This page documents an English Wikipedia deletion guideline. Editors should generally follow it, though exceptions may apply. Substantive edits to this page should reflect consensus. |
Even admins should mostly use proposed deletion and the various deletion venues when they think a page should be deleted. There are a few limited exceptions, which are given at Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion. Every admin should also read and understand Wikipedia:Deletion policy. Once a decision has been made, please document the decision using the procedures at Wikipedia:Deletion process.
Here are some guidelines administrators should follow in making the decision to delete a page, or not, when considering entries on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion and Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion.
If you decide that a page nominated for speedy deletion should not be deleted, simply revert the edit that tagged the page or manually remove the {{db-meta}} derived tag. Briefly explain the reason for refusing the deletion in the edit summary: "Decline A7, does not apply to buildings / books / arcade games / public parks etc", "Decline A7, one source, try PROD / AfD" or "Decline G11, the advertorial language can easily be removed".
The possibility of harm to living subjects must be considered when exercising editorial judgment.
With regard to living people, a closing admin must take into account the policy on Biographies of living persons along with our deletion policy for biographies. When closing an AfD about a living person whose notability is ambiguous, the closing administrator should take into account whether the subject of the article being deleted has asked that it be deleted. The weight to be given to such a request is a matter for the admin's discretion.
Here are some guidelines administrators should follow in making the decision to delete a page or not, when considering entries on Wikipedia:Categories for discussion (commonly abbreviated as WP:CFD, CFD, or cfd).
After closing a CFD as "rename", admins generally program a bot to implement the change; non-admins can request this at WT:CFDW. Alternatively, these are four easy steps to move a small category without using a bot:
It is not hard, just a little time-consuming. Deleting a category (without assistance from a bot) is similar; the references on the member pages have to be deleted manually, and using HOTCAT to remove a category will prompt you to leave an edit summary, so that you can link to the CFD.
Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Closing instructions has helpful information that applies to all template deletions, not just those requiring a discussion.
An administrator can delete some revisions of an article while leaving all remaining ones intact. The effect of using Wikipedia:Revision deletion is that the revisions will remain in the page history, but their deleted contents will be available only to administrators. Use of revision deletion must meet specific criteria.
The historical method Wikipedia:Selective deletion has been deprecated except for history merges.
Since the John Seigenthaler Wikipedia biography controversy, various IP addresses and accounts have been making vandalistic edits using large, libelous edit summaries. Such summaries can be removed from most pages using RevisionDelete. (Note that the previous method of deleting the page and undeleting unaffected revisions placed a large strain on the servers for pages with large histories, so RevisionDelete should be used here.)
Pages that are repeatedly re-created after deletion in unencyclopedic form or against policy can be protected from further re-creation. This practice is commonly known as "padlocking", salting the earth, or simply 'salting'. This is done by one of the following:
Before it was possible to protect a page that did not exist, or was deleted, common practice was to transclude the article onto a page with cascading protection enabled, such as Wikipedia:Protected titles.
Policies
Guidelines
Essays
Information page
Forum or discussion