Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/FastilyBot 8

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was  Approved.

FastilyBot 8

Operator: Fastily (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)

Time filed: 00:42, Friday, April 1, 2016 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Automatic

Programming language(s): Java

Source code available: Once I have written it

Function overview: Finds files flagged with {{Nominated for deletion on Commons}} that have been deleted on Commons and applies {{Deleted on Commons}} accordingly.

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): n/a

Edit period(s): Bi-weekly

Estimated number of pages affected: 5-10 per run

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): No

Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): Yes

Function details: As described above. -FASTILY 00:42, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

See also: Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/FastilyBot 7 -FASTILY 00:42, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Discussion

Approved for trial (100 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. — xaosflux Talk 10:54, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

  • FastilyClone is not a bot, but rather an alternate account of mine; the edit you're referencing was made manually, and is therefore wholly irrelevant to this BRFA. However, since you asked, I removed {{NotMovedToCommons}} because it is redundant. Note that the file in question was transferred, but ultimately deleted off Commons. -FASTILY 08:15, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

@Fastily: what is the status of this one? -- Magioladitis (talk) 07:46, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

{{OperatorAssistanceNeeded|D}} . — xaosflux Talk 09:41, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Haven't done the test run, but I'm writing the code right now. Should be ready soon -FASTILY 04:58, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
@Xaosflux: The bot found 47 instances of local files transferred to Commons and then deleted on Commons. Everything worked as expected. Could the task be approved now, or do I have to wait until 100 edits are made? -FASTILY 08:15, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Approved. - All of the trials look in order, the trial count was for a "maximum" only. — xaosflux Talk 14:45, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.