Wikipedia:Respectively

This is the article on "respective(ly)" from Fowler's Modern English Usage (1926), lightly reworded and reformatted.

Use of respective(ly)

respective(ly). Delight in these words is a wide-spread but depraved taste; like soldiers and policemen, they have work to do, but, when the work is not there, the less we see of them the better; of ten sentences in which they occur, nine would be improved by their removal. The evil is considerable enough to justify an examination at some length; examples may be sorted into six groups:

  1. in which the words give information needed by sensible readers;
  2. in which they give information that may be needed by fools;
  3. in which they say again what is said elsewhere;
  4. in which they say nothing intelligible;
  5. in which they are used wrongly for some other word; and
  6. in which they give a positively wrong sense.

A. Right uses

Without respectively, the reader might suppose that both composers were rated higher on some points and lower in others; respectively shows that higher goes with Strauss, and lower with Debussy.

Without respectively, the reader might think that both colleges are for both sexes; respectively shows that one is for men and the other is for women.

Respectively shows that the contradiction is not, for instance, between earlier and later news from the combined two, but between news from Sofia and news from Constantinople.

B. Foolproof uses

The particular fool, for whose benefit each respectively is inserted, follows the sentence:

the reader who does not know which gentleman normally speaks in which Parliament, or who may imagine both gentlemen talking in both Parliaments.
the reader who may expect a group to define another group's attitude.
the reader who may think that Republicans and Democrats combined hold several conventions.
the reader who thinks that the prediction contains one shared fate for the two Bills.

C. Tautological uses

After each is underlined the expression or the fact that makes respective superfluous.

D. Unintelligible uses

E. In place of other words

The writers of these mean no more than both.

Both is to be placed after Fellow of above.

F. Reversal of sense

This can only mean that Englishmen know too little of England, and Americans know too little of America—which is no doubt true, but is not the truth that the writer wished to convey; 'about each other's countries' would have served both writer and reader.

The simple fact is that respective(ly) are words seldom needed, but pretentious writers drag them in at every opportunity for the air of thoroughness and precision they are supposed to give to a sentence.

See also

References

  1. ↑ H.W. Fowler (1926). Modern English Usage. p. 500.