It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article or a Wikipedia policy, as it has not been reviewed by the community.
True vandals and trolls (as distinguished from users who dabble in minor vandalism) seek recognition and infamy by interrupting and frustrating the Wikipedia project and community. This is particularly true for those prolific vandals who have been immortalised on Wikipedia pages, meticulously catalogued by category pages, targeted by dedicated templates, or otherwise tangibly resisted. They thereby become a noted part of wiki culture. Such users usually suffer from chronic alienation and real or perceived powerlessness, and experience exceptional attention as empowerment, reward, and encouragement.
Encouragement
This glorification of vandalism through infamy encourages Internet memes through reinforcement, where users imitate notorious or unique vandalism methods for amusement, to share in the infamy, or for the thrill of defying authority and/or interfering in other users' work. Denying recognition and infamy neutralizes common primary motivators for vandalism and disruption.
Media exposure of vandalism on Wikipedia seems to invite increased vandalism. When a person writes in a newspaper or says on television that it is easy to insert nonsense in Wikipedia, invariably a number of imitators want to see it for themselves and believe they are "hackers". Making this issue seem more important than it is reinforces this behavior (see positive feedback).
Continuing to deal with vandalism
Some material is still going to be valuable in dealing with vandalism, so this is not about pretending vandalism does not exist. Instead, information on vandalism should be critically appraised: first, whether it has genuine value; then, whether that value outweighs any detriment from the publicity of that vandal or their vandalism. Stating that a certain individual is involved in very obvious vandalism probably does not enable any better recognition or response to that vandalism—it merely adds to the legend of a specific vandal. On the other hand, documenting a new form of vandalism in a neutral manner like Wikipedia:Vandalism §Types of vandalism ensures a suitable awareness of that vandalism's existence.
How to mitigate vandalism
If you see information pages about vandals or vandalism that you think have no practical purpose,
If the page is pure vandalism, tag it with {{Db-g3}} (delete because criterion G3);
If the page was created by a banned or blocked user after the ban or block, tag it with {{Db-g5}};
If the page is an obvious personal attack, replace all content with {{Db-g10}};
Otherwise, quietly revert or blank. Reserve listing the page as miscellany for deletion for serious matters, noting that a high-profile forum discussion of vandalism is the opposite of "deny recognition".
User pages of indefinitely blocked users (except sockpuppets and banned users) that have no practical purpose can be nominated for deletion as such after a short while. Remember that this is not a criterion for speedy deletion, unless the page is pure vandalism or a personal attack. In general, "socktags" on blocked sockpuppets' user pages should only be added, removed, or modified by administrators or sockpuppet investigations clerks.
↑In one case a vandal asked in an unblock request that a long term abuse page be created for them – that same user had previously taken screenshots of their own sockpuppets' vandalism and added them to other long term abuse pages.
↑This statement is intended as humour, and is neither empirical nor medical.
↑IP addresses stored for registered users are only kept in the system for so long.
