Wikipedia:Administrator elections/October 2024

Current status



In October 2024, the first administrator elections were held as a trial process. The community voted on 32 candidates, 11 of whom were successful.

Schedule

Voter eligibility

The trial election used the Arbitration Committee Election suffrage requirements. To vote, an editor must have met the following criteria:

Procedure

The overall process lasted 10 days: an initial 3-day period for discussion and questions, and a 7-day period for a secret ballot vote. Election cycles were advertised in advance, including watchlist notices. Novem Linguae performed the todo list.

Period 1: Candidates sign up

Candidates signed up by a specified date prior to the discussion and questions period. Just like RFA, candidates could be nominated by other editors. During this phase and the SecurePoll setup phase, candidates and nominators could adjust their candidate subpage as they saw fit.

Period 2: Discussion and questions

During this 3-day period, the community asked questions and raised issues, as well as providing positive feedback. Candidates were encouraged to participate in the discussion period, answering questions and responding to feedback.

During this discussion-only time, participants were discouraged from posting messages of support/opposition that lack points for discussion. This phase was for sharing thoughts on the candidate or any other topic that may relate to the candidate's applicability – not for indicating personal voting intentions.

The monitors for this phase were Theleekycauldron and Pickersgill-Cunliffe. Discussion for all candidates can be found at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/October 2024/Discussion phase.

Period 3: Voting

Once the discussion period is complete, a secret ballot was held for 7 days, using SecurePoll. During this period, discussion was closed. The ballot contained multiple candidates; however, this was not a competitive election. Voters were asked to evaluate each candidate individually, and all candidates who met the pass threshold were selected to become administrators. Thus all, some, or even no candidates could have been selected.

Tallying and results

After voting has ended, the election was scrutinised by three stewards whose home wiki is not the English Wikipedia. They checked for any duplicate, ineligible, or sockpuppeteer votes, and struck them as necessary. Once scrutineering was complete, votes were tallied, results were announced, and new admins were granted administrative privileges. The pass threshold was 70% or greater. The vote tally was calculated by Support / (Support + Oppose) for each candidate. The scrutineers for the October 2024 election were Johannnes89, EPIC, and Yahya. The SecurePoll election clerk was JSutherland (WMF). In the October 2024 administrator elections, scrutineering took 4 days.

The results of the October 2024 administrator elections are as follows:

659 votes were cast, of which 43 were determined to be duplicates, leading to a total of 616 valid votes.

Results of the October 2024 administrator elections
Candidate Support Abstain Oppose Support /
(Support + Oppose)
Result
Queen of Hearts (talk · contribs · candidate page · assign permissions) 389 122 105 78.74% Elected
SilverLocust (talk · contribs · candidate page · assign permissions) 347 195 74 82.42% Elected
ThadeusOfNazereth (talk · contribs · candidate page · assign permissions) 321 207 88 78.48% Elected
Rsjaffe (talk · contribs · candidate page · assign permissions) 319 208 89 78.19% Elected
Dr vulpes (talk · contribs · candidate page · assign permissions) 322 195 99 76.48% Elected
Ahecht (talk · contribs · candidate page · assign permissions) 303 219 94 76.32% Elected
SD0001 (talk · contribs · candidate page · assign permissions) 306 209 101 75.18% Elected
DoubleGrazing (talk · contribs · candidate page · assign permissions) 306 206 104 74.63% Elected
Sohom Datta (talk · contribs · candidate page · assign permissions) 298 210 108 73.40% Elected
Peaceray (talk · contribs · candidate page · assign permissions) 270 239 107 71.62% Elected
FOARP (talk · contribs · candidate page · assign permissions) 268 242 106 71.66% Elected
MarcGarver (talk · contribs · candidate page) 266 230 120 68.91% Not elected
Pbritti (talk · contribs · candidate page) 254 239 123 67.37% Not elected
The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk · contribs · candidate page) 264 207 145 64.55% Not elected
Valenciano (talk · contribs · candidate page) 221 293 102 68.42% Not elected
LindsayH (talk · contribs · candidate page) 240 255 121 66.48% Not elected
AntiDionysius (talk · contribs · candidate page) 248 233 135 64.75% Not elected
Mdewman6 (talk · contribs · candidate page) 195 290 131 59.82% Not elected
Robert McClenon (talk · contribs · candidate page) 259 151 206 55.70% Not elected
Starship.paint (talk · contribs · candidate page) 219 213 184 54.34% Not elected
Sable232 (talk · contribs · candidate page) 175 298 143 55.03% Not elected
Bastun (talk · contribs · candidate page) 186 253 177 51.24% Not elected
Velella (talk · contribs · candidate page) 157 297 162 49.22% Not elected
SWinxy (talk · contribs · candidate page) 168 271 177 48.70% Not elected
Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs · candidate page) 199 165 252 44.12% Not elected
Spy-cicle (talk · contribs · candidate page) 131 283 202 39.34% Not elected
Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk · contribs · candidate page) 154 236 226 40.53% Not elected
EggRoll97 (talk · contribs · candidate page) 146 250 220 39.89% Not elected
Frost (talk · contribs · candidate page) 102 246 268 27.57% Not elected
Leonidlednev (talk · contribs · candidate page) 89 262 265 25.14% Not elected
Knightoftheswords281 (talk · contribs · candidate page) 59 249 308 16.08% Not elected
Zippybonzo (talk · contribs · candidate page) 75 194 347 17.77% Not elected

Scrutineer ratification

  1. EPIC (talk) 19:23, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
  2. —Yahya (talk • contribs.) 19:25, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
  3. --Johannnes89 (talk) 22:50, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Rationale

The number of requests for adminship (RFA) has declined from a peak of 920 in 2007 to just 36 in 2016, and has since averaged around 23 per year. This suggests problems with the RFA process, which might be mitigated with a different process, such as administrator elections. Ways that administrator elections might help include:

Reasoning for holding the trial

The result of the request for comment discussion regarding running a trial election was The community supports trying this proposal for 1 election, after which it will be reviewed in Phase II. While there are concerns regarding the implementation details of this proposal, given this is a trial run, there is sufficient support to run the election as written.

Accordingly, the trial election was held, with implementation details (such as scrutineering) worked out based on discussions on the Admin Election talk page.

After the trial, further request for comment discussions were held to discuss how to proceed, thus allowing the community to alter the process if desired, or choose not to continue.

Comparison with requests for adminship

The trial election differed from WP:RFA in several ways. Some of these aspects were unique to the trial, and were later revised at RFC.

Comparison between processes
Requests for adminship Trial administrator election
Discussion period 7 days (overlapping) 3 days
Voting period 7 days
Ballot Open Secret (using SecurePoll)
Success criterion Consensus Supermajority
Success threshold 65–75% 70%
Suffrage Extended confirmed account See § Voter eligibility
When it can happen Any time October 2024

Newsletter

If you'd like to receive a user talk message about administrator election milestones, please add yourself to the mailing list.

Post-election RFCs

After the October 2024 trial election, a series of RFCs were workshopped and then opened for comment to gather community opinions on how the process should be fine-tuned in the future, if administrator elections are to happen again. The results from these RFCs were used as the basis for a proposal for running more admin elections. From the RFCs, the following conclusions were drawn:

Further details can be found on the RFC page.

See also

References

  1. ↑ As RfA is a consensus-based process, there is no exact threshold for success, but in practice a candidate with below 65% support is almost always unsuccessful, and above 75% almost always successful. Candidates with between 65 and 75% support are typically subject to a bureaucrat discussion about the consensus for their request, and outcomes vary on a case-to-case basis.