| This page is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference. Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose has become unclear. To revive discussion, seek broader input via a forum such as the village pump. |
This is an essay. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article or a Wikipedia policy, as it has not been reviewed by the community. |
The following lists the links in Google Search which have used the "https:" prefix (rather than "http:") to connect to Wikipedia pages by secure-server, SSL Internet protocol.
The following Wikipedia pages have been listed in Google with "https:" links:
Category pages:
Project pages:
Template pages:
As discussed about other pages since early April 2013, those articles (such as "Depression (mood)") have also changed in Google to have secure-server, https-prefix links, rather than typical "http:" prefix, as happened to several other articles in March 2013 ("Parabola" or "List of best-selling books" etc.). Although developers think the https-protocol requests have been properly logged, for pageview counts, some people think the pageview counts are still not correct (as undercounting the https transactions in those log files), while other people think that https security certificate alerts, in some browsers (such as MSIE not Firefox), have deterred people from viewing those articles, once their browsers ask about the secure-server access, and hence think the 66%-lower pageviews indicate actual reduction in readers viewing those pages. The reduced pageviews are shown by both stats.grok.se and the German Wiki-tech displays of pageview counts (such as for one-month option "&Zeitraum=1M").
As feared, due to some major articles showing 75% drop in pageviews with Google https-protocol, recent evidence (9 May 2013) has confirmed the stats.grok.se omits the https-protocol pageviews. In tests run during 12 hours on 9 May 2013, over 60 https-prefix pageviews of a Space Shuttle mission-patch image file were ignored, while "http:" views were counted for both images:
Both mission-patch images ("http" for STS-98 and "https" for STS-99) were viewed within minutes of each other, repeatedly during 65 intervals, in the day-long testing of pageviews. The stats.grok.se website has counted only the "http" pageviews and omitted all https-protocol pageviews. A related pageviews test, on 10 May 2013, confirmed article pageviews with https-protocol requests are also omitted, just as for image-description pages. Based on prior pageviews of major articles (see list above: #Pages which have used Google https links), it is suspected that other pageview tools also omit the https-protocol page requests in the counts.