you the total number of all open Account Request Applications that are awaiting review, action, and closure by an ACC Tool User. Clicking on one of the request queues will expand it, displaying a list of the open Account Request Applications currently located there. Each Account Request Application queue listed on the ACC Tool User main page is detailed below:
Before an ACC Tool User can begin reviewing an open Account Request Application from the queue, they must reserve the request first. This both marks the open request as currently being reviewed to other ACC Tool Users that are logged in, and prevents another ACC Tool User from opening and reviewing it while it's reserved by your account. This is done in order to prevent more than one ACC Tool User from inadvertently spending their time reviewing the same Account Request Application at the same time.
To work on a specific request, click on the green Reserve button. You will be marked as handling the request and be navigated to a page that displays the request information, including the submitter's personally identifying information, so that you can review it for any issues. Buttons are also shown on the page that will allow you to create the account and close the request as 'approved', decline the request with a given reason, or email the submitter with any questions. This guide will detail the process that must be followed when reviewing an open Account Request Application, along with what buttons to click in order to properly handle and close the request, and send an email to the requester with information following the request's closure.
Buttons on the interface and what they do |
|---|
In the header of every page, there are a number of links:
The IP Address links group contains the following links:
This section could take three forms, just a plain list of links if the request was made directly to the tool (almost never the case on the Cloud VPS), or it could have come via a proxy or a set of proxies. For more information on how to interpret these, see this page.
The User name links group contains the following:
You should also check the username. Remember to keep username policy in mind when reviewing a name. Always do a Google search to see if it is the name of a company or organization, which may be considered promotional, indicate a conflict of interest and a violation of Username Policy. If the name is ambiguous, then you should take where the requester's IP Address geolocates to in relation to the relevant company, the requester's email address and the requester's comment into consideration. It is also important to check whether the requested username made any contributions on other Wikimedia Projects. This way you could see whether the requested name forms part of a global account or unified login — if so the account should not be created. When you are pleased with the request you can click the Create! link to create the account.
The Account creation link group contains the following in "manual" mode:
In an automatic mode ("Use my Wikimedia account"), these two buttons are replaced with a single button ("Create and close as Created!") which creates the request in the background, and closes the request with the chosen message. If more than one mode is available to you, you will see a set of radio buttons allowing you to choose the mode to use. If you have automatic welcoming enabled, you will see a switch to disable automatic welcoming for this request only.
The Request Status group contains the possible resolutions that can be given to a request:
The SUL Taken option should be used when the requested name is part of a unified login—such as described in the previous section. If the username is similar to that of somebody on another wiki then the Similar option should be used, and if the username is the same as somebody on another wiki then Taken should be used. When none of the above options describes the particular situation, you should use the Custom option. You would then be prompted for a custom email message that would be sent to the requester. The message you write will form the entire content of the email to the user; don't forget to sign your message with an adequate name. Note: All of these links perform an action on the request and do not link to the relevant policy. All resolutions except the Defer and Drop resolutions send an e-mail to the requester indicating what has happened to the request. If the request was already closed or deferred to account creators, then the Defer to account creators link becomes Defer to users, which returns it to the main queue.
The ban links is only available to the tool administrators and contains the following three ban links:
Ban links can be found in a separate section beneath "Request status" on the zoom page of a request or in the form of a dropdown button on the main interface beside requests in the request queue. Alternatively, tool admins can ban users and review the active ban list on the ban management page.
Tool administrators can change other users' access to the interface via User management. Available options—which vary based on the target user's status, are as follows:
Before adding a template, please check that it takes a signature as a parameter, or not at all. This is to prevent the bot signing as itself, rather than the person who created the account. Also, please add the template to the list here, so should the template appear at TfD or a similar venue and gets deleted, (e.g. here), it is actually shown as used.
To alert other users that a request is already being handled, you must reserve a request to see the full request (unless a tool admin). The tool will not allow you to handle a request which has been reserved by another user and will warn users if they attempt to reserve more than one request. If you need to collaborate with another user on a request, you can use the link titled "reveal to others" to allow other tool users to see the data on the request without needing a reservation. Requests will be automatically unreserved when you close them, however, closed requests can be reserved. All currently reserved requests will show up on one of the statistics pages, accessible by clicking the Statistics link at the top of the page. |

The ACC Tool User interface supports both the manual creation of Wikipedia accounts as well as automatic creation (via OAuth) when reviewing and closing Account Request Application. To support the automatic creation of accounts using the ACC Tool User interface, your account connection must have the "High-volume editing" and "Create accounts" grants enabled (both of which are enabled by default). As of March 2021, the ability to use automatic account creation is also gated behind a separate ACC Tool User Account permission during the process of this functionality being slowly rolled out and deployed for use.
While currently viewing an open Account Request Application (the "View request" page) using the ACC Tool User interface, you should see a set of radio buttons next to the "account creation" buttons. These allow you to choose which method is used when you proceed to create the Wikipedia account for the particular request - either manually (using the existing process), or automatically. You can choose the default method of account creation that is selected for you when reviewing an account request in your preferences, under "Account Creation Mode". The automatic account creation method will handle the creation of the requested account when you click on the "Create and close" button within the interface; all you need to do once you have decided to accept the current open request is choose a close type.
In the background, the ACC Tool User interface will queue the request to be created and closed; you will see the request move to the "Job queue" status, and a creation job will appear in the "Job Queue" page, accessible from the "View job list" button above the request log. If you need to cancel the queued automatic account creation job for any reason, resetting the request will cancel the queued jobs. All request closures with automatic account creations will be given a time delay between the time that the request is added to the queue for execution and when the actual account creation is performed automatically - depending on the exact time the request was queued, this will likely be between two and four minutes.
Custom closes also support automatic account creation. To use automatic creation with a custom close, choose the "Create account & close request as created" option under "Action to take".
In the case of an account creation failure (for example, if an AntiSpoof hit is detected), the request will be deferred to a "hospital" queue and an announcement will be made by the bot on IRC. If this happens, you can check the list of jobs in order to discover exactly why the automatic account creation failed, and handle the creation manually from there. The most common cause of an automatic account creation failure is an antispoof or title blacklist hit, and the tool will not attempt to resolve this for you. In these situations, falling back to the manual account creation method will be required in order to resolve and close the request.
The ACC Tool User interface can automatically leave a welcome template message on the user talk page of any new users that you create a Wikipedia account for. While this functionality has existed for several years by utilizing a bot in order to perform the edit and welcome the new user, utilization of the bot was deprecated in favor of the current system - which uses your user account (via OAuth) to perform the same task.
To support the feature automatically welcoming new users, your OAuth connection to your Wikipedia account must have both the "High-volume editing" and the "Create, edit, and move pages" grants enabled (again, both of these grants are enabled by default). You must also choose the welcome template that you'd like to use in your new messages to new users by navigating to the "Welcome Template Management" page. If the template that you wish to use is not listed, please contact an ACC Tool User administrator for help, or ask Oshwah to add it for you.
Once you have chosen a template, every user that you create an account for while closing an open request using the ACC Tool User interface will automatically have their user talk page created with that welcome template added as the message. Additionally, a new switch will appear beside the creation button allowing you to skip sending the new user a welcome message for the specific request.
As with the automatic account creation method described above: in the case of a new user welcoming failure (for example, if the user account does not exist or the user talk page already exists), a job failure will be noted in the job queue, and an announcement will be made by the bot on IRC. If this happens, you can check the list of jobs to discover exactly why the automatic welcoming failed, and handle this manually if you so choose.
All Account Request Applications that are received and listed on the ACC Tool User interface are from users who couldn't create a new Wikipedia account for themselves using the account creation form, and we need to react thoughtfully with this in mind at all times.
It's perfectly acceptable to find yourself in the middle of a situation or a request and be unsure with how to proceed or not know which action you should take, and you will not be looked down upon, judged negatively, or harassed for asking other members of the team for a second pair of eyes or for assistance with a request. You will be seen in a much more positive light by others for asking a stupid question, requesting assistance with a request that's elementary, and handling the request properly and correctly vs not asking for help (for one reason or another) and incorrectly handling, processing, and closing a request.
There are always other ACC tool interface users online to confer with; the private IRC Channel for ACC tool users is available for use, and typically all users who are currently joined to that channel will be more than willing to assist you in situations such as these: #wikipedia-en-accounts connect. In the event you don't receive a satisfactory response from someone, and if you still do not know which course of action to take in order to properly handle and resolve an open request, it is absolutely essential that you defer the request to other user for resolution rather than to undertake a wrong course of action and process the request incorrectly or improperly. If you ask another ACC tool user for help with an open request and if they need to see the private data contained within it in order to help you, you will need to provide them with the URL of the link shown on the 'zoom' page.
The process of handling, reviewing, and closing open Account Request Applications is not a race! It is essential that all of the required checks are performed for each open Account Request Application in order to ensure that they are correctly handled, and the requested account is either approved and created when they should be, or declined if all of the necessary requirements are not met. ACC Tool Administrators have access to extended logs, account request data and tools, and other administrative and analytical information for smooth running of the project, and they typically review and audit closed requests regularly as part of their duties. If administrative ACC logs, timestamps, analytics and graphs, or other information indicates that you are rushing through open Account Request Applications, appear to be handling requests at a concerning or reckless rate of speed, or have closed a high volume of requests in a very short span of time (for example, at a rate where carefully performing all of the required checks would be unfeasible), you may be brought into a discussion and questioned by an ACC Tool Administrator, and (in extreme or non-ambiguous cases) you may have your access to the tool suspended or revoked - even if no explicit violations of policy and no reports of incorrect ACC request actions and closures have occurred.
The ACC tool contains personally identifying information and is subject to the privacy policy of the foundation. It cannot be shared outside of the interface.
Personally identifying information includes, but is not limited to:
In order to comply with Data retention policy:
Additionally, any action that might produce the following is prohibited:
Users who violate this rule and share any personally identifying information outside the ACC tool interface risk immediate and indefinite suspension, as well as the possibility of their identified status being revoked.
If you reserve a request and then need to go offline without completing the request, please break the reservation beforehand, so that another user can complete the request, unless you have good reason to require the request to be handled by yourself, in which case you must leave a comment. If you do not do this, the request will remain reserved and cannot be created by other users; a tool admin may forcefully break the reservation if you have left no indication as to why you need to keep the request reserved.
In addition, if you are actively working on a request that you have reserved and it's taking some time to handle (generally, more than an hour), please leave a comment on the request indicating that you are working on it and what the issue delaying handling of the request is. This informs other users and admins that you are busy on the request and that you haven't forgotten about it.
In cases where a user has had a request reserved for a long time and they have left a comment explaining the long reservation time, a reasonable effort should be made to contact them before the request is broken. However, requests reserved without explanation for a long time may be broken by an admin without warning, especially if the user holding the reservation can't be found or reached quickly on IRC.
Using a script or other program to automatically handle requests in any way outside that which the tool provides (includes reserving) is prohibited. If you are found to be using automation of any kind or if evidence strongly supports the probability that you are doing so, you risk account suspension for violation of this rule. Using an automated add-on or script to refresh the tool interface page, however, is allowed. The refresh time must be considerate to the interface's resources and kept to as low of a rate as possible. Please keep the rate to once a minute maximum. The #wikipedia-en-accounts channel on IRC contains a live feed of new requests and changes made to them by tool users. This feed is the preferred method to view and monitor than using the interface and any automatic page refreshing tools.
For security purposes, ACC Tool accounts are routinely checked for activity, and ACC Tool User access is revoked from any account that is deemed to be idle. An ACC Tool account is considered to be idle if 90 days have passed since the user last logged into it. Access to all ACC Tool User interface pages, requests, functions, and mediums (including access to the private #wikipedia-en-accounts channel on IRC for ACC Tool Users) are revoked at this time. A revocation for inactivity is logged when such a revocation is performed so that other ACC Tool Administrators are aware of the reason.
Having ACC Tool User access revoked due to inactivity is not punitive and does not impact your overall standing as an ACC Tool User. If your ACC Tool account's ACC Tool User permissions are revoked due to inactivity and you decide to return later, simply contact an ACC Tool Administrator in order to request reinstatement of your account. You will need to resubscribe your email address to the ACC mailing list and let the ACC Tool Administrator know that you've done this. An ACC Tool Administrator will verify that your account is still listed on the nonpublic personal data policy noticeboard page as having sign the confidentiality agreement for access to nonpublic information, that you're subscribed to the ACC mailing list, your ACC Tool User access was revoked due to inactivity, and that your overall status was in good standing at the time of the revocation. After this is done, an ACC Tool Administrator will perform the necessary procedure in order to reinstate and restore ACC Tool User access onto your ACC account.
You should check for multiple requests from an IP address or an email address. To do so, click on the request ID button or click on "Zoom" in the list of last 5 closed requests, or go to the logs and click a request number. At the end of the request line—like you see normally for all open requests, you will see the UTC date and time the request was submitted. Farther down the page you would also see a list of other requests—if any, from that IP address or e-mail address.
If there are multiple open requests (but no closed requests) from the same email address, it's possible the user wanted to change their requested username. Place all the requests from that email address on hold, and send an email to the user informing the user of Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts, listing the usernames of the requests we have received from them, and asking which one they would prefer. If there are multiple requests from an email but one of them has been recently closed as created, it's probably safe to drop the remaining requests.
Please keep in mind that shared IP addresses are common. If you have multiple requests from the same IP addresses but different email addresses, and the IP is static, defer to CheckUsers; if it's dynamic or otherwise obviously shared (for example, from a residential or mobile/cellular service provider, or an obviously shared IP like a school or library), continue handling the request (though ensure that you check for on-wiki blocks in this case).
Multiple requests to the tool are only grounds for a ban from requesting accounts in cases of clear abuse. If you have reason to think that an IP or email address has requested multiple accounts abusively, please inform a tool admin for further action. In and of itself, though, multiple requests for accounts are not grounds for a ban from ACC.
In cases where there have been a large number of requests from an IP address assigned to a school or other educational institution, especially if each request has a different email address, there is a "Educational Event or Student Edit-A-Thon" custom close template that by default defers the request to "On-Hold". This close is only intended for use in the case when there have been a large number of account requests from an IP assigned to a school, and we need more information about the desired usage of the accounts. For single account requests, use of the account as part of a school assignment or other educational use is not in and of itself grounds for a request to be rejected or held. If you aren't sure if the "Educational Event or Student Edit-A-Thon" custom close applies to a situation, please ask an ACC admin for guidance.
Please keep these points in mind when dealing with requests made from any kind of blocked IP address or range:
When deferring a request to CheckUsers, Stewards, or proxy check, please include a brief statement on the reason for deferral. This is especially true if you are ignoring part of the guide (such as deferring an older school block).
Do not violate policy by adding any personally identifying information in a request comment – it's generally treated the same as if you did so outside of the interface (due to Wikimedia's privacy and data retention policies). See § Personally identifying information for more information.
Unless otherwise noted in this section, all blocks for CheckUser-related reasons must be deferred to CheckUsers.
These are blocks that affect a range of IP addresses, rather than just one. This is typically done to partially or completely block networks that can operate using more than one public IP address.
Any range block (affecting any kind of IP address) can be ignored only if any of the following are true:
{{anonblock}} or {{school block}}, or is for "simple" vandalism with no specific target (i.e., no specific subject or topic is the target of the vandalism) and there is no vandalism within the prior 72 hours of the request being entered at ACC.<!-- ACC ignore --> in the block reason)Any hard (not anon. only) CheckUser block for spam should be declined with the Registered ISP Email or New range email template.
If there is any other range block on the requesting IP (or any indication of sockpuppetry), defer the request to CheckUsers. Users who create accounts from requests that are in such cases and without consulting a CheckUser risk account suspension.
These are blocks that are made to a single IP address, and is commonly done to block single users (such as a residence or network with one public IP address).
Single IP blocks can be ignored if there is a non-recent (i.e., older than 72 hours) block for "simple" vandalism with no specific target (i.e., no specific subject or topic is the target of the vandalism). This includes blocks with the reasons of {{anonblock}} or {{school block}}. The fact that a blocked IP belongs to a school is not in itself an exemption.
If you have a request that you are going to decline or drop due to a single IP block, you need to either:
If you do not have either of these, then defer it to CheckUsers, even if it's already been there.
Check for and address local blocks first.
Any request from an IP address that is blocked with {{blocked proxy}}, {{webhostblock}}, {{colocationwebhost}} or {{zombie proxy}} as the reason should be deferred to the proxy check queue unless you are capable of confirming that the block reason is still valid yourself. If the request's IP is confirmed to be an open proxy, the request should be closed as "Open Proxy". If there's any indication in the block reason, or if anything comes up in other checks, that suggests that the IP address or range was used for sockpuppetry abuse, the request must be deferred to CheckUsers instead.
Soft (anon. only, with or without account creation disabled) P2P proxy/VPN blocks (e.g., {{blocked p2p proxy}}) can be ignored.
Requests stating that editing via a VPN is necessary should be referred to WP:IPECPROXY using the IPBE for VPN email template.
If there is no block indicating that an IP has been blocked as a proxy, be very careful about using the IP Check service on Toolforge or similar services. These services are frequently incorrect in determining proxy status. While other suspicious network activity may be occurring, unless the IP is static, it rarely indicates anything negative towards the user filing the request.
If you are going to defer to proxy check, have evidence not including the IP Check Service, any site listed on the IP Check Service, and any "proxy checker" website. Proper deferrals include a port number that can be tested for proxies or evidence that the ISP provides access to its own servers (web hosting, cloud services & data storage, colocation & IP transit).
All username requests must follow Wikipedia's Username Policy in order to be created. Please refer to this guideline for any policies and procedures that are not explicitly defined here. Creating accounts that violate Wikipedia's username policy will result in account suspension depending on the severity or blatancy of the username violation. Repeated violations of this rule will result in account suspension.
Where the requested username is a real name relating to famous, popular, etc. person the requester's identity needs to verify through the VRT system. The standard in the username policy is that the name or nickname has to relate to a "specific, identifiable" person. In terms of a test for ACC they should be notable enough to have a Wikipedia article; however, having an article doesn't necessarily mean that they are specific and identifiable and that there is a likelihood that someone is trying to impersonate them. If you believe that they are specific and identifiable and that them having the name may cause confusion, you will need to close the request as "Notable Person". If you aren't sure whether the above test is met, consult with a tool admin or experienced user, it is better to create the account in good faith (remembering that they can be blocked) than to send it to VRT to deal with.
Once VRT has verified the identity of the requester, the requester will be sent back to ACC, either by the request being reopened (if possible) with the VRT ticket number provided as a request comment, or by the requester sending in a new request and including the VRT ticket number in the request comment. However, the request must not be handled until someone with VRT access has verified in the request comments that the VRT ticket contains sufficient proof of the requester's identity and is tied to the ACC request (if you have VRT access, you may do this check yourself; just make a note in the request's comments that you verified that the ticket contains sufficient proof of identity and that the email addresses on the account request and the VRT ticket match). Once the ACC request has been positively tied to the VRT ticket, perform all other standard checks, and if everything looks good, create the account. If you create the account successfully and are a VRT user too, add the {{Verified account}} template to the top of the new user's talk page, including the VRT ticket number tied to the ACC request. If you are not a VRT user but still created the account, please as soon as possible ask a VRT user to add the {{Verified account}} template to the new user's talk page – possible venues for making this request include the VRT noticeboard, #wikimedia-vrt connect on IRC, or contacting a VRT user you know directly. Remember to include the name of the user you just created and the relevant VRT ticket number in such a request!
A request containing a VRT ticket number in the comments is not sufficient proof of identity – the validity of any mentioned VRT tickets must be verified by an ACCer with VRT access, with such verification logged in the request comments, before they are accepted!
Requested usernames should only be declined as a username policy violation where it is clear that they are – remember to assume good faith. If you are in doubt, create the account and watch it. If it is engaging in promotional editing, report the user to WP:UAA (as you would with any other promotional username and editing).
If a requested username implies shared use, the request is to be closed because Wikipedia's policy on usernames state that they should not be shared between more than one individual. If you come across a request that implies such, close the request as not created utilizing the "Shared Username" option. This directs them to WP:ISU as well as takes the opportunity to link them to WP:COI, WP:PROMO and more relevant policies or guidelines.
Wikipedia will not allow you to create an account if the requested user name:
This section will explain the procedures and policies when handling requests that meet one of those two situations.
A perfect match conflict occurs when the requested user name is 100% identical to a username that already exists on Wikipedia (this includes capitalization and use of symbols). If you discover that the requested username is a perfect match, then you must decline the request.
Starting in April 2015, all new accounts that are created result in the creation of a Unified Login across all Wikimedia Projects instead of simply creating a local login to one Wikimedia Project site. To prepare for this process change, all local accounts created before April 2015 whose username was taken on another project were automatically renamed, adding ~<Home Project Site> to the end in order to make them unique across all Wikimedia Projects (see the announcement here to learn more). If the requested username was previously taken but was systematically renamed as part of the preparation for SUL Finalization rule change, it will appear as a log entry and list a username such as "RequestedAccount~enwiki" in the User Page and User Creation Log.
If the requested account is taken, but has a different casing ("Apple" versus "APPLE") or otherwise just appears very similar (not an exact match), then refer to the "Too similar" guidelines below.

A Similar Username conflict occurs when the requested user name is similar, but not 100% identical, to another username that exists on Wikipedia. This typically occurs with requests that would normally be a perfect match to an existing account, but differs with capitalization or the use of symbols or other letters that could resemble the spelling of the existing account (i.e. "Jοhn Doe" vs "Jóhn Đoe" or "J0hn Doe"). These "similar" requests will trip the AntiSpoof extension, and flag the request for additional scrutiny under a separate queue ("Flagged user needed"). Although the ACC tool allows any user to reserve and decline requests in the "Flagged user needed" queue, only ACC tool users with the account creator flag are able to override the AntiSpoof check and create the accounts.
ACC requests that are flagged as similar can only be approved if all similar existing accounts are determined to be both unestablished (have less than a total number of local edits, global edits, and log entries) and inactive (no edits or log entries have been made within a certain time period from today). Similar existing accounts are considered both unestablished and inactive only if they meet all of the requirements in the Similar Account Flowchart, or meet all of the requirements listed below:
The ACC request cannot be approved if a similar existing account fails any of the requirements above, and hence is considered to be either established for having 15 or more global contributions, or active because their last edit or log entry was made too recently. Decline the request and use the Too Similar close email template.
If all similar existing accounts meet the requirements and hence are unestablished and inactive, the ACC request can be approved and you can proceed with creating the account (provided you are a flagged user). If you do not have the account creator flag, you must break your reservation to allow a flagged user to create the account. Creating such an account should only be done after you have conducted all relevant checks required for any new account request. In order to create the account, you must check the "Ignore spoofing checks" box on the account creation page. This tells the MediaWiki software to ignore any similar existing accounts that are identified and create the account anyway.
AntiSpoof will also trigger when attempting to create an account with a username that was used before another user was renamed.
Do not override this unless the renamed account could be ignored per the § Too similar flow. If you are unsure, contact a tool admin or place the request in the Steward queue.
For the time being, the Russian Wikipedia is directing account requests to ACC for handling in some cases like CAPTCHA issues. In the medium-term future, once multi-domain support (currently in development) is built in ACC, these will be directed to a separate, isolated ACC domain with requests being handled by volunteers from the Russian Wikipedia and not visible to English Wikipedia volunteers. Until then, however, the requests are being directed to the main application with English Wikipedia requests, but the requests will be directed to a separate "Russian Wikipedia requests" queue.
These requests should be handled in the same way as all other requests, following the guidelines outlined in this document, except that requests should be reviewed from the perspective of the Russian Wikipedia (e.g., consulting ruwiki's block log instead of enwiki's), and if an account is created it should be manually created on ruwiki instead of using the built-in OAuth account creation. Likewise, please exercise increased caution when evaluating these requests and use common sense, but there are otherwise no special handling requirements.
For additional context, please see this comment on the GitHub issue.
If a request reveals through personally identifying information or the comments field that they may have been blocked on another account, proper procedure is to close the request as not created by using the "Block target – appeal" option. This allows the requester to get information on how they can appeal the block on their existing account either through the form of requesting on their talk page, or if unable, emailing the UTRS.
If a request reveals through personally identifying information or the comments field that they may have ties to a company or other entity but the username policy is followed, proper procedure is to close the request as created by using the "COI risk" option. This directly invites the requester to read our relevant policies or guidelines on conflict of interest or promotion. (i.e. WP:BPCA, WP:PSCOI, and WP:PROMOTION)
Once you have reserved a request, and decided that the account should be created, click the Create! link next to the desired username. This will bring you to the MediaWiki account creation form. The name and email will be filled in automatically and the "Use a temporary random password" option will be automatically selected. Do not deselect this option and type in a password. If you do accidentally type in a password and click Create Account, go to Special:PasswordReset, type in the username and click Reset password. Make sure you are logged-in to avoid disclosing your IP to the requester. If a message appears – stating the username is forbidden (example here), defer the request to an account creator who can override the Title blacklist using the "Ignore the blacklist" option. Once an account has been created, click Created! next to the request on the ACC tool.
All custom closes should end with an email signature. It is recommended that you add this to your preferences so it is automatically appended to any request closures you perform. If you do not, then you must add your signature at the end of your message every time you custom close a request.
Important things to note:
Tool administrators (tool admins) are trusted users who can, among other things, edit interface messages (using the Edit! buttons in Message management and Template management), and have access to a fifth option invisible to other users, User management, which allows them to approve, promote, demote, and suspend users. However, abuse of these tools is not tolerated, and the interface is not a toy.
Administrators, in addition to the main mailing list all users are subscribed to, have a private mailing list for discussion of administrative issues of the tool. Any user who wants to report an anomaly with the handling of a request, or otherwise has information they would rather share privately with only the tool admins should send an email directly to that mailing list at enwiki-acc-admins [at] googlegroups [dot] com. Please be patient, as depending on the issue, it may take us a day or two to get back to you.
A list of tool administrators can be found on the tool user list here
The interface developers are the team who have commit access to the tool, and as such can modify the latest development version of the tool in the code repository. If you want something to be changed or added, or find a bug, you can contact one of them, but it's probably better to file a bug in the bug-tracker on GitHub.
The tool roots are stwalkerster and FastLizard4. They have access to the server that runs the tool, and are the only people who can modify the configuration of the tool, and update the tool to a new version. The tool roots also act as the liaison between the Cloud Services administrators, and the rest of the tool users. The tool developers and roots reserve the rights to modify the tool as necessary, and to remove access to the tool for any reason as they see fit.
CheckUsers on Wikipedia will automatically be granted CheckUser-only information and basic administrator capabilities on the tool in order to carry out duties relating to requests requiring a CheckUser. The tool ability is granted by a tool root or another checkuser granting you the "checkuser" role within the user management area.
If there is an urgent need to locate and contact a CheckUser who is currently online and active on Wikipedia, you can do so by requesting the attention of a checkuser on IRC, or by using this tool or this tool to locate a checkuser who is online and currently editing Wikipedia so that you can reach out to them.