| Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here. | ||
|---|---|---|
|
Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection). After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:ProtectedPages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to remove obvious vandalism.
Request addition of protection to a page, or increasing the current protection level
Request removal of protection from a page, or reducing the current protection level
Request a specific edit be made to a protected page
Request the non-urgent protection of multiple pages that do not require immediate administrator attention
| ||
Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: **Request for Page Protection: Painda Khel**
I would like to request semi-protection for the Wikipedia article **[Painda Khel](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Painda_Khel)**.
This article contains historical and genealogical information about the Painda Khel clan, its association with the Tanoli tribe, and its historical background in the Hazara region of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
Since the article covers specific historical and genealogical information, I believe it is important to maintain its accuracy, reliability, and consistency.
I respectfully request that an administrator review the article and consider applying semi-protection to reduce the risk of unconstructive edits, vandalism, or the addition of unsupported information.
I understand that Wikipedia is a collaborative encyclopedia and that legitimate improvements by other editors should remain possible. My intention is not to claim ownership of the article, but to help preserve the accuracy and quality of its content.
Thank you for your consideration.
~2026-60460-61 (talk) 11:38, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Recent vandalizing by numerous temporary accounts; possible sockpuppetry. HelloIAmLucas (talk) 11:39, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: User request within own user space. Not going to be on the account a lot, and therefore cannot check for vandalism. Requesting this just as a safe measure. If this gets declined, could you at least do pending changes protection? Larawag✦ (talk) 13:05, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Socking of Salebot1. Beyhive Navy (talk) 13:08, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing, with multiple WP:NOTAFORUM violations. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 14:28, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Temporary semi-protection requested. On November 13, a temporary account restored a section that was removed, without an edit summary. The same account made another substantial addition on November 14, which another editor removed as out of scope. There were also several edits by temporary accounts with no explanatory summary early on November 15, which were later reverted. Dragonspark (talk) 16:16, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – might wanna go longer since this page was protected in the past and the socks have returned. -- Wesoree (talk·contribs) 17:00, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruption. Block evasion. - FlightTime (open channel) 17:24, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
Reason: The previously temporary account vandal returned despite the IP ban, now under Lunive3890 name. (Oh, he is using more than one accout - Beveile89320 showed up) Smeagol 17 (talk) 17:28, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated addition of AI slop by TA who is hopping between IPs. msk 17:53, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandalised the article, now his red link is doing the same with his single purpose account. The same attack happened here, which is protected now: Hunyadi family I think this article need a permanent protection against not autoconfirmed editors. This is an obsessed topic, even in real life https://hungarytoday.hu/romanian-citizen-removes-flag-from-hungarian-monument-in-belgrade/ OrionNimrod (talk) 18:00, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Contentious topics/Arab–Israeli conflict. Equivalent-Text2598 (talk) 18:12, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated addition of unsourced content by TAs. 10mmsocket (talk) 18:23, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Potential vandalism or unauthorized appropriation by individuals affiliated with major AI technology companies. Mickwellington (talk) 18:26, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Over the past month or so, IP editors have been disruptively editing the page in a way to promote puffery for the subject. I don't know why, as the subject hasn't done anything recently to attract such attention. I've tried to return the page to normal and they just keep coming back like weeds. Semi-protection or Extended confirmed protection should get a handle on that. Trillfendi (talk) 19:16, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Continued temporary account vandalism Mellamelina (talk) 19:27, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Indefinite protection is necessary since this is a template that is used in many significant articles, and anything written in the template will appear in those articles. Annh07 (talk) 20:33, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent WP:TE – The talk page is a cesspool of WP:PAs. tgeorgescu (talk) 20:34, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 20:53, 15 November 2026 (UTC)
Please update the worldwide gross collection of Ramayana: Part One (2026) to ₹1033.55 crore.
Source: https://www.sacnilk.com/quicknews/ramayana_part_1_2026_Box_Office_Collection_Day_8
The source reports an India gross of ₹675.05 crore and an overseas gross of ₹358.50 crore, bringing the worldwide gross to ₹1033.55 crore. Chandreshkhare34 (talk) 18:36, 12 November 2026 (UTC)
Link the article List of Zanjeerain characters in the Filmography section and the title Zanjeerain than the Role of Rabiya. Link Rabiya with List of Zanjeerain characters. Thanks Trubres (talk) 21:58, 14 November 2026 (UTC)
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.