Wikipedia:Imminent death of Wikipedia predicted
 | This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
 | This is a humorous essay. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors and is made to be humorous. This page is not one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. This essay isn't meant to be taken seriously. |
...film at 11.
It's often said that Wikipedia is dying. This is the latest in a long line of technological deaths. Earlier, the WikiWikiWeb died. Before that, Usenet died.
Reasons why Wikipedia is dying include and may not be limited to:
- most of the major editors are leaving
- most edits are now made by robots
- article syntax is too complicated for readers and new editors
- pop culture articles are longer than science or history articles
- power-hungry administrators are warring against content creators so they can delete everything and rule a perfect, empty wiki [Is this right? -- Ed.]
- the people with the most time to edit are also those with the most time and inclination to argue in perpetuity
- the Great Space Wombat said it is dying
- bias is going to destroy the entire neutral point of view we uphold so much
- vandalism. No elaboration required
- the WMF is more corrupt than governments
- discussion here is more toxic than on Twitter
- nobody is donating (why else do they keep asking for money?)
- people will stop visiting the main site and just get blurbs from search engines or chatbots instead
- Wikipedia has been dying since at least 100 years ago.
- there is going to be a PR disaster at Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a reliable source
- there is a greater risk of an article about
- loss of traffic as users flock to Uncyclopedia
- governments were tired of it and decided to wipe it out once and for all
- Insert additional reasons here