Wikipedia:Requests for page protection

Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.

Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection).

After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:ProtectedPages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to remove obvious vandalism.


Request addition of protection to a page, or increasing the current protection level

Request removal of protection from a page, or reducing the current protection level

Request a specific edit be made to a protected page

Request the non-urgent protection of multiple pages that do not require immediate administrator attention


Current requests for increase in protection level

Request addition of protection to a page, or increasing the current protection level
Request protection

Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

SC Toulon

Reason: Youtuber zealand is playing the game football manager and using this team. This seems to result in some viewers vandalizing the page adding him as manager etc.

Similar ting happened to the UD Melilla in the past Øln (talk) 21:15, 13 November 2026 (UTC)

  • Temporary Pending changes protection until zealand is done playing with this football club is likely sufficient Øln (talk) 21:24, 13 November 2026 (UTC)
    Question: About how long would that be? Daniel Case (talk) 04:35, 14 November 2026 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Favonian (talk) 00:04, 15 November 2026 (UTC)

The Prodigy

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Genre warring. ᴸᵃᶠᶠʸTaffer💬(they/she) In solidarity 16:04, 14 November 2026 (UTC)

North Macedonian passport

Reason: Edit-warring and disruptive editing organised by a set of related WP:SPA. Jingiby (talk) 17:48, 14 November 2026 (UTC)

Extended confirmed–protected for a period of one year, after which the page will revert to its previous protection level if it is still in effect, or become unprotected otherwise. under WP:CT/EE. The Bushranger One ping only 21:52, 14 November 2026 (UTC)

Aubrey Anderson-Emmons

Reason: Long-term target of vandalism. It returned. ~2026-60644-62 (talk) 18:23, 14 November 2026 (UTC)

Mukhriz Mahathir

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry.   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 18:49, 14 November 2026 (UTC)

Netflix Animation Studios

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content.   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 18:55, 14 November 2026 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

Request removal of protection from a page, or reducing the current protection level
Request unprotection

Garbage

Unprotection: Will be the Article for Improvement and on the main page in two days. The AfI should be unprotected so that potential new users can edit the page. InfernoHues (talk) 06:40, 14 November 2026 (UTC)

InfernoHues, this does not overrule protection policy. Did you contact the protecting admin? They are only semiactive, but may respond. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:17, 14 November 2026 (UTC)
@Courcelles pinging for reference. dualcerbtalk 15:26, 14 November 2026 (UTC)
The AfI RfC concluded that the articles selected should normally remain unprotected. Apologies for forgetting to contact Courcelles. InfernoHues (talk) 19:25, 14 November 2026 (UTC)
"Should" or "normally" does not equate to "must" or "mandatory". And "remain unprotected" implies the candidate was unprotected to begin with; it does not mean "unprotect an already-protected article." ~Anachronist (who / me) (talk) 22:39, 14 November 2026 (UTC)
@FaviFake @Dualcerb @Anachronist There is consensus to not protect the article. NewAccount7295 (talk) 22:48, 14 November 2026 (UTC)
Where? And how does that override the protection policy? I see no justification for opening up a known vandal magnet to all, creating an undue burden on the community to monitor and clean up. If Courcelles does not reply, I am inclined to decline this request. I advise finding another AFI candidate. ~Anachronist (who / me) (talk) 22:49, 14 November 2026 (UTC)
Fair enough, I'll propose a reroll of that article. (edit to add signature) InfernoHues (talk) 23:13, 14 November 2026 (UTC)

Kevlar

Unprotection: 12 years protected, deceased admin, did have some prior protections but I think this is okay for trial. dualcerbtalk 15:21, 14 November 2026 (UTC)

Question: In the instructions at the top of this page it states "DO NOT request a reduction in protection if...your reasoning for reducing protection is basically "a long time has passed" without supporting details". So could you expand as to why you believe the protection should be removed other than the duration of the protection? Ponyobons mots 19:45, 14 November 2026 (UTC)

Wolfdog

Unprotection: 14 years protected, no prior protections, deceased admin, trial unprotection should work. dualcerbtalk 15:21, 14 November 2026 (UTC)

Question: In the instructions at the top of this page it states "DO NOT request a reduction in protection if...your reasoning for reducing protection is basically "a long time has passed" without supporting details". So could you expand as to why you believe the protection should be removed other than the duration of the protection? Ponyobons mots 19:46, 14 November 2026 (UTC)

Matt Damon

Reason: Hello! Is there a valid reason for this page to be unprotected? Thank you Torshavnbabe (talk) 22:26, 14 November 2026 (UTC)

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. You have failed to read the instructions above. The talk page is not protected. ~Anachronist (who / me) (talk) 22:36, 14 November 2026 (UTC)

Current requests for edits to a protected page

Request a specific edit be made to a protected page
Request edit


List of highest-grossing Indian films

Please update the worldwide gross collection of Ramayana: Part One (2026) to ₹1033.55 crore.

Source: https://www.sacnilk.com/quicknews/ramayana_part_1_2026_Box_Office_Collection_Day_8

The source reports an India gross of ₹675.05 crore and an overseas gross of ₹358.50 crore, bringing the worldwide gross to ₹1033.55 crore. Chandreshkhare34 (talk) 18:36, 12 November 2026 (UTC)

Murder of Tupac Shakur

(Redacted) ~2026-60217-38 (talk) 21:24, 14 November 2026 (UTC)

Declined No specific request included. See WP:EDITXY for advice on formatting requests. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 21:42, 14 November 2026 (UTC)

Angels of Venice

An IP address consistently removes verifiable members of Angels of Venice . The members being removed are listed on recordings, youtube videos and playbills, searchable online. Perhaps this page needs to be locked? ~2026-60261-54 (talk) 21:41, 14 November 2026 (UTC)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. This is not an editing request. This sounds like a content dispute. Also please see WP:BLPPRIMARY. - The Bushranger One ping only 21:50, 14 November 2026 (UTC)

Sajal Aly

Link the article List of Zanjeerain characters in the Filmography section and the title Zanjeerain than the Role of Rabiya. Link Rabiya with List of Zanjeerain characters. Thanks Trubres (talk) 21:58, 14 November 2026 (UTC)

Handled requests

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.