Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SQL PL

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. – bradv^🍁 16:59, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SQL PL (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It exists, but doesn't have the coverage or significance to meet WP:N. Boleyn (talk) 12:05, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:28, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. There have been several books published on this topic. At worst it could be merged to Db2 Database. --Michig (talk) 15:20, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to Db2 DatabaseGorgonaJS (talk) 14:26, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, per the significant coverage in reliable secondary sources.

SailingInABathTub (talk) 14:06, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge - it’s a DB2 database subtopic, and the content is small enough to fold in. I see some hits in GBooks, mostly as part of that, e.g. phrasing DB2 SQL PL. The general GHITS and GNews seems too small to support a separate article. Cheers Markbassett (talk) 18:16, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep It is still active development. Version 11.5 is a latest. scope_creep^Talk 15:42, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.