LifeLearning
4 October 2026
LifeLearning (talk · contribs · block log · filter log · page creations · central auth · count)
I suspect that this editor has made use of LLM in violation of WP:NOLLM. I am particularly bothered by Gershon HaCohen, which in its earliest version contains WP:AIBOLD and WP:AILIST, and also cites a Wikipedia article and contains a reference that does not go anywhere. Likewise, Glenn Cohen (psychologist) in its earliest version displays WP:AIBOLD, WP:AILIST and WP:AITITLECASE. I wonder if other editors more experienced in LLM detection may be able to find further evidence. Dionysodorus (talk | contribs) 22:41, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
...marking Israel’s first FTA in Asia and Korea’s first FTA in the Middle East.), but there are also grammatical errors etc. Their next potentially-AI edit was 2 Nov 2025 (Special:Diff/1320103949), same time as the first creation, so I'd probably start the tracker from there (btw it's interesting they've extensively edited Lightricks, created by someone blocked for UPE) Kowal2701 (talk, contribs) 23:27, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
The editor has been active within the last month, so consensus is needed for PRV. Based on the above, I wonder if we could find consensus for PRV from 2 November 2025 onwards? Dionysodorus (talk | contribs) 23:41, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
Has someone given a clear warning? I've made a tracker. There's a "removed COI tag" among those pages somewhere, too, and a lot of other tags one doesn't like to see. M kuhner (talk) 01:56, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Hi everyone, and thanks Dionysodorus for the notice about this discussion. I've been active on-and-off over the years, and am happy to make the conversation more simple: (1) There were a number of LLM-assisted edits I made, until someone pointed me to the no-AI policy (which I previously wasn't aware of), that has obviously stopped. (2) Nonetheless, happy to help with any review of any pages that you think still suffer from AI-related issues, even though I did my best to clean them up already. LifeLearning (talk) 11:17, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
If we accept the above, that implies that we ought to make the tracker start on 7 June (when Jerusalem Print Workshop was created) and end maybe on 12 July (after which there are no further edits to the problematic articles)? If nobody objects in the next day or so, I'll redo the tracker accordingly and start going through it. Dionysodorus (talk | contribs) 21:05, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
I've just prodded or tagged the creations from June/July, as well as LTX and Pax Silica which both come up as AI-generated on Pangram per the above. In terms of creations, that only leaves Zvika Klein, which Kowal and Gnomingstuff think does not look AI-generated if I understand the above correctly. Since I suppose it would be inappropriate to prod an article against the view of the noticeboard discussion, I've marked that as unnecessary, although personally my inclination would be to prod that as well on the basis that we don't really know and the removal is supposed to be presumptive. Dionysodorus (talk | contribs) 15:20, 9 October 2026 (UTC)
Relevant report and discussion may be viewable on the talk page.
 | Notes
|
Each individual row below tracks an article's status using a template with three parameters: {{AIC article row|a page title, |a status, |and optional notes }}
Available statuses are: 
to do/requested, 
ongoing, 
tagged, 
unnecessary, and 
completed.
Please update and add entries as needed.
