Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/FastilyBot 7

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was  Approved.

FastilyBot 7

Operator: Fastily (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)

Time filed: 00:39, Friday, April 1, 2016 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Automatic

Programming language(s): Java

Source code available: When I have written it

Function overview: Finds local files which have been transferred to Commons which are now nominated for deletion at Commons and replaces {{Now Commons}} with {{Nominated for deletion on Commons}}.

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): n/a

Edit period(s): Daily

Estimated number of pages affected: < 50 per day

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): No

Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): Yes

Function details: As described above -FASTILY 00:39, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

See also: Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/FastilyBot 8 -FASTILY 00:42, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Discussion

Approved for trial (100 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. — xaosflux Talk 10:53, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

@Xaosflux: The bot ran against the entire set of files tagged with {{Now Commons}} (~1000 entries) and only found 17 instances of files which have been nominated for deletion on Commons. While this is an important task, at this point, I can't imagine that the bot will find more than 1-2 affected files per run. So my question is, should I continue to run the bot every day until 100 edits are made, or are the edits made thus far sufficient as a trial for approval? -FASTILY 06:01, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
  • The run looks fine this can be approved. — xaosflux Talk 12:05, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Approved. — xaosflux Talk 12:05, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.