Wikipedia:Requests for page protection

Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.

Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection).

After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:ProtectedPages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to remove obvious vandalism.


Request addition of protection to a page, or increasing the current protection level

Request removal of protection from a page, or reducing the current protection level

Request a specific edit be made to a protected page

Request the non-urgent protection of multiple pages that do not require immediate administrator attention


Current requests for increase in protection level

Request addition of protection to a page, or increasing the current protection level
Request protection

Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Starz Distribution

Reason: Similar WP:EW, stating that Starz Distribution no longer exists when it still exists since last year. This happened two times. Here and here. --~2026-47089-17 (talk) 21:55, 24 October 2026 (UTC)

Similar WP:EW stating that Starz Distribution and Starz Originals are different companies, while on the other hand, Starz Digital and Starz Worldwide are remaining different separate entities falling under the Starz Entertainment Group category here. --~2026-47089-17 (talk) 19:24, 25 October 2026 (UTC)

Clop (erotic fan art)

Indefnite pending-changes: Persistent vandalism from non-autoconfirmed sources – Given the subject matter, this article has long been a routine pit stop for drive-by juvenile trolling on a occasional basis, but not enough to warrant full-blown semi protection. Giovanni Potage (talk) 07:35, 25 October 2026 (UTC)

Air transports of heads of state and government

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Danners430 tweaks made 19:14, 25 October 2026 (UTC)

Digimon Adventure (1999 TV series)

Reason: Along with Digimon Adventure (2020 TV series), similar WP:EW and manually reverting necessary changes like "Based on" here and here. --~2026-47089-17 (talk) 20:06, 25 October 2026 (UTC)

Nebraska

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. In solidarity, Dafootballguy (Want to talk?) 22:15, 25 October 2026 (UTC)

It's Calebhughes, don't give the troll what they want, just do temp. dualcerbtalk 13:07, 26 October 2026 (UTC)

Talk:Sam Vaknin

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – TAs are spamming the talk page with large amounts of AI-generated edit requests (over 30 today). Day Creature (talk) 23:17, 25 October 2026 (UTC)

WYBC (AM)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Two TAs are claiming the station has been sold to an entity that has not actually done so. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:46, 25 October 2026 (UTC)

Ross Barkan

Reason: High level of temp account disruption (15 versions of the same 2 edits have been added (and reverted) in the last 9 days.) I don't know if this reaches the threshold for protection but clearly reverting isn't doing the trick. GreyZoneLife (talk) 01:26, 26 October 2026 (UTC)

Luis Reyes (businessman)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – persistent dump of AI by the same user (same IP over multiple temp accounts). Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 01:39, 26 October 2026 (UTC)

Chicken McNuggets

Indefinite Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. It's pretty obvious here that the unprotection trial has failed, and the page has now returned to being a schoolkid magnet. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 12:42, 26 October 2026 (UTC)

@El C:...any thoughts as unprotector? Lectonar (talk) 13:05, 26 October 2026 (UTC)
@Lectonar I don't think that obvious WP:TRYUNPROT fails need approval from the protecting admin. dualcerbtalk 13:06, 26 October 2026 (UTC)
Oh yeah I also +1 indefinite. dualcerbtalk 13:14, 26 October 2026 (UTC)
1) I think it's still worth getting their opinion in, for courtesy amongst other reasons (UNPROT mentions that the unprotection admin should monitor the page, and take appropriate action if needed. No action was taken yet, so perhaps EL C didn't find it appropriate to re-protect)...but we have this request here now. 2) I for one don't see a very obvious fail that jumps to the eye...the article has been unprotected almost a year, and disruptive edits were there, but not in eye-watering amounts. 3) I personally wouldn't go back to permanent semi-protection, but think pending-changes protection might do the trick. Lectonar (talk) 13:16, 26 October 2026 (UTC)
For what ever reason it was suppose to be semi-protected and gone away. We probably should do at least temporary semi-protection due to persistent vandalism. I do see some constructive edits on temporary accounts like @2025-37615-13. ~2026-56165-33 (talk) 13:49, 26 October 2026 (UTC)

Indra

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:CT/SA article subject to extensive sockpuppetry, cf. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Deva Sara999. Gotitbro (talk) 12:49, 26 October 2026 (UTC)

Anthony Gordon (footballer)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. dualcerbtalk 13:16, 26 October 2026 (UTC)

Vijayabahu I

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Consistant disruptive editing by IP. Blackknight12 (talk) 13:56, 26 October 2026 (UTC)

Rachel Millward

Reason: Higher level of protection needed. Unicted content is still being added to this biography of a living person. Helper201 (talk) 14:22, 26 October 2026 (UTC)

Kassapa VI

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing by IP. Blackknight12 (talk) 14:33, 26 October 2026 (UTC)

Steel Ball Run

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. dualcerbtalk 14:46, 26 October 2026 (UTC)

Nasir

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry.   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 15:13, 26 October 2026 (UTC)

Brad Bradford

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Possible sockpuppetry as well.   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 15:42, 26 October 2026 (UTC)

Al Bowlly

Reason: He's famous and i think he deserves his legacy to be locked so random people dont edit it to random stuff. ~2026-57076-37 (talk) 15:43, 26 October 2026 (UTC)

Eternal oblivion

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism/Edit Warring MathMan4 (talk) 15:53, 26 October 2026 (UTC)

The Bluey Movie

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. dualcerbtalk 16:05, 26 October 2026 (UTC)

Egyptian Armed Forces

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeatedly targeted by sockpuppets since 2025, with greater frequency in the last few weeks and months. See SPI here, including for the recent TAs. R Prazeres (talk) 16:12, 26 October 2026 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

Request removal of protection from a page, or reducing the current protection level
Request unprotection

Illuminati

Reason: Some knowledge just ~2026-57145-02 (talk) 12:18, 26 October 2026 (UTC)

Not unprotected – Meaningless request. Favonian (talk) 13:38, 26 October 2026 (UTC)

Current requests for edits to a protected page

Request a specific edit be made to a protected page
Request edit


Lewis Hamilton

Add Kim Kardashian as partner since 2026 ~2026-53419-34 (talk) 11:39, 26 October 2026 (UTC)

Declined The infobox is used for long-term partners. His relationship with Kim is already covered in the Relationships subsection. Lectonar (talk) 14:10, 26 October 2026 (UTC)

Kurds

MAJOR development. After several years of on and off attempts, I have finally solved the etymology of the ethnonym Kurd, which currently has no solution in academia. It comes from Proto-Indo-European *kr̥t-í- “cut” → Proto-Indo-Iranian *kr̥ti- → Proto-Iranian *kr̥ti- → *kur(ə)ti- (“cut”, but also an outer “garment”) → *Kurt(i)- (adopted as a tribal name) → *Kurt → *Kurd (by the 3rd c. CE) → Kurd (from a tribal identity to an ethnonym).

The first image, an etymological tree, sets out and justifies each sound change, if you want to see how the derivation is linguistically proven. It also contains the historical details on each form where attested. X reduces image resolution, so to read it clearly, expand the image and open it in a new tab. The second image shows the garment in question: the thick, tent-like traditional shepherd’s cloak made of dense felted wool, or wool mixed with goat hair.

Specifically, the name Kurd comes from this outer-garment sense, which was later adopted as a tribal name. Among Iranian languages, the garment word first appears in Avestan as kərəti-, in instructions on how Zoroastrians should wear it together with the sacred shirt and belt. In Parthian, kórt-ēn was the garment boys received as a coming-of-age gift when they reached manhood (which is linguistically a close match to the word Kurd, as the stem's predicted outcome of the Parthian would eventually become Kórd/Kurd since that gloss predates t > d). The word has cognates across the Iranian world, living and extinct, such as Khotanese, Ossetian, Sogdian and Bactrian.

There is historical evidence that Kurd still carried a secondary garment meaning in the early Islamic period, as the word was borrowed into Classical Arabic for a type of garment: kurdī, from the narrator Ibn Abī al-Zinād (d. 790 CE in Baghdad), in Abū Dāwūd 915 (before 889 CE), and kurdiyya in Ibn al-ʿArabī (d. 1148 CE), among others. The hadith reads: “…from ʿĀʾisha, with this report. He said: and he took a kurdī that belonged to Abū Jahm. It was said: O Messenger of God, the khamīṣa was better than the kurdī.” This is important because it shows the t > d form unlike Kurt-(ek), and other forms that passed through west Iranian languages later on via Sogdian. They are still from the same root however.

Tribal names and clans very often come from places, animals, objects and so on. The Kurdish tribe Sanjabi is named after the squirrel fur, Herki is named after a citadel, etc. Kurds are first attested in history specifically as a tribe by Eratosthenes, Strabo and others. The older reading of Kurd as “nomad” has no etymological basis in any Iranian language, and many Kurdologists/Iranologists today regard it as an anti-Kurdish narrative with no basis in the historical record (see Boris James). Some earlier academics unknowingly built on Arabic mistranslations and deliberate misreadings, which are now corrected. There were also at least 11 Iranian nomadic tribal organisations on the plateau before Islam with no Kurdish identification, and 5 Iranian tribal organisations on the plateau that never had a Kurdish tribal affiliation which completely contradicts this narrative.

The main sound-change question left open in my tree is how r̥ became ur, since it normally gives ar or ər. There are several resolutions, but it is not yet clear which one it is. The u-form *kur(ə)ti- may have spread by borrowing, as a garment from the East Iranian lands: ur is the usual outcome in Parachi, Sanglechi-Ishkashmi and Shughni (Clayton 2022), and Sogdian kurθ- probably passed into Persian kurta. Or it may be a regular change in some western dialect, as in Balochi kurt “did” < *kr̥ta- (Korn 2003).

Several scholars already tie the garment word to the root for “cut”. Abaev derives Ossetian kærc “fur coat” from Old Ossetian *karti-, which “corresponds perfectly” to Avestan kərəti- “garment” (that is, *kr̥ti-), perhaps from *(s)ker- “to cut”; he calls Ossetian kuræt a loan. Bailey derives Khotanese kīḍakyä “garment” from kart- “to cut, tailor”, comparing kərəti-. Henning took Sogdian kurθ- “garment” as the same word as kərəti-, and Benveniste linked Persian kurta to the Sogdian. Sims-Williams, publishing Bactrian kuratīg “shirt”, calls it “a word of unknown but probably non-Iranian origin”, which would leave room for a substrate source such as the BMAC (2007: 224). Although Sims-Williams did not gloss through the full extent of the Iranian forms, or look too deeply into it.

I have opted otherwise, and agree with the other scholars who do derive it through Iranian, because of the following reasons. Avestan kərəti-, Ossetian kærc and Khotanese kīḍ- show the regular outcomes of *kr̥ti- at opposite ends of the Iranian world. The root has an Indo-European etymology, *(s)ker-t- “cut”, shared with Vedic kṛtí- “dagger”, and the Pahlavi commentary renders kərəti- as kirrēnīdag “cut”. The forms Sims-Williams compares are the u-forms, and they can all be accounted for within Iranian. The Sogdian θ comes from the regular change ty > θy. Persian kurta, Arabic qurṭaq, Pashto kurta and Ossetian kuræt are loans. A word with a regular Iranian etymology doesn’t need a substrate source.

To clarify for anyone who doesn't know, the stem is important for derivation as it carries the evidence of descent, while the the suffixes don’t necessarily. A stem passes down through Iranian forms and goes through its regular sound changes, so kurt- with t, kurθ- with θ and kurd with d each show where a form sits on the tree. Suffixes are added afresh by each language and are often swapped or borrowed depending on the application and context.

Given this etymology, the identification of the Cyrtians with the Kurds is even stronger than it already was, as the forms are an exact match. Identifications with the Carduchi, Qardu, among other folk proposals have become even more improbable, both linguistically and historically, than they already were.

From Ari X : https://x.com/kurdicompendium/status/2114719100958044167?s=46 ~2026-57060-47 (talk) 14:39, 26 October 2026 (UTC)

Declined As this is no real edit request and the talk-page of said article isn't protected....be so kind and bring it up there so it can be evaluated. Lectonar (talk) 14:42, 26 October 2026 (UTC)

Handled requests

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.