Wikipedia:AI noticeboard/CJNJSOne
.svg){kind=icon}
CJNJSOne
21 October 2026
.svg){kind=icon}
.svg){kind=icon}
Discussion: CJNJSOne
CJNJSOne (talk · contribs · block log · filter log · page creations · central auth · count)
21 October 2026
See User_talk:CJNJSOne#Explain_AI_usage (courtesy ping @Worldbruce). Special:Diff/1354115475 (May 2026) is blatant, Gnoming tagged articles from mid-2025 when they started editing, making tracker and doing llmprods Kowal2701 (talk, contribs) 14:54, 21 October 2026 (UTC)
- Hello i just want to clarify about my use of AI. When i first started editing, i use ai for help with some of my edits particularly woording & grammar. I was still learning and I understand the concerns around that.I haven't used AI for many of my last articles and edits. I've written those myself based on the sources and checked the material before adding. I'm not trying to deny or hide the fact that i used AI earlier. but I don't think it would be accurate to assume that my other work is AI generated based on my earlier edits. Thanks.CJNJSOne (talk) CJNJSOne (talk) 18:45, 22 October 2026 (UTC)
- @Kowal2701 Hello, please give me some time to go through articles. I did use AI assistance on some of my earlier articles, and I’m willing to review those articles one by one and fix issues.Honestly didn’t realize that using AI could cause this kind of problem on Wikipedia. If I had understood the implications, I wouldn’t have used it. But there are also articles where I did not use LLM. Pls allow me to restore those contributions after checking them properly.
- About Special:Diff/1354115475, I didn't use LLM for that edit. I was using a news article that had a lot of information in it, and my mistake was that I didn't add the citation properly after all the information I took from that source.
- Worldbruce, pointed this out and after that I fixed the citations and also replied to them about it User_talk:CJNJSOne#c-CJNJSOne-20260906140700-Worldbruce-20260720221500. Yes, there was a citation issue with that edit, but it wasn't written using LLM.CJNJSOne (talk) 05:52, 24 October 2026 (UTC)
- @CJNJSOne, apologies for the late reply, if you want I can draftify some of the PROD'd articles for you to work on? Just a heads up though, LLM-generated content is really difficult and time-consuming to clean up while attempting to preserve it, we usually recommend that people stubbify or just rewrite LLM-generated articles. Please let me know which ones you want draftified, thanks Kowal2701 (talk, contribs) 16:51, 25 October 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you so much @Kowal2701, I really appreciate it. As far I remember, these are the articles where I used LLM;-
- Anti Terrorism Unit (Bangladesh)
- MRT Police
- Bangladesh–Slovenia relations
- Bangladesh–Malta relations
- Bangladesh–Uzbekistan relations
- Bangladesh–Romania relations
- Bangladesh–Finland relations
- Bangladesh–Georgia relations
- Bangladesh–Estonia relations
- Valo Kajer Hotel
- Manzare Hassin Murad.
- Please draftify these for me. I will go through one by one. the sources, and rewrite them properly where needed. but unfortunately I saw that the cleanup list also includes other articles where I did not use LLM. In many articles, I only made small edits rather than writing or substantially expanding the article. I hope those can be considered separately rather than treating all of them as LLM. agin thank you. CJNJSOne (talk) 18:17, 25 October 2026 (UTC)
- I've draftified the following, please submit them to WP:AFC and remove the {{AI-generated}} tag when done (you can see a list of your drafts at this link):
- The other articles listed above weren't LLMPROD'd and can be worked on in mainspace. Most of the small edits (i.e. less than 500 bytes) below will probably be marked with "Unnecessary"; are there any large edits listed below that you wrote yourself? Kowal2701 (talk, contribs) 20:00, 25 October 2026 (UTC)
- Yes, there are several larger edits on the list that I wrote myself without using LLM;-
- I didn't use LLM for any of these, I only added references or made other edits to the existing content.
- My last large edit was on Sabbir Nasir. I added the information myself with the cited sources. As I mentioned, I made some mistakes with citations at first and didn't place them properly after some of the information. When this was pointed out to me, I fixed the citations, when it was seen.
- I can go through the articles again and check the edits and sources carefully, if you want. I'll change the problems, if I find anything.
- Thank you for draftifying the other articles and giving me the chance to work on them.CJNJSOne (talk) 06:53, 26 October 2026 (UTC)
- Hi @Kowal2701, I just noticed that several articles have already been deleted as expired LLM PRODS. I was actually discussing this with you and trying to sort things out so I wasn't expecting them to be deleted in the meantime. Would be possible to restore the articles where I didn't use LLM? It is really unfortunate to see those deleted as LLm when I wrote them without using LLM. please let me know what I can do about these articles now.I would really appreciate your help. thank you. CJNJSOne (talk) 16:53, 26 October 2026 (UTC)
- you can request that they be undeleted at WP:REFUND, but I'd suggest working on the drafts first to regain trust (there's no rush, articles can be undeleted at any time), up to you though Kowal2701 (talk, contribs) 18:21, 26 October 2026 (UTC)
- I see that LLMPROD notice gives five days. Since I was already discussing the issue with you, I thought i should wait until we reached a clear way forward and then start working on the articles. I didn't expect some of them to be deleted while we were still discussing it. I've tried to be completely open about this. I haven't hidden anything and told you which articles used LLM and which ones I wrote without llm. WP:REFUND, I never used it before so Im not really familiar with the process. If I request undeletion will the articles normally be restored, or will I need to provide an explanation first? Please let me know what I should mention in the request especially for the articles where I didn't use LLM.CJNJSOne (talk) 19:00, 26 October 2026 (UTC)
- I will start improving on the drafted articles one by one and submit them through AfC when they are ready.also wanted to ask about Sabbir Nasir. as I mentioned earlier I did not use Llm for that edit & I had already corrected the citation issues after Worldbruce pointed them out. Would you be able to restore the information that was removed from that article? CJNJSOne (talk) 19:53, 26 October 2026 (UTC)
- Are you sure you didn't use LLMs on Sabbir Nasir? A lot of it reads like AI (at the very least, it reads pretty promotional), and Pangram says it may be AI Kowal2701 (talk, contribs) 19:59, 26 October 2026 (UTC)
- Yes Im sure I did not use LLM. Those lines were from an earlier edit, and I had already removed them in my last edit. CJNJSOne (talk) 20:20, 26 October 2026 (UTC)
- They were from Special:Diff/1342070218. In Special:Diff/1352320150 you wrote 8k bytes in 23 minutes, which seems implausible? Kowal2701 (talk, contribs) 20:27, 26 October 2026 (UTC)
- Yes, Im sure. normally im write in Word file or Notepad first. I go through the sources write the information and keep the reference links below it. Then I add the info to Wikipedia and place the references end of the relevant information. So I didn't write those 8k bytes within those 23 mints.CJNJSOne (talk) CJNJSOne (talk) 20:51, 26 October 2026 (UTC)
- Hi @Kowal2701 just following up on my reply above when you have a chance. Please let me know your thoughts. Thanks.CJNJSOne (talk) 18:37, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
- They were from Special:Diff/1342070218. In Special:Diff/1352320150 you wrote 8k bytes in 23 minutes, which seems implausible? Kowal2701 (talk, contribs) 20:27, 26 October 2026 (UTC)
- Yes Im sure I did not use LLM. Those lines were from an earlier edit, and I had already removed them in my last edit. CJNJSOne (talk) 20:20, 26 October 2026 (UTC)
- Are you sure you didn't use LLMs on Sabbir Nasir? A lot of it reads like AI (at the very least, it reads pretty promotional), and Pangram says it may be AI Kowal2701 (talk, contribs) 19:59, 26 October 2026 (UTC)
- you can request that they be undeleted at WP:REFUND, but I'd suggest working on the drafts first to regain trust (there's no rush, articles can be undeleted at any time), up to you though Kowal2701 (talk, contribs) 18:21, 26 October 2026 (UTC)
- @CJNJSOne, apologies for the late reply, if you want I can draftify some of the PROD'd articles for you to work on? Just a heads up though, LLM-generated content is really difficult and time-consuming to clean up while attempting to preserve it, we usually recommend that people stubbify or just rewrite LLM-generated articles. Please let me know which ones you want draftified, thanks Kowal2701 (talk, contribs) 16:51, 25 October 2026 (UTC)
Cleanup
Tracker detail
- User: CJNJSOne (talk · contribs · block log · filter log · page creations · central auth · count)
- Start date: 2022-12-01
- End date: 2026-10-21
Tracking list
 | Notes
|
Each individual row below tracks an article's status using a template with three parameters: {{AIC article row|a page title, |a status, |and optional notes }}
Available statuses are: 
to do/requested, 
ongoing, 
tagged, 
unnecessary, and 
completed.
Please update and add entries as needed.