This article needs more citations. (January 2022) |

| Part of a series of articles about |
| Calculus |
|---|
In calculus, the inverse function rule is a formula that expresses the derivative of the inverse of a bijective and differentiable function f in terms of the derivative of f. More precisely, if the inverse of is denoted as , where if and only if , then the inverse function rule is, in Lagrange's notation,
This formula holds in general whenever is continuous and injective on an interval I, with being differentiable at () and where. The same formula is also equivalent to the expression
where denotes the unary derivative operator (on the space of functions) and denotes function composition.
Geometrically, a function and inverse function have graphs that are reflections, in the line . This reflection operation turns the gradient of any line into its reciprocal.
Assuming that has an inverse in a neighbourhood of and that its derivative at that point is non-zero, its inverse is guaranteed to be differentiable at and have a derivative given by the above formula.
The inverse function rule may also be expressed in Leibniz's notation. As that notation suggests,
This relation is obtained by differentiating the equation in terms of x and applying the chain rule, yielding that:
considering that the derivative of x with respect to x is 1.
Let be an invertible (bijective) function, let be in the domain of , and let Let So, Differentiating this equation with respect to , and using the chain rule, one gets
That is,
or
At , however, there is a problem: the graph of the square root function becomes vertical, corresponding to a horizontal tangent for the square function.
Let then we have, assuming :This can be shown using the previous notation . Then we have:
By induction, we can generalize this result for any integer , with , the nth derivative of f(x), and , assuming :
The chain rule given above is obtained by differentiating the identity with respect to y, where . One can continue the same process for higher derivatives. Differentiating the identity twice with respect to x, one obtains
that is simplified further by the chain rule as
Replacing the first derivative, using the identity obtained earlier, we get
which implies
Similarly for the third derivative we have
Using the formula for the second derivative, we get
which implies
In general, higher order derivatives of an inverse function can be expressed with Faà di Bruno's formula. Alternatively, the nth derivative can be written succinctly as an application of a differential operator:
In Lagrange's notation, the second and third derivatives from the examples above can be found as applying the operator and substituting after:
One can also derive the nth-integration of inverse function with base-point a using Cauchy formula for repeated integration whenever :
so that
which agrees with the direct calculation.