Soil scientists have raised concerns about how to preserve soil and arable land in a world with a growing population, possible future water crisis, increasing per-capita food consumption, and land degradation.
Fields of study
Soil occupies the pedosphere, one of Earth's spheres that the geosciences use to organize the Earth conceptually. This is the conceptual perspective of pedology and edaphology, the two main historical branches of soil science. Pedology is the study of soil in its natural setting. Edaphology is the study of soil in relation to soil-dependent uses. Both branches apply a combination of soil physics, soil chemistry, and soil biology. Due to the numerous interactions between the biosphere, atmosphere and hydrosphere that are hosted within the pedosphere, more integrated, less soil-centric concepts are also valuable. Many concepts essential to understanding soil come from or have been renewed by individuals not identifiable strictly as soil scientists, like biologists or philosophers. This highlights the interdisciplinary nature of soil concepts.
Research
Exploring the diversity and dynamics of soil continues to bring new discoveries and insights. New areas of soil research are driven by the need to understand soil in the context of climate change, greenhouse gases, and carbon sequestration. Interest in maintaining biodiversity and in exploring past cultures has also created renewed interest in achieving a better understanding of soil.
Soil mapping is the process of classifying soil types and properties in a given area and geo-encoding the information. Along the second half of the 20th century soil mapping was currently achieved by field survey and reporting contours of soil types on geographic maps at varying scales according to countries and purposes. More recently digital soil mapping approaches have been developed in various countries for quantifying soils in space and time using remote sensing data.
In 1998, the World Reference Base for Soil Resources (WRB) replaced the FAO soil classification as the international soil classification system. The currently valid version of WRB is the 4th edition, 2022. The FAO soil classification, in turn, borrowed from modern soil classification concepts, including USDA soil taxonomy.
WRB is based mainly on soil morphology as an expression of pedogenesis. A major difference with USDA soil taxonomy is that soil climate is not part of the system, except insofar as climate influences soil profile characteristics.
Many other classification schemes exist, including vernacular systems. The structure in vernacular systems is either nominal (giving unique names to soils or landscapes) or descriptive (naming soils by their characteristics such as red, hot, fat, or sandy). Soils are distinguished by obvious characteristics, such as physical appearance (e.g., color, texture, landscape position), performance (e.g., production capability, flooding), and accompanying vegetation. A vernacular distinction familiar to many is classifying texture as heavy (clayish) or light (sandy). Light soils with higher sand content and better structure take less effort to turn and cultivate than finer-textured soils but are more susceptible to erosion and thus to losses of production capacity. Light (sandy) soils do not necessarily weigh less than heavy (clay) soils on an air dry basis (i.e. they have similar bulk density), nor do they have more porosity, but they are less sensitive to cattletrampling because they are more resistant to compaction.
History
The earliest known soil classification system comes from China, appearing in the book Yu Gong (5th century BCE), where the soil was divided into three categories and nine classes, depending on its color, texture and hydrology.
Contemporaries Friedrich Albert Fallou (the German founder of modern soil science) and Vasily Dokuchaev (the Russian founder of modern soil science) are both credited with being among the first to identify soil as a resource whose distinctness and complexity deserved to be separated conceptually from geology and crop production and treated as a whole. As a founding father of soil science, Fallou has primacy in time, working on the origins of soil before Dokuchaev was born. However, Dokuchaev's work was more extensive and is considered to be more significant to modern soil theory than Fallou's.
Previously, soil had been considered a product of chemical transformations of rocks, a dead substrate from which plants derive nutritious elements. Soil and bedrock were in fact equated. Dokuchaev considers the soil as a natural body having its own genesis and its own history of development, a body with complex and multiform processes taking place within it. The soil is considered as different from bedrock. The latter becomes soil under the influence of a series of soil-forming factors (climate, vegetation, country, relief and age). According to him, soil should be called the "daily" or outward horizon of rocks regardless of the type. Soils are changed naturally by the common effect of water, air and various kinds of living and dead organisms.
A 1914 encyclopedic definition: "the different forms of earth on the surface of the rocks, formed by the breaking down or weathering of rocks". serves to illustrate the historic view of soil which persisted from the 19th century. Dokuchaev's late 19th century soil concept developed in the 20th century to one of soil as earthy material that has been altered by living processes. A corollary concept is that soil without a living component is simply a part of Earth's outer layer, a regolith.
Further refinement of the soil concept is occurring in view of an appreciation of energy transport and transformation within soil. The term is popularly applied to the material on the surface of the Earth's moon and Mars, a usage acceptable within only a portion of the scientific community. Accurate to this modern understanding of soil is Nikiforoff's 1959 definition of soil as the "excited skin of the sub aerial part of the Earth's crust".
Areas of practice
Academically, soil scientists tend to be drawn to one of five areas of specialization: soil biology, pedology, edaphology, physics, or chemistry. Yet the work specifics are very much dictated by the challenges facing our civilization's desire to sustain the land that supports it, and the distinctions between the sub-disciplines of soil science often blur in the process, with The Critical Zone concept providing a natural framework for cross-disciplinary fundamental research on soil, rock, air, water, and biotic resources at the Earth's surface. Soil science professionals commonly stay current in soil chemistry, soil physics, soil biology, pedology, and applied soil science in related disciplines. However, the emergence and development of new sub-disciplines, more related to other fields of knowledge, such as biology and physics, than to the original geological framework, contributed to declining investments in research and teaching of soil science at the turn of the 21st century.
One point of effort drawing in soil scientists in the U.S. as of 2004[update] is the Illinois Soil Quality Initiative. Central to the Soil Quality Initiative is developing indices of soil health and then monitoring them in a way that provides long-term (decade-to-decade) feedback on the performance as stewards of the planet. The effort includes understanding the functions of soil microbiotic crusts and exploring the potential to sequester atmospheric carbon in soil organic matter. Relating the concept of agriculture to soil quality, however, has not been without criticism, including critiques by Nobel Peace Prize laureate Norman Borlaug, the father of the Green Revolution, and World Food Prize winner Pedro Sanchez, two proponents of biotechnology-based agriculture for solving the hungry problem in the tropics.
A more traditional role for soil scientists has been to map soils. Almost every area in the United States now has a published soil survey, including interpretive tables on how soil properties support or limit activities and uses. An internationally accepted soil taxonomy allows uniform communication of soil characteristics and soil functions. National and international soil survey efforts have given the profession unique insights into landscape-scale functions. The landscape functions that soil scientists are called upon to address in the field seem to fall roughly into six areas:
Depression storage capacity, in soil science, is the ability of a particular area of land to retain water in its pits and depressions, thus preventing it from flowing. Depression storage capacity, along with infiltration capacity, is one of the main factors involved in Horton overland flow, whereby water volume surpasses both infiltration and depression storage capacity and begins to flow horizontally across land, possibly leading to flooding and soil erosion. The study of land's depression storage capacity is important in the fields of geology, ecology, and especially hydrology.
↑Donagemma, Guilherme Kangussu; de Freitas, Pedro Luiz; Balieiro, Fabiano de Carvalho; Fontana, Ademir; Spera, Silvio Túlio; Lumbreras, José Francisco; Viana, João Herbert Moreira; de Araújo Filho, José Coelho; dos Santos, Flávia Cristina; de Albuquerque, Manoel Ricardo; Macedo, Manuel Cláudio Motta; Teixeira, Paulo Cesar; Amaral, André Julio; Bortolon, Elisandra; Bortolon, Leandro (September 2016). "Characterization, agricultural potential, and perspectives for the management of light soils in Brazil". Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira. 51 (9): 1003–20. doi:10.1590/S0100-204X2016000900001.
Soil Survey Staff (1993). Soil Survey: Early Concepts of Soil. (html) Soil Survey Manual USDA Handbook 18, Soil Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture. URL accessed on 2004-11-30.
