A Jan 2023 RfC found "no consensus", which prevents inclusion. CopyleftEverything (talk) 02:19, 17 October 2026 (UTC)

Supporters argue that “campaign” is a reasonable paraphrase of the documented efforts, which involved individuals and organizations publicly advocating for Khalil's deportation using social media and other means.


Opposers argue that describing these activities as a “campaign” goes beyond what the sources establish, because the sources do not establish that the participants were acting as part of a planned or coordinated effort.

Prior discussion here. JerryGraf (talk) 00:56, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

and residential facilities have recently been removed.

Some of this information was supported by independent reliable sources. The concern raised was that Wikipedia is not a directory or that the information has insufficient encyclopedic value.

Question: What level of independently sourced information about the university's faculties, departments, and residential facilities is appropriate for this article?

I am seeking input from uninvolved editors on whether concise, encyclopedic information should be retained while directory-like details are removed.

Please consider relevant Wikipedia policies and guidelines and focus on the content rather than the editors involved.0ximjub43r (talk) 19:37, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Pinging previous participants in discussions about this: @Kwamikagami: @Boynamedsue: @Sirfurboy: @TaivoLinguist: @Cnilep: 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 04:45, 17 October 2026 (UTC)

1. Split into European and Asian articles. (Right now)
2. Merge to Eurasian article.
3. Split by country.

GiftedIceCream 20:34, 24 October 2026 (UTC)

Please enter Yes or No, or the equivalent, in the Survey, with a statement. Yes means to make the substitutions in the diff.

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:28, 27 October 2026 (UTC)

In the previous thread on this page, it was stated that there is a long-standing local consensus within the Middle-earth Wikiproject to avoid using non-free images (such as images from film adaptations) as the lead images in character articles, such as Frodo Baggins, Gimli or Aragorn. OrdinaryOtter (talk) 17:48, 25 October 2026 (UTC)

Specifically, "South Asian cinema, broadly construed" should be understood to include at a minimum films as well as all associated cast and crew (actors, directors, musical directors, etc.) including but not limited to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh.

A. Status quo: South Asian cinema remains under the broader WP:CT/SA but is not subject to specific subtopic restrictions

B. South Asian cinema, broadly construed, is noted as a subtopic of CT/SA and placed under the extended-confirmed restriction.

C. Article creation in the topic area is restricted to editors with extended-confirmed permissions. Other editing within the topic is placed under autoconfirmed restriction.

D. The whole topic is placed under autoconfirmed restriction only.

Worth noting that the proposals for autoconfirmed restriction are without precedent as far as I'm aware.

Answers which were already given during the RFCBEFORE discussion (included below under 'Discussion') have been transcluded into the 'Survey' subsection. Courtesy pings for those editors in case they want to modify their responses at all: IrisChronomia, Gurkubondinn, Jéské Couriano, CoffeeCrumbs, CNMall41, ABx11

Athanelar (talk) 10:57, 23 October 2026 (UTC)

BlueboyLINY (talk) 06:21, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Yes/No – GlowstoneUnknown (Talk) 13:30, 19 October 2026 (UTC)

A Jan 2023 RfC found "no consensus", which prevents inclusion. CopyleftEverything (talk) 02:19, 17 October 2026 (UTC)

1. Should the content be restored while editors continue to address previously-raised WP:OR/WP:SYNTH concerns relating to the article?
2. Should the content remain removed until each section is manually reviewed and re-added to the article?

Alexandraaaacs1989 (talk) 23:44, 15 October 2026 (UTC)

1. Zionism
2. the State of Israel's systemic segregation and discrimination against Palestinians
3. the Gaza genocide?

إيان (talk) 21:09, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

Please enter Yes or No, or the equivalent, in the Survey, with a statement. Yes means to make the substitutions in the diff.

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:28, 27 October 2026 (UTC)

Specifically, "South Asian cinema, broadly construed" should be understood to include at a minimum films as well as all associated cast and crew (actors, directors, musical directors, etc.) including but not limited to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh.

A. Status quo: South Asian cinema remains under the broader WP:CT/SA but is not subject to specific subtopic restrictions

B. South Asian cinema, broadly construed, is noted as a subtopic of CT/SA and placed under the extended-confirmed restriction.

C. Article creation in the topic area is restricted to editors with extended-confirmed permissions. Other editing within the topic is placed under autoconfirmed restriction.

D. The whole topic is placed under autoconfirmed restriction only.

Worth noting that the proposals for autoconfirmed restriction are without precedent as far as I'm aware.

Answers which were already given during the RFCBEFORE discussion (included below under 'Discussion') have been transcluded into the 'Survey' subsection. Courtesy pings for those editors in case they want to modify their responses at all: IrisChronomia, Gurkubondinn, Jéské Couriano, CoffeeCrumbs, CNMall41, ABx11

Athanelar (talk) 10:57, 23 October 2026 (UTC)

1. Zionism
2. the State of Israel's systemic segregation and discrimination against Palestinians
3. the Gaza genocide?

إيان (talk) 21:09, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

and residential facilities have recently been removed.

Some of this information was supported by independent reliable sources. The concern raised was that Wikipedia is not a directory or that the information has insufficient encyclopedic value.

Question: What level of independently sourced information about the university's faculties, departments, and residential facilities is appropriate for this article?

I am seeking input from uninvolved editors on whether concise, encyclopedic information should be retained while directory-like details are removed.

Please consider relevant Wikipedia policies and guidelines and focus on the content rather than the editors involved.0ximjub43r (talk) 19:37, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

So, should the internet/Internet be capitalized or uncapitalized? –Maltazarian ^{ᚾparley${\displaystyle \lor }$investigateᛅ} 15:10, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

Specifically, "South Asian cinema, broadly construed" should be understood to include at a minimum films as well as all associated cast and crew (actors, directors, musical directors, etc.) including but not limited to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh.

A. Status quo: South Asian cinema remains under the broader WP:CT/SA but is not subject to specific subtopic restrictions

B. South Asian cinema, broadly construed, is noted as a subtopic of CT/SA and placed under the extended-confirmed restriction.

C. Article creation in the topic area is restricted to editors with extended-confirmed permissions. Other editing within the topic is placed under autoconfirmed restriction.

D. The whole topic is placed under autoconfirmed restriction only.

Worth noting that the proposals for autoconfirmed restriction are without precedent as far as I'm aware.

Answers which were already given during the RFCBEFORE discussion (included below under 'Discussion') have been transcluded into the 'Survey' subsection. Courtesy pings for those editors in case they want to modify their responses at all: IrisChronomia, Gurkubondinn, Jéské Couriano, CoffeeCrumbs, CNMall41, ABx11

Athanelar (talk) 10:57, 23 October 2026 (UTC)

Option 1: Never (i.e. substitute out all templates in Category:Article shared content templates)

Option 2A (de facto status quo): When content is sufficiently similar between articles that the same wording may be used with only changes in parameters (e.g. {{Named storms intro}} being used for List of named storms (A) to List of named storms (Z))

Option 2B (closest to de jure status quo): Option 2A but only when there is no expectation that the content within the template will need to be edited

Sdkb ^talk 16:05, 22 October 2026 (UTC)

Option 1: Never (i.e. substitute out all templates in Category:Article shared content templates)

Option 2A (de facto status quo): When content is sufficiently similar between articles that the same wording may be used with only changes in parameters (e.g. {{Named storms intro}} being used for List of named storms (A) to List of named storms (Z))

Option 2B (closest to de jure status quo): Option 2A but only when there is no expectation that the content within the template will need to be edited

Sdkb ^talk 16:05, 22 October 2026 (UTC)

Two possible formats are:

| colors = {{color box|navy}}{{color box|green}} navy and green

and

| colors = Navy and green<br>{{color box|navy}}{{color box|green}}

The first places the color boxes before their names, which can help prevent one or more boxes from wrapping to the next line on narrow displays. The second places the names on one line and the boxes on the next.

Would using <br> in this context be consistent with the relevant guidance in MOS:LINEBREAKS and MOS:ACCESSIBILITY? Is the explicit line break unnecessary markup when the boxes-first arrangement may achieve a similar result? Which format is preferable for readability and responsive display, particularly on mobile devices? R.L (talk) 22:42, 21 October 2026 (UTC)