Wikipedia:Cleanup/Archive 7

 Main page Posts Archived posts Resources Templates Barnstars Members Talk page 
Archive 1←Archive 5Archive 6Archive 7Archive 8Archive 9Archive 10
Listings from 2012

2012

December

Added wikilinks through the letter 'J', then I had to take a break. Leschnei (talk) 01:30, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

November

Article removed. 4DHS (talk) 06:25, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
I removed the strike-out that was previously in place for this article above; the article exists (appears to have been recreated) and remains in need of work. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:31, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
Do you have any sources you could provide that would suggest this claim? 4DHS (talk) 06:49, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

October

Fixed: Looks to be cleaned up. Entries of events seem relevant and informative. Kobuu (talk) 15:38, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
Nearly 3x length of lead. Could still use some work, but much better than what it was. ComfyKem (talk) 18:26, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Fixed: Article is clean of tags. Still needs content. Kobuu (talk) 15:38, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
Fixed: Article is clean of tags. Kobuu (talk) 15:38, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
The article's sourcing has been improved, and it has been slightly expanded. Northamerica1000(talk) 23:58, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
— Northamerica1000(talk) 13:54, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
Almost completely rewritten. — Hex (❝?!❞) 10:30, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

September

— Above posted by Northamerica1000(talk) 20:18, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

August

July

 – I added a few sources to the article. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:47, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
 – The layout has been cleaned-up, and the article has been copy-edited to reduce promotional tone. Northamerica1000(talk) 20:44, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

June

 – cleaned up.--jcnJohn Chen (Talk-Contib.) RA 03:59, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
 – Cleaned up. Northamerica1000(talk) 19:52, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
 – Layout is cleaned up. Still needs work. Northamerica1000(talk) 14:22, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

May

 – Cleaned up the layout. The article still needs more sources. Northamerica1000(talk) 00:38, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
 – The article has been cleaned-up by other users and in some edits I have done. The article would still benefit from more sources. Northamerica1000(talk) 00:58, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
 – The article has been cleaned up. It would still benefit from copy editing and better organization. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:45, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

April

 – Was merged to Saga of the Skolian Empire. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:49, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
 – The article has been cleaned up. However it could still be reviewed and have more references.Moony22(talk) 20:39, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
 – Cleaned up. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:59, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
  • Have done some preliminary cleanup on the Roland Rat article. Fixed bare urls, added sections.Northamerica1000(talk) 21:41, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
 – The above 6 entries were posted by Northamerica1000(talk) 08:26, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
I like the idea of cleaning up this - if no one else is going to I'll take a look over the next few weeks (will take me a while to do it right)-- 🍺 Antiqueight confer 12:23, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
 – Cleaned up. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:45, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
 – The article has been cleaned up as of the time of this post. It would benefit from further copy editing. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:43, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
 – Cleaned up. A long article with 500 inline citations at this time. The article would still benefit from copy editing. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:35, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

March

 – Cleaned up. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:32, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
 – Cleaned up. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:10, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
 – Cleaned up. Needs more citations and copy editing. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:07, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
 – Cleaned up.
 – Cleaned up. Could still use more sources and copy editing. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:56, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
 – Cleaned up. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:59, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
—The above 12 posts are from Northamerica1000(talk) 10:17, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
 – I've done some preliminary clean-up to the page's layout and added the "expert attention requested" template. Northamerica1000(talk) 04:11, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

February

--- Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 11:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
Have you tried requesting protection at WP:RFPP? -- Ϫ 02:04, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

I have just put in a request for Temporary semi-protection. I should like to thank El duderino, and everyone else who has helped on The Sopranos since 25 February 2012 (UTC)--- Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 10:45, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection:
Persistent sockpuppetry. Repeated deletion of sourced material by new editors. Persistent vandalism. I have had help from the Wikipedia:Cleanup Project (since February 25) and I should welcome your help in maintaining this article. Thank you, Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 11:06, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Jayjg (talk) 03:36, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
 – Added a reference:
—"China National Tea Museum". China.org.cn. October 15, 2011. Retrieved February 17, 2012. {{cite web}}: External link in |publisher= (help) (Includes text and video). Northamerica1000(talk) 20:52, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
 – The link China National Tea Museum is functional as of the time of this post. Northamerica1000(talk) 10:40, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
  • Rail transport in Russia – Lede is short. Tagged for tone and neutrality issues. Information could be better-organized into sections and subsections.
  • Rail transport in Queensland – Lede is very short. Much content is in list format; conversion to prose may benefit the article. Additional inline citations are needed.
  • Bank of Hawaii – History section is very choppy, could use organization and consolidation into paragraphs. Most of the article is within its "History" section; better organization with new sections may be an improvement. Much of the content is missing inline citations.
 – Added lede to the article. Northamerica1000(talk) 18:45, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Quarantine technology – Unreferenced. Citations and clarification needed. Primarily in list format; conversion to prose may be an improvement. Article tagged as providing insufficient context.
  • Duane Hagadone – Lede is very short. List formatting could use conversion to prose.
  • Halton Hills Public Library – Some sections are very long without any inline citations, could use some reduction. Article has no inline citations. "Assets" section could use rewriting to clarify the content.
  • Hai Sing Catholic School – Prose is choppy, much of the article is in list format, which may be better as prose. The verifiability of the article is tagged as disputed. Unreferenced as of this post.
—Northamerica1000(talk) 0:55, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

*Jeanie Johnston - "Personal communication" as a reference. Would someone please look at (and probably revert) this edit of Jeanie Johnston I would explain that <ref>{{Personal communication, Aiseanna Mara Teoranta}}</ref> is not acceptable, (and it is tagged as such), but in the light of the reason given for the changes: (I reverted some of user Lugnad's changes, as he or she deleted withouth comment several unfavourable, but researched and sourced facts about the ship. Also fixed some typos.) It might be better received from someone other than I. Just to add, I have no idea what changes of mine are being referred to. Thanks, Lugnad (talk) 11:34, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for responding Lugnad (talk) 18:31, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
I've chopped the pers. comm. ref and claim. Bet it comes back. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:51, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
  • Football hooliganism – Could use some copy editing. Some sections need more references. Some of the references need better formatting. The article would benefit from some of the information being condensed. Northamerica1000(talk) 06:44, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Stormworld – The article has significant lists that could be changed to prose. Could use more references. Could use images. Northamerica1000(talk) 06:31, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Open University of Sudan - A user that seems to be related to this university added lots of content. First I've rollbacked it, than I've replaced and fixed it as a minor layout copyedit. All this content is related to this university and may be useful but I still have the doubt that it's wroten as a sort of Brochure. --Dэя-Бøяg 21:23, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
 – Information very likely copied and pasted, or written verbatim per University literature has been removed. The article is now a stub. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:00, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

January

 – The article appears to be cleaned up as of this post. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:44, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
 – The article appears to be cleaned up as of this post. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:40, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
 – Added a lede sentence. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:57, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
 – Added a lede sentence. Northamerica1000(talk) 16:03, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
Update: The article has been cleaned up. It would still benefit from copy editing. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:46, 28 June 2012 (UTC)