Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests

Welcome to Requested moves/Technical requests

If you are unable to complete a move for technical reasons, you can request a technical move below. This is the correct method if you tried to move a page, but you got an error message saying something like "You do not have permission to move this page, for the following reasons:..." or "This page could not be moved, for the following reason:..."


If you are here because you want an experienced editor to approve of your new article or proposed rename, you are in the wrong place.

To list a technical request: edit the Uncontroversial technical requests subsection or click the big blue button and insert the following code at the bottom of the list, filling in pages and reason:

{{subst:RMassist|current page title|new title|reason=edit summary for the move}}

This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Do not edit the article's talk page, just click the button below.

To request a reversion of a recent undiscussed move: Review the guidelines at WP:RMUM of whether a reversion of an undiscussed move qualifies as uncontroversial and if so, edit the Requests to revert undiscussed moves subsection or click the big blue button and insert the following code at the bottom of the list, filling in pages and reason:

{{subst:RMassist|current page title|new title|reason=edit summary for the move}}

Note that in some cases, clerks, such as administrators or page movers may determine that your request for a reversion does not pass the criteria and may move the request to the contested section or open a formal requested move discussion for potentially controversial moves on your behalf.

  • If you object to a proposal listed in the uncontroversial technical requests section, please move the request to the Contested technical requests section, append a note on the request elaborating on why, and sign with ~~~~. Consider pinging the requester to let them know about the objection.
  • If your technical request is contested, or if a contested request is left untouched without reply, create a requested move on the article talk and remove the request from the section here. The fastest and easiest way is to click the "discuss" button at the request, save the talk page, and remove the entry on this page. A bot will automatically remove contested requests after 72 hours of inactivity.
Administration needed

If your request requires an administrator. Usually, do so if the page has been fully protected or move protected (see this guide to which moves need administrators).

Technical requests

Uncontroversial technical requests

This request is necessary, but there is an issue with singular vs. plural. Authoritative historical sources, depending on author, use both "riot" and "riots" and this article does the same. It appears to me that it was one continuous riot that lasted for multiple days, in which case the new article title should be the singular "Hibiya Riot," but let's see if anyone more knowledgeable about this episode can chime in. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 12:55, 25 October 2026 (UTC)
Noting that the lead was changed two days ago to include the proposed title. CNCin solidarity (talk) 10:57, 26 October 2026 (UTC)
  • Vietic2@ you improperly moved the disambiguation by cutting and pasting the content and then changed it to a redirect. Please don't do that. Pages with an edit history need to be moved to avoid making a hash of the attribution in the history. older ≠ wiser 10:34, 27 October 2026 (UTC)

Requests to revert undiscussed moves

Contested technical requests

Large sections on notable topics may be split to a standalone article. See WP:SPLIT. Creating a new stub article which contains far less reliably-sourced information than what is already on Wikipedia is not particularlly useful. 162 etc. (talk) 16:26, 23 October 2026 (UTC)
@Robloxguest3 Per above, you could try to propose a split of the history section at the talk page instead of creating a new draft. Does that sound like a good alternative? Thanks! —1isall (talk | contribs) 14:45, 24 October 2026 (UTC)
sounds great! Robloxguest3 (talk) 05:00, 25 October 2026 (UTC)
@Paperswanflourishing We do not use ALL CAPS in titles (unless it's an acronym or something). Thanks! —1isall (talk | contribs) 00:48, 23 October 2026 (UTC)
Thanks for the note. STACKTV is the brand’s official styling, like STX Entertainment or IKEA Paperswanflourishing (talk) 04:14, 24 October 2026 (UTC)
Then we can just leave the note about that. Thanks! —1isall (talk | contribs) 00:44, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
@IsaacMDB23 No improvement since the last AfC decline. So basically, you should finish this process at AfC, improve THE DRAFT and resubmit it there. Thanks. CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 18:39, 25 October 2026 (UTC)
What is there to improve? It says it's because it's "a copy of the article" but it would replace the section in said article, like Le Sserafim and Le Sserafim discography.
Not arguing just genuinely want to know, thanks! IsaacMDB23 (talk) 19:07, 25 October 2026 (UTC)

Administrator needed