Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion

Skip to: Table of contents / current discussions / old business (bottom). Purge this page

WP:MFDWP:MFD

Please do not nominate your user page (or subpages of it) for deletion here. Instead, add {{db-userreq}} at the top of any such page you no longer wish to keep; an administrator will then delete the page for you. See Wikipedia:Speedy deletion § U1 for more information.

Miscellany for deletion (MfD) is a place where Wikipedians decide what should be done with problematic pages in the namespaces which aren't covered by other specialized deletion discussion areas. Items sent here are usually discussed for seven days; then they are either deleted by an administrator or kept, based on community consensus as evident from the discussion, consistent with policy, and with careful judgment of the rough consensus if required.

Filtered versions of the page are available at

Information on the process

What may be nominated for deletion here:

Pages not covered by other XFD venues, including pages in these namespaces: Draft:, Help:, Portal:, MediaWiki:, Wikipedia: (including WikiProjects), User:, TimedText:, MOS:, Event: and the various Talk: namespaces
Userboxes, regardless of the namespace
File description pages when the file itself is hosted on Commons
Any other page, that is not in article space, where there is dispute as to the correct XFD venue.

Requests to undelete pages deleted after discussion here, and debate whether discussions here have been properly closed, both take place at Wikipedia:Deletion review, in accordance with Wikipedia's undeletion policy.

Notes

↑ The vast majority of pages in the MOS: namespace are redirects, which should be discussed at RfD. MfD is only applicable for the handful of its non-redirect pages.

Before nominating a page for deletion

Before nominating a page for deletion, please consider these guidelines:

Deleting pages in your own userspace	If you want to have your own userpage or a draft you created deleted, there is no need to list it here; simply tag it with {{db-userreq}} or {{db-u1}} if it is a userpage, or {{db-author}} or {{db-g7}} if it is a draft. If you wish to clear your user talk page or sandbox, just blank it.
Deletions in draftspace	Unlike articles, drafts are generally not deleted solely due to lack of demonstrated notability or context. Drafts that have not been edited in six months may be deleted under criterion for speedy deletion G13 and do not need nomination here. Duplications in draftspace are usually satisfactorily fixed by redirection. If the material is in mainspace, redirect the draft to the article, or a section of the article. If multiple draft pages on the same topic have been created, tag them for merging. See WP:SRE. For further information on draft deletion, including when nomination here is appropriate, see WP:NMFD
Deleting pages in other people's userspace	Consider explaining your concerns on the user's talk page with a personal note or by adding `{{subst:Uw-userpage}} ~~~~` to their talk page. This step assumes good faith and civility; often the user is simply unaware of the guidelines, and the page can either be fixed or speedily deleted using {{db-userreq}}. Take care not to bite newcomers – sometimes using the {{subst:welcome}} or {{subst:welcomeg}} template and a pointer to WP:UP would be best first. Problematic userspace material is often addressed by the User pages guidelines including in some cases removal by any user or tagging to clarify the content or to prevent external search engine indexing. (Examples include copies of old, deleted, or disputed material, problematic drafts, promotional material, offensive material, inappropriate links, 'spoofing' of the MediaWiki interface, disruptive HTML, invitations or advocacy of disruption, certain kinds of images and image galleries, etc) If your concern relates to these areas consider these approaches as well, or instead of, deletion. User pages about Wikipedia-related matters by established users usually do not qualify for deletion. Articles that were recently deleted at AfD and then moved to userspace are generally not deleted unless they have lingered in userspace for an extended period of time without improvement to address the concerns that resulted in their deletion at AfD, or their content otherwise violates a global content policy such as our policies on Biographies of living persons that applies to any namespace.
Policies, guidelines and process pages	Established pages and their sub-pages should not be nominated, as such nominations will probably be considered disruptive, and the ensuing discussions closed early. This is not a forum for modifying or revoking policy. Instead consider tagging the page as {{historical}} and/or moving it into the historical archive, or redirecting it somewhere. Proposals still under discussion generally should not be nominated. If you oppose a proposal, discuss it on the policy page's discussion page. Consider being bold and improving the proposal. Modify the proposal so that it gains consensus. Also note that even if a policy fails to gain consensus, it is often useful to retain it as a historical record, for the benefit of future editors.
WikiProjects and their subpages	It is generally preferable that inactive WikiProjects not be deleted, but instead be marked as {{WikiProject status\|inactive}}, redirected to a relevant WikiProject, or changed to a task force of a parent WikiProject, unless the WikiProject was incompletely created or is entirely undesirable. WikiProjects that were never very active and which do not have substantial historical discussions (meaning multiple discussions over an extended period of time) on the project talk page should not be tagged as {{historical}}; reserve this tag for historically active projects that have, over time, been replaced by other processes or that contain substantial discussion (as defined above) of the organization of a significant area of Wikipedia. Before deletion of an inactive project with a founder or other formerly active members who are active elsewhere on Wikipedia, consider moving it into the historical archive, or userfication. Notify the main WikiProject talk page when nominating any WikiProject subpage, in addition to standard notification of the page creator.
Alternatives to deletion	Normal editing that does not require the use of any administrator tools, such as merging the page into another page or renaming it, can often resolve problems. Pages in the wrong namespace (e.g. an article in Wikipedia namespace), can simply be moved and then tag the redirect for speedy deletion using {{db-g6\|rationale=it's a redirect left after a cross-namespace move}}. Notify the author of the original article of the cross-namespace move.
Alternatives to MfD	Speedy deletion If the page clearly satisfies a "general" or "user" speedy deletion criterion, tag it with the appropriate template. Be sure to read the entire criterion, as some do not apply in the user space.

Please familiarize yourself with the following policies

Wikipedia:Deletion policy – our deletion policy that describes how we delete things by consensus
Wikipedia:Deletion process – our guidelines on how to list anything for deletion
Wikipedia:Guide to deletion – a how-to guide whose protocols on discussion format and shorthands also apply here
Wikipedia:Project namespace – our guidelines on "Wikipedia" namespace pages
Wikipedia:User page – our guidelines on user pages and user subpages
Wikipedia:Userboxes – our guideline on userboxes

How to list pages for deletion

Shortcut

WP:MFDHOWTOWP:MFDHOWTO

Please check the aforementioned list of deletion discussion areas to check that you are in the right area. Then follow these instructions:

Instructions on listing pages for deletion:

To list a page for deletion, follow this three-step process: (replace PageName with the name of the page, including its namespace, to be deleted)

Note: Users must be logged in to complete step II. An unregistered user who wishes to nominate a page for deletion should complete step I and post their reasoning on Wikipedia talk:Miscellany for deletion with a notification to a registered user to complete the process.

I.

Edit PageName:

Enter the following text at the top of the page you are listing for deletion:

{{mfd|1={{subst:FULLPAGENAME}}}}
for a second or subsequent nomination use {{mfdx|2nd}}

or

{{mfd|GroupName}}
if nominating several similar related pages in an umbrella nomination. Choose a suitable name as GroupName and use it on each page.

If the nomination is for a userbox or similarly transcluded page, use {{subst:mfd-inline}} so as to not mess up the formatting for the userbox.

Use {{subst:mfd-inline|GroupName}} for a group nomination of several related userboxes or similarly transcluded pages.

Please include in the edit summary the phrase
Added MfD nomination at [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName]]
replace PageName with the name of the page that is up for deletion.
Please don't mark your edit summary as a minor edit.
Check the "Watch this page" box if you would like to follow the page in your watchlist. This may help you to notice if your MfD tag is removed by someone.
Save the page

II.

Create its MfD subpage.

The resulting MfD box at the top of the page should contain the link "this page's entry"

Click that link to open the page's deletion discussion page.
Insert this text:

{{subst:mfd2| pg={{subst:#titleparts:{{subst:PAGENAME}}||2}}| text=Reason why the page should be deleted}} ~~~~
replacing Reason... with your reasons why the page should be deleted and sign the page. Do not substitute the pagename, as this will occur automatically.

Consider checking "Watch this page" to follow the progress of the debate.
Please use an edit summary such as Creating deletion discussion page for [[PageName]]
replacing PageName with the name of the page you are proposing for deletion.
If appropriate, inform members of the most relevant WikiProjects through one or more "deletion sorting lists". Then add a {{subst:delsort|<topic>|<signature>}} template to the nomination, to insert a note that this has been done.
Save the page.

III.

Add a line to MfD.

Follow this edit link and at the top of the list add a line (a section for the current date will need created if it does not yet exist):

{{subst:mfd3| pg=PageName}}
Put the page's name in place of "PageName".

Include the discussion page's name in your edit summary like
Added [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName]]
replacing PageName with the name of the page you are proposing for deletion.
Save the page.
If nominating a page that has been nominated before, use the page's name in place of "PageName" and add

{{priorxfd|PageName}}
in the nominated page deletion discussion area to link to the previous discussions and then save the page using an edit summary such as
Added [[Template:priorxfd]] to link to prior discussions.

If nominating a page from someone else's userspace, notify them on their main talk page.
For other pages, while not required, it is generally considered civil to notify the good-faith creator and any main contributors of the miscellany that you are nominating. To find the main contributors, look in the page history or talk page of the page and/or use TDS' Article Contribution Counter or Wikipedia Page History Statistics. For your convenience, you may add
{{subst:mfd notice|PageName}} ~~~~
to their talk page in the "edit source" section, replacing PageName with the pagename. Please use an edit summary such as
Notice of deletion discussion at [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName]]
replacing PageName with the name of the nomination page you are proposing for deletion.
If the user has not edited in a while, consider sending the user an email to notify them about the MfD if the MfD concerns their user pages.
If you are nominating a WikiProject, please post a notice at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Council, in addition to the project's talk page and the talk pages of the founder and active members.

Administrator instructions

XfD backlog
v
t
e
V	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Total
CfD	4	18	33	28	83
TfD	0	0	4	8	12
MfD	0	0	0	4	4
FfD	7	12	13	9	41
RfD	0	0	12	59	71
AfD	0	0	0	35	35

Administrator instructions for closing and relisting discussions can be found here.

Archived discussions

A list of archived discussions can be located at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Archived debates.

Current discussions

Pages currently being considered for deletion are indexed by the day on which they were first listed. Please place new listings at the top of the section for the current day. If no section for the current day is present, please start a new section.

November 14, 2026

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jdogw/sandbox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: suppressed. Salvio ^giuliano 11:33, 14 November 2026 (UTC)

User:Jdogw/sandbox

Unsourced biography of a minor. Paradoctor (talk) 00:44, 14 November 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

November 12, 2026

Wikipedia:Edit count

It is contrary to ArbCom's CT policies. Jsjsnja (talk) 22:16, 12 November 2026 (UTC)

Keep - Created in 2005 and describes the concept of an edit count well. I am highly skeptical that this is against arbcom polic(ies); however—if it is, then they have the resources at their disposal to appropriately remedy the page. We shall not be doing so here. — Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 23:40, 12 November 2026 (UTC)
Question can you cite what ARBCOM policy this advice page may be contrary to? TruenoCity (talk) 23:37, 12 November 2026 (UTC)
The ECR policy, it states that non-extended confirmed users cannot make edits in ECR areas except to make edit requests on articles, which implies that the quality of edits equals the edit count, since the ECR policy has no exceptions. ArbCom policies are more important than this. Jsjsnja (talk) 16:33, 13 November 2026 (UTC)

Keep - I see nothing wrong with the page. GarethBaloney (talk) 00:44, 13 November 2026 (UTC)

Why is the first action of someone who joined Wikipedia 4 hours ago to nominate this page for deletion? SK2242 (talk) 02:45, 13 November 2026 (UTC)
Keep or Speedy Keep 3 - The statement that the page is contrary to any policy about contentious topics is ~~nonsense~~seriously mistaken. Robert McClenon (talk) 12:22, 13 November 2026 (UTC)

Comment [Citation needed] ~2026-54957-04 (talk) 12:33, 13 November 2026 (UTC)
Speedy keep either SK2 or SK3. Choucas 🐦‍⬛ 14:02, 13 November 2026 (UTC)
Keep No valid reason for deletion, the essay is still good advice. I'm not quite understanding the reasoning that this is contrary to ArbCom policy, however, you can discuss it in the page's talk page or boldly edit it. TruenoCity (talk) 17:11, 13 November 2026 (UTC)
Comment - I will try to explain what the nominator may be thinking. ArbCom rules about contentious topics sometimes limit participation to extended-confirmed users, using a particular type of edit count. The essay defines several types of edit counts, including the one that is applicable to contentious material that is limited to extended-confirmed users. The essay also defines other types of edit counts, but they don't conflict with ArbCom policy because they apply in other situations. Robert McClenon (talk) 07:11, 14 November 2026 (UTC)

November 9, 2026

Draft:Castle - Make and Play

AI slop, the author says that they did not use AI, but the bot somehow created the text by itself. Cheese240 (talk) 17:59, 9 November 2026 (UTC)

They also have another draft, Draft:Castle (social network), though I doubt it is AI. Cheese240 (talk) 18:09, 9 November 2026 (UTC)

If eligible for G15, then it should be speedied. Otherwise, keep to allow the AfC rejection its due (it has not been resubmitted since) and to enable the established wiles of G13. — Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 20:17, 9 November 2026 (UTC)
I doubt that it is eligible for G15, which is why I did not speedy delete it. Cheese240 (talk) 21:33, 9 November 2026 (UTC)
~~Weak Keep~~ - It isn't necessary to delete rejected drafts unless they are tendentiously resubmitted, but the creation of this draft was a tendentious submission . Robert McClenon (talk) 22:00, 9 November 2026 (UTC)
There are tens if not hundreds of AI drafts that are created and submitted every day to AfC. Most are not G15 eligible. Best thing is to wait for G13. SK2242 (talk) 01:47, 10 November 2026 (UTC)

Upon taking a further look Delete per what User:Athanelar has noted on the draft, which is that this is an effort to get around the previous rejection of Draft:Castle (social network) and thereby is tendentious resubmission. SK2242 (talk) 01:52, 10 November 2026 (UTC)

Delete per SK2242, this indeed looks like tendentious resubmission. Choucas 🐦‍⬛ 10:28, 10 November 2026 (UTC)

Delete as tendentiously resubmitted. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:11, 11 November 2026 (UTC)
@SK2242, Choucas, and Robert McClenon: Neither Draft:Castle - Make and Play nor Draft:Castle (social network) has been resubmitted after either was respectively rejected. If the pattern is truly new drafts to skirt rejection (are there more examples in this particular chain?), then how will this deletion help (however—it would be burdensome to list future such drafts here, as would seemingly be necessary with them being un-speediable, if the pattern continued)? It seems that rejection is working, at least in the isolated sense. Additionally—if it is just two in this particular circumstance, then perhaps some good faith is not unwarranted (the creators are technically distinct, with one being a TA and one being a new user; even if they were the same individual in theory, perhaps they e.g. thought registration would make a difference). It is also, of course, possible that I am missing something. — Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 01:16, 12 November 2026 (UTC)

Draft: Castle (social network) was rejected at 17:39 on 9 November , Draft:Castle - Make and Play was submitted 12 minutes later . SK2242 (talk) 15:43, 12 November 2026 (UTC)

delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 02:24, 12 November 2026 (UTC)

User:MXWLVJ/sandbox

WP:NOTBLOG: Also not a student gossip newspaper. Paradoctor (talk) 14:22, 9 November 2026 (UTC)

Delete @MXWLVJ no matter what you personal projects outside of Wikipedia are, your sandbox here is meant to be used for Wikipedia purposes, so you should move your stuff away before it (very likely) gets deleted. Choucas 🐦‍⬛ 16:18, 9 November 2026 (UTC)
Weak Keep - There is very little need to delete useless sandboxen unless they are harmful. They are not self-clearing, but they generally do very little if any harm. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:03, 9 November 2026 (UTC)
Except for the age requirement, this would be WP:U7. Paradoctor (talk) 00:49, 10 November 2026 (UTC)

In general I would be on the side of a week keap by default as well for a main sandbox, but in this case I think it is too obvious that we are in WP:NOT territory to keep it. I would still prefer for this kind of page to be simply left alone honestly, but it is not like MfD is buckling under the weight of too many nominations right now. Choucas 🐦‍⬛ 10:31, 10 November 2026 (UTC)
Delete contains multiple negative statements about BLPs, including the use of slurs. Likely G10 SK2242 (talk) 01:55, 10 November 2026 (UTC)
Delete. WP:NOTWEBHOST. Unsourced BLP. Year 7 school kids should not be posting about each other on a public website. SmokeyJoe (talk) 20:18, 11 November 2026 (UTC)
delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 02:22, 12 November 2026 (UTC)

Seems it's been replaced by"This page has been deleted" St☆rlet! (Talk to me!) (Library) 20:07, 12 November 2026 (UTC)

Delete anyway. BLP violations are unacceptable even in the page history. If the user wants to use their sandbox they can simply create it again after this is deleted. SK2242 (talk) 21:44, 12 November 2026 (UTC)

Delete - WP:NOTWEBHOST.

Writing "Welcome to our educational Wikipedia-style website!" on the actual Wikipedia website is... a choice. It also has several rude comments about presumably real people. GarethBaloney (talk) 00:51, 13 November 2026 (UTC)

Draft:Christine Zhao (赵倩)

Draft already exists at Draft:Christine Zhao Bennett Li11 (Talk to Me) 01:12, 9 November 2026 (UTC)

Unworthy of MfD. Redirect as an editorial action. Talk to EscherGodel (talk · contribs) about why they are making content forks in draftspace. SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:33, 9 November 2026 (UTC)

Hello @SmokeyJoe @Bennett Li11, yes I am happy for Draft:Christine Zhao (赵倩) to be deleted and only KEEP Draft:Christine Zhao . The latter was created cause the Chinese character in the former seemed to cause technical issues for its publishing. Thanks. EscherGodel (talk) 09:07, 9 November 2026 (UTC)

Delete per author’s wish. SmokeyJoe (talk) 20:23, 11 November 2026 (UTC)

Redirect to Draft:Christine Zhao for similar reasons to why Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:ƛ̕ax̌ʷadis was kept. No need to list such pages here. — Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 12:47, 9 November 2026 (UTC)
Redirect per creator's explanation. Choucas 🐦‍⬛ 16:20, 9 November 2026 (UTC)
redirect per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:23, 13 November 2026 (UTC)

November 8, 2026

Wikipedia:WikiProject Protista/New article listing

Editors except me seem to be uninterested in adding recently created pages to here, including the project and this page's creator Snoteleks, so some recent pages are missing. I think this page should be deleted unless there's an easy way to set some kind of automation here. If a bot will be used, unless it's ready, in my opinion there's no need for this page. Jako96 (talk) 16:15, 8 November 2026 (UTC)

Comment: It should be possible to use InceptionBot for this purpose. Chess enjoyer (talk) 16:32, 8 November 2026 (UTC)
I just notified Snoteleks of this MFD. Chess enjoyer (talk) 16:45, 8 November 2026 (UTC)
Oh yes that'd be better, I should've done it before. Jako96 (talk) 16:48, 8 November 2026 (UTC)

That's nice. If that can be done, then it'd be better then deleting. Jako96 (talk) 16:47, 8 November 2026 (UTC)

Support. I created this page very early in the wikiproject, inspired by some other project that I saw had a similar feature; however it is very tiring to maintain it and I have been meaning to delete it.

If anyone knows some way to automate new article alerts, I would love to know. I would like to keep it simple, as a section of the main project page, if at all. — Snoteleks (talk) 17:23, 8 November 2026 (UTC)

Weak Delete as long as we are here. Robert McClenon (talk) 07:47, 9 November 2026 (UTC)
Mark historical since that is prety much what it is now. It is not a lot of work to remove the tab from the menu bar anyways. If someone changes their mind or wants to implement a technical solution as mentioned above it will be better that the page still exists. Choucas 🐦‍⬛ 16:22, 9 November 2026 (UTC)

User:Iskazzz/sandbox/mario

This is literally just a copy of several existing articles made by a indefinitely banned user. There is literally no reason to keep this. (Oinkers42) (talk) 14:38, 8 November 2026 (UTC)

Blank with {{userspace blanked}}. Mayhaps a {{workpage}} of sorts; no need to list such pages here. — Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 12:42, 9 November 2026 (UTC)
Blanking is probably the best thing to do, after leaving this page alone I suppose. Choucas 🐦‍⬛ 16:24, 9 November 2026 (UTC)
blank per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:33, 11 November 2026 (UTC)

November 7, 2026

Draft:Voxeaa

As explained here, I nominate the page for deletion due to privacy concerns and the fact that it is likely a self-promotion of a not-notable person. Bencemac (talk) 19:13, 7 November 2026 (UTC)

Comment Was this an autobiography of the author? If so, I think it is safe to assume they would like their page deleted. If not, I would still lean weak delete as a promotional page. TruenoCity (talk) 21:11, 7 November 2026 (UTC)

WP:SLAP User:Bencemac for shining floodlights on a privacy concern, thus completely countering privacy. The draft is a typical musician of unlikely Wikipedia-notability that will be quietly deleted per G13 if no one works on it. Becemac has now created enduring pointers to someone who wanted to vanish.
I support deletion of this MfD discussion with no action on the draft. SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:58, 7 November 2026 (UTC)

The user wanted to be vanished and worked solely on this draft. I might be wrong, and the user may not have this draft in their mind, that is a possibility, I understand. However, if that is the case, the question still stands: is the subject notable enough? I do not think so. I must say that I do not appreciate your tone at all, so leave me alone with slap. This is neither respectful nor friendly, especially when I was told to come here. Bencemac (talk) 10:15, 9 November 2026 (UTC)

Did User:Whpq tell you to come here? Does this draft need deletion? No. Do not start community discussions due to a privacy concern. See Wikipedia:Oversight. SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:30, 9 November 2026 (UTC)

I told them to come to MFD if they still thought deletion was necessary after I declined their speedy deletion request of author-requested as there is no evidence that the author has requested it. -- Whpq (talk) 14:12, 9 November 2026 (UTC)

Comment please leave useless drafts alone instead of bringing them to MfD, especially when there is a chance it is an autobio of a non-notable person... In the case where there is a request dealing with privacy issues, dealing it with it privately is probably the better way to go. Choucas 🐦‍⬛ 16:30, 9 November 2026 (UTC)

November 6, 2026

Draft:Daffy Season

page already exists SBF2004 (talk) 17:25, 6 November 2026 (UTC)

Redirect to Daffy Season. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:33, 6 November 2026 (UTC)
WP:SLAP User:SBF2004 for failing to note that the draft preexists the article by two years, and for sloppy misuse of “already” to imply otherwise.
The new article is less than two days old, written over a redirect.
Looking at the pages in parallel, is suspect User:Low-gee7212014 has violative d copyright policy by using the draft and failing to attribute its authors.
New article writers, including writing government old redirects, should be required to respect drafting. SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:12, 7 November 2026 (UTC)
History merge (or otherwise remedy the attribution issue if there is a truly better solution) per SmokeyJoe, then redirect (in the spirit of WP:RDRAFT) the draft title there. — Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 12:38, 9 November 2026 (UTC)
Comment - I copied all of the categories from the draft to the mainspace article two days ago. The draft can now be redirected to the mainspace article per above. The Media Expert (talk) 13:29, 9 November 2026 (UTC)
Histmerge then redirect per Godsy. Choucas 🐦‍⬛ 16:33, 9 November 2026 (UTC)

Old business

Everything below this point is old business; the 7-day review period that began 11:40, 7 November 2026 (UTC) ended today on 14 November 2026. Editors may continue to add comments until the discussion is closed but they should keep in mind that the discussion below this marker may be closed at any time without further notice. Discussions that have already been closed will be removed from the page automatically by Legobot and need no further action.

November 5, 2026

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Nosterdania userboxes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Salvio ^giuliano 08:47, 14 November 2026 (UTC)

Nosterdania userboxes

These unused userboxes are for a hoax country and its language. The author stopped editing six years ago. —⁠andrybak (talk) 21:39, 5 November 2026 (UTC)

Support per nom. Shocksingularity (talk) 08:22, 6 November 2026 (UTC)

Speedy delete per wp:G3. Magikarp fan, Arenghtqru888 lol ( hopefully I don't get trouted...) 14:42, 6 November 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom TruenoCity (talk) 15:40, 6 November 2026 (UTC)

Speedy delete per WP:G3. Choucas 🐦‍⬛ 16:30, 6 November 2026 (UTC)

Delete All or Speedy Delete as G3, hoax. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:55, 7 November 2026 (UTC)
See also Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2026 November 6. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:04, 7 November 2026 (UTC)
Delete hoax --Schützenpanzer (Talk) 14:44, 8 November 2026 (UTC)
delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:38, 9 November 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Draft:Zayd Vance Silkenson

Clearly fails WP:NBIO. a wondrous raven (talk) 06:24, 5 November 2026 (UTC)

~~Neutral~~ Please see Wikipedia:Leave useless drafts alone. Drafts are not checked for notability. However, this page is rather promotional in tone. TruenoCity (talk) 06:38, 5 November 2026 (UTC)

Delete overly promotional in tone, reads like an advert TruenoCity (talk) 03:42, 6 November 2026 (UTC)

̶'̶'̶'̶K̶e̶e̶p̶'̶'̶'̶ ̶p̶e̶r̶ ̶[̶[̶w̶p̶:̶l̶u̶d̶a̶]̶]̶.̶ ̶a̶l̶s̶o̶,̶ ̶h̶o̶w̶ ̶d̶i̶d̶ ̶y̶o̶u̶ ̶n̶o̶m̶i̶n̶a̶t̶e̶ ̶i̶t̶ ̶4̶ ̶m̶i̶n̶u̶t̶e̶s̶ ̶a̶f̶t̶e̶r̶ ̶i̶t̶ ̶w̶a̶s̶ ̶c̶r̶e̶a̶t̶e̶d̶?̶ :Neutral there's wp:luda, but the creator of the draft has also self-advrtised in an article, and someone above said this article sounds very advertisy Magikarp fan, Arenghtqru888 lol ( hopefully I don't get trouted...) 15:57, 5 November 2026 (UTC)

Delete as an unsourced BLP. There is a non-source link, which doesn’t count as a source. SmokeyJoe (talk) 19:52, 5 November 2026 (UTC)

Delete not because of notability issues but because this looks like an advert pretending to be an article --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:38, 6 November 2026 (UTC)
Neutral - Drafts are not deleted for advertising content unless they are blatant and qualify for G11, which this does not. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:19, 6 November 2026 (UTC)

November 4, 2026

User:KTMWikipedia8000/sandbox3

Withdrawing, doesn't need to be deleted. Sorry to nominate this for deletion as the author seems to just be doing some good-faith testing, but the information here is partly fictional. For example, The Walt Disney Company is renamed to "Buena Vista", with Lionsgate being listed as one of their divisons, and "NBCUniversal" is renamed to "CBSUniversal".NewAccount7295 (talk) 18:53, 4 November 2026 (UTC)

Keep and speedy close. As a sandbox, absolutely no harm is being done here. Skyshiftertalk 19:33, 4 November 2026 (UTC)

What part of the speedy keep criteria does this nomination fail? SK2242 (talk) 02:43, 5 November 2026 (UTC)

Delete WP:NOT. Wikipedia isn’t a host for fictional content sandboxing. SK2242 (talk) 02:43, 5 November 2026 (UTC)
Neutral pending a stronger argument either way in the next five days. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:21, 6 November 2026 (UTC)
Keep the author seems to just be doing some good-faith testing and that is perfectly fine. A test can be partly fictional. If you feel sorry about nominating a user page for deletion, that is usually a good sign that you should not be doing it in the first place in my opinion. Choucas 🐦‍⬛ 10:33, 10 November 2026 (UTC)

November 3, 2026

Template:User Countries and Flags 2026

This unused Sorani-language userbox should be deleted because it seems to have been created in English Wikipedia by mistake. The text of the userbox mentions "Countries and Flags 2026 Editathon", which doesn't exist on English Wikipedia, but it does exist on Sorani Wikipedia: ckb:ویکیپیدیا:ئێدیتاسۆنى وڵات و ئاڵاکان - ٢٠٢٦. —⁠andrybak (talk) 22:14, 3 November 2026 (UTC)

Transwiki if doable, otherwise delete. Choucas 🐦‍⬛ 10:37, 10 November 2026 (UTC)

Closed discussions

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Archived debates

[1] The vast majority of pages in the MOS: namespace are redirects, which should be discussed at RfD. MfD is only applicable for the handful of its non-redirect pages.