This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. This notice will be automatically removed by RMCD bot (talk) when the backlog is cleared.
Requested moves is a process for requesting the retitling (moving) of an article, template, or project page on Wikipedia. For information on retitling files, categories, and other items, see § When not to use this page.
Any autoconfirmed user can move a page using the "Move" option in the editing toolbar; see how to move a page for more information. If you have no reason to expect a dispute concerning a move, be bold and move the page; however, it may not always be possible or desirable to do this:
Technical reasons may prevent a move; for example, a page may already exist at the target title and require deletion, or the page may be protected from moves. In such cases, see § Requesting technical moves.
Requests to revert recent, undiscussed, controversial moves may be made at WP:RM/TR. If the new name has not become the stable title, the undiscussed move will be reverted. If the new name has become the stable title, a requested move will be needed to determine the article's proper location.
A page should not be moved and a new move discussion should not be opened when there is already an open move request on a talk page. Instead, please participate in the open discussion.
Unregistered and new (not yet autoconfirmed) users are unable to move pages.
Requests are typically processed after seven days. If consensus supports the move at or after this time, a reviewer will perform it. If there is a consensus not to move the page, the request will be closed as "not moved". When consensus remains unclear, the request may be relisted to allow more time, or closed as "no consensus". See Wikipedia:Requested moves/Closing instructions for more details on the process.
Wikipedia:Move review can be used to contest the outcome of a move request as long as all steps are followed. If a discussion on the closer's talk page does not resolve an issue, then a move review will evaluate the close of the move discussion to determine whether or not the contested close was reasonable and consistent with the spirit and intent of common practice, policies, and guidelines.
Autoconfirmed editors may move a page without discussion if all of the following apply:
No article exists at the new target title;
There has been no previous discussion about the title of the page that expressed any objection to a new title; and
It seems unlikely that anyone would reasonably disagree with the move.
If you disagree with a prior bold move, and the new title has not been in place for a long time, you may revert the move yourself. If you cannot revert the move for technical reasons, then you may
request a technical move.
If you are unable to complete a move for technical reasons, you can request a technical move below. This is the correct method if you tried to move a page, but you got an error message saying something like "You do not have permission to move this page, for the following reasons:..." or "This page could not be moved, for the following reason:..."
If you are here because you want an experienced editor to approve of your new article or proposed rename, you are in the wrong place.
Make sure you really need technical assistance before making a request here. Because you are autoconfirmed, you can move most pages yourself. Even if the target page exists, you can sometimes move the page normally if the target is a redirect back to the source page and has 1 revision.
If you need help determining whether it's okay to move the page to a different title, then please follow the instructions at the top of Wikipedia:Requested moves.
To list a technical request: edit the Uncontroversial technical requests subsection or click the big blue button and insert the following code at the bottom of the list, filling in pages and reason:
{{subst:RMassist|current page title|new title|reason=edit summary for the move}}
This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Do not edit the article's talk page, just click the button below.
To request a reversion of a recent undiscussed move: Review the guidelines at WP:RMUM of whether a reversion of an undiscussed move qualifies as uncontroversial and if so, edit the Requests to revert undiscussed moves subsection or click the big blue button and insert the following code at the bottom of the list, filling in pages and reason:
{{subst:RMassist|current page title|new title|reason=edit summary for the move}}
Note that in some cases, clerks, such as administrators or page movers may determine that your request for a reversion does not pass the criteria and may move the request to the contested section or open a formal requested move discussion for potentially controversial moves on your behalf.
If you object to a proposal listed in the uncontroversial technical requests section, please move the request to the Contested technical requests section, append a note on the request elaborating on why, and sign with ~~~~. Consider pinging the requester to let them know about the objection.
If your technical request is contested, or if a contested request is left untouched without reply, create a requested move on the article talk and remove the request from the section here. The fastest and easiest way is to click the "discuss" button at the request, save the talk page, and remove the entry on this page. A bot will automatically remove contested requests after 72 hours of inactivity.
Administration needed
If your request requires an administrator. Usually, do so if the page has been fully protected or move protected (see this guide to which moves need administrators).
This request is necessary, but there is an issue with singular vs. plural. Authoritative historical sources, depending on author, use both "riot" and "riots" and this article does the same. It appears to me that it was one continuous riot that lasted for multiple days, in which case the new article title should be the singular "Hibiya Riot," but let's see if anyone more knowledgeable about this episode can chime in. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 12:55, 25 October 2026 (UTC)
Noting that the lead was changed two days ago to include the proposed title. CNCin solidarity (talk) 10:57, 26 October 2026 (UTC)
Brittany Pierce→Brittany S. PierceBrittany S. Pierce(currently a redirect back to Brittany Pierce) (move·discuss)– this character is most commonly referred to on the show and in official materials as "brittany s. pierce" with her middle initial, not simply "brittany pierce," as her name is a pun on "britney spears." Katal003 (talk) 07:20, 28 October 2026 (UTC)
What about in secondary sources? Thanks! —1isall(talk|contribs) 16:35, 28 October 2026 (UTC)
Requests to revert undiscussed moves
Berber nationalism→BerberismBerberism(currently a redirect back to Berber nationalism) (move·discuss)– I am requesting that the the page be reverted back to Berberism. This is an article describing Berberism, while Berber nationalism is related but still separate to Berberism. Berbism is political movement that advocates for the recognition Berber (Amazigh) identity, languages, and rights in North Africa. Meanwhile Berber Nationalism is a ethnonationalist ideology of the Berber ethnic group which includes self-determination shared by common Berber ethnicity. I was working on on seperate article on Berber nationalism specifically, as Berberism which is much more modern political movement, but I am unable to do so due to the change of the article name MedAdventurer (talk) 19:16, 28 October 2026 (UTC)
PA Media→Press AssociationPress Association(currently a redirect back to PA Media) (move·discuss)– The news agency returned to the name Press Association on 13 October 2026, as reported by Journalism.co.uk and confirmed in the official announcement. Press Association currently redirects to PA Media. Please move the existing article and its talk page to Press Association, preserving the history and leaving PA Media as a redirect. I cannot perform the move because my account lacks permission. The name change has also been raised at Talk:PA Media. Disclosure: I work for Alamy, part of the same group. Rstingu (talk) 16:55, 28 October 2026 (UTC)
@Paperswanflourishing We do not use ALL CAPS in titles (unless it's an acronym or something). Thanks! —1isall(talk|contribs) 00:48, 23 October 2026 (UTC)
Thanks for the note. STACKTV is the brand’s official styling, like STX Entertainment or IKEAPaperswanflourishing (talk) 04:14, 24 October 2026 (UTC)
Then we can just leave the note about that. Thanks! —1isall(talk|contribs) 00:44, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
stx entertainment and ikea are both acronyms Katal003 (talk) 07:23, 28 October 2026 (UTC)
@IsaacMDB23 No improvement since the last AfC decline. So basically, you should finish this process at AfC, improve THE DRAFT and resubmit it there. Thanks. CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 18:39, 25 October 2026 (UTC)
What is there to improve? It says it's because it's "a copy of the article" but it would replace the section in said article, like Le Sserafim and Le Sserafim discography.
Not arguing just genuinely want to know, thanks! IsaacMDB23 (talk) 19:07, 25 October 2026 (UTC)
Yeah, unless you can actually expand the draft far from what it currently is, I agree with the reviewer's comment. Thanks! —1isall(talk|contribs) 15:28, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
KhAD→KHADKHAD(currently a redirect back to KhAD) (move·discuss)– The correct acronym for the agency has always been all caps. The current title has a lower case 'h' A Human of Time (talk) 17:07, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
I still think there's enough sources with a lowercase h that you probably need to open a requested move, I wouldn't say this is uncontroversial. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs|in solidarity}} 21:01, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
Vietic2 you improperly moved the disambiguation by cutting and pasting the content and then changed it to a redirect. Please don't do that. Pages with an edit history need to be moved to avoid making a hash of the attribution in the history. older ≠ wiser 10:34, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
@Vietic2 Also this counts as a primary topic grab, which is controversial. Thanks! —1isall(talk|contribs) 17:34, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
Draft:Hila Klein→Hila KleinHila Klein(currently a redirect instead to H3h3Productions) (move·discuss)– Requesting a move of a completed biography draft over the existing redirect, which has page history and cannot be overwritten by a normal move. The subject is independently notable as the founder and CEO of the streetwear brand Teddy Fresh, with significant coverage in independent reliable sources (e.g. Women's Wear Daily, Uproxx, The Harvard Crimson, People) predating recent events. The draft is written to WP:BLP standards, and the existing redirect target, h3h3Productions, can link to the new article for further reading. If a prior deletion or merge discussion makes this potentially controversial, I am happy for this to be converted to a full requested move discussion. LuredFreezer (talk) 18:22, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
Per the notice at the top, it should go through AfC. Tenshi! (Talk page) 19:40, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
@Tesco250 But this is still a primary topic grab, which is considered controversial. Please see WP:PCM. Thanks! —1isall(talk|contribs) 21:01, 28 October 2026 (UTC)
Administrator needed
Requesting controversial and potentially controversial moves
The discussion process is used for potentially controversial moves. A move is potentially controversial if either of the following applies:
there has been any past debate about the best title for the page;
someone could reasonably disagree with the move.
Use this process if there is any reason to believe a move would be contested. For technical move requests, such as to correct obvious typographical errors, see Requesting technical moves. The technical moves procedure can also be used for uncontroversial moves when the requested title is occupied by an existing article.
Do not create a new move request when one is already open on the same talk page. Instead, consider contributing to the open discussion if you would like to propose another alternative. Multiple closed move requests may be on the same page, but each should have a unique section heading.
Do not create a move request to rename one or more redirects. Redirects cannot be used as current titles in requested moves.
To request a single page move, click on the "Add topic" (or "New section") tab of the talk page of the article you want moved, without adding a new subject/header, inserting this code:
{{subst:requested move|New name|reason=Place here your rationale for the proposed page name change. You don't need to add your signature at the end, as this template will do so automatically.}}
Replace New name with the requested new name of the page (or with a simple question mark, if you want more than one possible new name to be considered). The template will automatically create the heading "Requested move [today's date]" and sign the post for you.
The reasons for the move can be summarized referring to applicable naming convention policies and guidelines, and providing evidence in support. If your reasoning includes search engine results, please prioritize searches limited to reliable sources (e.g. books, news, scholarly papers) over other web results.
There is no need to edit the article in question. Once the above code is added to the Talk page, a bot will automatically add the following notification at the top of the affected page:
A request that this page title be changed is under discussion. Please do not move this page until the discussion is closed.
A single template may be used to request multiple related moves. On one of the talk pages of the affected pages, create a request and format it as below. A sample request for three page moves is shown here (for two page moves, omit the lines for current3 and new3). For four page moves, add lines for current4 and new4, and so on. There is no technical limit on the number of multiple move requests, but before requesting very large multi-moves, consider whether a naming convention should be changed first. Discuss that change on the talk page for the naming convention, e.g., Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (sportspeople).
To request a multiple page move, edit at the bottom of the talk page of the article you chose for your request, without adding a new header, inserting this code:
{{subst:requested move| current1 = Current title of page 1 (this parameter can be omitted for discussions hosted on a page that is proposed to be moved)
| new1 = New title for page 1 with the talk page hosting this discussion
| current2 = Current title of page 2
| new2 = New title for page 2
| current3 = Current title of page 3
| new3 = New title for page 3
| reason = Place here your rationale for the proposed page name change, referring to applicable naming convention policies and guidelines, and providing evidence in support. If your reasoning includes search engine results, please prioritize searches limited to reliable sources (e.g. books, news, scholarly papers) over other web results. You don't need to add your signature at the end, as this template will do so automatically.
}}
For example, to propose moving the articles Wikipedia and Wiki, put this template on Talk:Wikipedia with current1 set to Wikipedia and current2 set to Wiki. The discussion for all affected articles is held on the talk page of the article where the template is placed (Talk:Wikipedia). Do not sign the request with ~~~~, since the template does this automatically (so if you sign it yourself there will be two copies of your signature at the end of the request). Do not skip pairs of numbers.
RMCD bot automatically places a notice section on the talk page of all pages that are included in your request except the one hosting the discussion, to call attention to the move discussion that is in progress and to suggest that all discussion for all of the pages included in the request should take place at that one hosting location.
For multi-move discussions hosted on a page which is itself proposed to be moved, it is not necessary to include the |current1=Current title of page 1 for the page hosting the discussion, as its current title can be inferred automatically. Occasionally the discussions for significant multi-move requests may be hosted on WikiProject talk pages or other pages in Project namespace, in which case it is necessary to include |current1= to indicate the first article to be moved.
If you have to update a RM from a single move to multiple moves, you need to add the following parameters to the {{requested move/dated}} template call:
|multiple=yes
|current1=Current title of page 1
|new1=New title for page 1 with the talk page hosting this discussion
|current2=Current title of page 2
|new2=New title for page 2
|currentN=Current title of page N
|newN=New title for page N|}}
...where N represents more pages to be moved. Place a pipe ( | ) at the end just before the final set of braces ( |}} )
Please list every move that you wish to have made in your request. For example, if you wish to move Cricket (disambiguation) to Cricket because you do not believe the sport is the primary topic for the search term "Cricket", then you actually want to move two pages, both Cricket (disambiguation)andCricket. Thus you must list proposed titles for each page affected by your request. For example, you might propose:
If a new title is not proposed for the sport, it is more difficult to achieve consensus for a new title for that article. A move request that does not show what to do with the material at its proposed target, such as:
A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.
Use when the proposed new title is given. Do not sign this template—this tag is auto-signed when substituted. Be sure to use the subst:. This tag should be placed at the beginning of the section containing the relevant discussion.
A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.
Use when the proposed new title is not known. Do not sign this template—this tag is auto-signed when substituted. Be sure to use the subst:. This tag should be placed at the beginning of the section containing the relevant discussion.
A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.
This template adds subsections for survey and discussion. Do not sign this template—this tag is auto-signed when substituted. Be sure to use the subst: Click the "New Section" tab on the talk page and leave the Subject/headline blank, as the template by default automatically creates the heading.
It has been proposed in this section that multiple pages be renamed and moved.
A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.
Do not sign this template—this tag is auto-signed when substituted. Be sure to use the subst: and place this tag at the beginning of the section containing the relevant discussion. Add additional related move requests in pairs (|current3= and |new3=, |current4= and |new4=, etc.).
It has been proposed in this section that multiple pages be renamed and movedsomewhere else, with the names being decided below.
A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.
All editors are welcome to contribute to the discussion regarding a requested page move. There are a number of standards that Wikipedians should practice in such discussions:
When editors recommend a course of action, they write Support or Oppose in bold text, which is done by surrounding the word with three single quotes on each side, e.g. '''Support'''.
Comments or recommendations are added on a new bulleted line (that is, starting with *) and signed by adding ~~~~ to the end. Responses to another editor are threaded and indented using multiple bullets.
The article itself should be reviewed before any recommendation is made; do not base recommendations solely on the information supplied by other editors. It may also help to look at the article's edit history. However, please read the earlier comments and recommendations, as well as prior move requests. They may contain relevant arguments and useful information.
The debate is not a vote; please do not make recommendations that are not sustained by arguments.
Explain how the proposed article title meets or contravenes policy and guidelines rather than merely stating that it does so.
Nomination already implies that the nominator supports the name change, and nominators should refrain from repeating this recommendation on a separate bulleted line.
Do not make conflicting recommendations. If you change your mind, use strike-through to retract your previous statement by enclosing it between <s> and </s> after the bullets, and de-bold the struck words, as in "• SupportOppose".
Please remember that reasonable editors will sometimes disagree, but that arguments based in policy, guidelines, and evidence have more weight than unsupported statements. When an editor offers an argument that does not explain how the move request is consistent with policies and guidelines, a reminder to engage in constructive, on-topic discussion may be useful. On the other hand, a pattern of responding to requests with groundless opinion, proof by assertion, and ignoring content guidelines may become disruptive. If a pattern of disruptive behavior persists after efforts are made to correct the situation through dialogue, please consider using a dispute resolution process.
Relisting a discussion moves the request out of the backlog up to the current day in order to encourage further input. The decision to relist a discussion is best left to uninvolved experienced editors upon considering, but declining, to close the discussion. In general, discussions should not be relisted more than once before properly closing. Users relisting a debate which has already been relisted, or relisting a debate with a substantial discussion, should write a short explanation on why they did not consider the debate sufficient to close. While there is no consensus forbidding participation in a requested move discussion after relisting it, many editors consider it an inadvisable form of supervote. If you want to relist a discussion and then participate in it, be prepared to explain why you think it was appropriate.
Relisting should be done using {{subst:RM relist}}, which automatically includes the relister's signature, and which must be placed at the very end of the initial request after the move requester's signature (and subsequent relisters' signatures).
When a relisted discussion reaches a resolution, it may be closed at any time according to the closing instructions; there is no required length of time to wait before closing a relisted discussion.
If discussion has become stale, or it seems that discussion would benefit from more input of editors versed in the subject area, consider more widely publicizing the discussion, such as by notifying WikiProjects of the discussion using the template {{RM notification}}. Banners placed at the top of the talk page hosting the move request can often be used to identify WikiProjects suitable for notification.
Notes
↑A nominator making a procedural nomination with which they may not agree is free to add a bulleted line explaining their actual position. Additional detail, such as sources, may also be provided in an additional bullet point if its inclusion in the nomination statement would make the statement unwieldy. Please remember that the entire nomination statement appears on the list on this page.
↑Despite this, discussions are occasionally relisted more than once.
This section lists all requests filed or identified as potentially controversial which are currently under discussion.
Do not attempt to edit this list manually; a bot will automatically update the page soon after the {{subst:Requested move}} template is added to the discussion on the relevant talk page. The entry is removed automatically soon after the discussion is closed. To make a change to an entry, make the change on the linked talk page.
(Discuss) – 11 → 11 (disambiguation)11 (disambiguation) – In light of recent AFD's and merges, there is consensus that most years in classical antiquity are not notable enough to have standalone articles. Neither 11 BC nor AD 11 are notable enough to have standalone articles, and therefore cannot be considered primary topic. Same thing applies with 12 BC and AD 12, all the way up to 19 BC and AD 19. In addition, many of these numbers, including 13, 17, and 19, have either cultural or religious significance, so they can very well be considered primary topic. SVG-image-maker (talk) 21:36, 28 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – José Ramírez (third baseman) → José RamirezJosé Ramirez – José Ramirez is comfortably the most well known José Ramirez of them all. When someone searches for José Ramirez, they probably mean this guy. So if this move goes through, can we also move the José Ramirez page to José Ramirez (disambiguation)?. Sunshinezguy (talk) 19:37, 28 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – Diane R. Williams → Williams v. Saxbe – The subject of the article was the plantiff (and winner) in a landmark early sexual harassment case. It is also, judging by the article and a quick check, the subject's sole claim to notability as defined by Wikipedia. As the subject died in 2016, WP:BLP1E does not apply, but WP:BIO1E does. I believe the correct format here is for the article to be on the lawsuit, with Williams as a redirect to it. The BushrangerOne ping only 16:59, 28 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – VoteVets.org → VoteVetsVoteVets – Per WP:COMMONNAME and WP:CONCISE, unable to find any recent sourcing refering to the group as "VoteVets.org" over just "VoteVets". "VoteVets, a political organization dedicated to electing Democratic veterans and their relatives..."The Washington Post "VoteVets, the largest Democratic veterans group in the U.S., on Tuesday launched a new messaging campaign..."The Hill" "VoteVets also has served as a key outside ally to Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer..."The Gazette "...some ethics experts said that an organization as powerful as VoteVets could potentially eclipse the candidates themselves."The New York Times" "VoteVets is a major player in the Democratic primary space..."Punchbowl Newsमल्ल (talk) 16:13, 28 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – Dan Widdowson → Daniel Widdowson – I am the subject of this biography and would like to disclose that connection. I request that the article be renamed from "Dan Widdowson" to "Daniel Widdowson", the full name under which I currently work professionally. The article already introduces me as Daniel Widdowson. Australian Plays Transform (https://apt.org.au/author/?authorinfoid=1156) and Australian Christian College (https://www.acc.edu.au/podcast/daniel-widdowson/index.html) also identify me as Daniel Widdowson. "Dan" remains an alternative name associated with my earlier television career. I would appreciate independent editors reviewing this title change. ~2026-57242-63 (talk) 13:18, 28 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – Fuse (TV channel) → Fuse (TV network) – Better suited name, as a TV "channel" refers more to the channel number on a cable or satellite provider for a "network" (which is the brand identity or broadcaster of programming). OWaunTon (talk) 13:05, 28 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – Del Real Palace, Valencia → Royal Palace, ValenciaRoyal Palace, Valencia – The current name makes no sense mixing languages, like if the French referred to the Houses of Parliament as "Of Parliament Maisons". I propose "Royal Palace" as the simple English name, though it could also move to "Palau del Real" or "Palacio del Real". DougieMcC (talk) 20:34, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – Go-Coach → GoBus (Kent bus company) – Although the company's legal name remains Go-Coachhire Limited, it has been trading as GoBus for quite some time. Its website (www.gobus.uk) consistently uses the GoBus name and makes no mention of Go-Coach. I therefore propose moving the article to GoBus (Kent bus company), in line with WP:COMMONNAME, subject to the usage of the name in reliable sources such as their website. ThatNorthLondoner (talk) 17:45, 20 October 2026 (UTC) —Relisting.Thanks! —1isall(talk|contribs) 20:24, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – Scribd → Scribd, Inc. – Disambiguation between the company Scribd, Inc. and the product Scribd. Over the last few years, the company has restructured and is increasingly referred to as Scribd, Inc. in an official capacity. This 2026 article from Inc. Magazine details the restructuring and the four main products of the business. The company as a whole is also referred to as Scribd, Inc. in this 2026 article from Publisher’s Weekly. I work for Scribd, Inc. and have a COI so should not move this myself. Islewis (talk) 17:48, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – Tony Yang → Tony Yang (actor) – A long list of acting credits does not make a subject the primary topic of that name, as against other subjects sharing the same name with comparable achievements in other fields. BD2412T 16:50, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – Prince Ōtomo → Emperor KōbunEmperor Kōbun – I don't understand why Wikipedia is the only Wikipedia with the name "Prince Ōtomo" as the article title for this specific page. No other Wikipedia does this, to my knowledge, and for good reason: It's not his most common name. Since about 1870 he has been recognised as Emperor Kōbun and is listed as an emperor. This isn't an Empress Jingū or Princess Iitoyo situation. Kōbun is his correct, official name and he is recognised as such. Camillz (talk) 16:09, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – Board of Marshals → Wonsubu – The current title, "Board of Marshals", is inaccurate and ambiguous, and it is not the name used for this institution in reliable sources written in English. I propose moving the article to Wonsubu, the romanized name used in English-language scholarship, keeping "Board of Marshals" as a redirect, and giving "Supreme Military Council" in the lead as the most common English gloss. Detailed evidence is provided below. Kaito Akabane (talk) 15:29, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – KEZAD Group → Khalifa Economic Zones Abu Dhabi – The organisation's current official name since the 2022 merger of KIZAD and ZonesCorp, used in independent coverage. See also the earlier discussion "KIZAD, KEZAD, Kizad or Kezad?" on this page. KEZAD Group and Khalifa Industrial Zone would remain as redirects. I am a paid editor employed by Agency Helix FZ-LLC on behalf of Abu Dhabi Media Office (see my user page). Alec Howard (talk) 15:29, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – Quế Võ → Quế Võ (town)Quế Võ (town) – Per WP:VIETPLACE, there is only one existing administrative unit that has not been dissolved. I’m not sure whether the user has a good understanding of Vietnam’s administrative divisions, given that they keep changing article titles and incorrectly editing administrative types. “District-level town” and “township” are two different terms, although both are abbreviated as “town.” Following Vietnam’s 2025 administrative reforms, district-level towns were abolished, while townships were replaced by wards or communes. Thái Như (talk) 09:19, 20 October 2026 (UTC) —Relisting.Jeffrey34555 (talk) 15:01, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – AJWright → A.J. WrightA.J. Wright – Contemporary sources seem to spell the store's name A.J. Wright, with the "AJWright" stylization apparently being a short-lived change. See , , , et al. Ten Pound Hammer (they/them) • (What did I screw up now?) 04:25, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – Both Sides → Both Sides (album) – The is an EP called Both Sides. This move may be controversial. But if the move is unsuccessful, then we can make a disambiguation page of Both Sides. Harbordelsol (talk) 04:07, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – Taylor Heise → Taylor FoxTaylor Fox – Per WP:COMMONNAME. As much as I personally dislike it (As well as respect Taylor's decision), almost all sources reporting on her, her profiles are calling her "Taylor Fox", and she also goes by it on basically all her social media platforms (Except Facebook which I wouldn't be surprised if she barely touches and most of the content on her page is from her Instagram considering it is the preferred platform of her demographic): ,, , , , , , , . Only sources I found calling her "Taylor Heise" still: , . Servite et contribuere (talk) 00:43, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – Amiet market massacre → 2026 Amiet market attack – Move to standard WP:NCEVENT title. Alternatively 2026 Amiet market drone strike or something like that. Including year per WP:NOYEAR, as the event is too recent to evaluate in a "historical perspective" (in line with previous consensus for titling articles about recent events, e.g. this RM about the 2024 Kerman bombings). The usage of the current title would only be permissible as a WP:COMMONNAME, per WP:POVTITLE, but looking at the sources used in the article I see no evidence of that. The title should therefore be a WP:NDESC, and "massacre" is not considered a neutral descriptor (it is actually given as an explicit example of a non-neutral title at WP:POVTITLE). –Maltazarianᚾparleyinvestigateᛅ 17:33, 26 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – Palm (PDA) →? – Palm (PDA) is misleading as the product started as a PDA and later also included smartphones and then ended as smartphone only. Maybe a name like Palm (mobile devices) or Palm (product line) is best? Foneuservan (talk) 23:02, 14 October 2026 (UTC) —Relisting.–Maltazarianᚾparleyinvestigateᛅ 14:57, 26 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – Saskatchewan Progress Party → Saskatchewan Liberal PartySaskatchewan Liberal Party – This party was known as the Liberal Party of Saskatchewan Liberal Party from 1905 to 2023, during which time it formed the government on several occasions. It was only known as the Progress Party for three years, from 2023 until this month when it was deregistered by Elections Saskatchewan. It ran as the Progress Party in only one election and has never elected an MLA under this name. Under WP:COMMONNAME the name should be changed as the party was best known as the Liberals and going forward people will refer to the historical party as the Liberals, not the Progress Party. Wellington Bay (talk) 14:52, 26 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – Porpentine (game designer) → Porpentine Charity HeartscapePorpentine Charity Heartscape – Pretty cut and dried case here. Porpenine is not exclusively a game designer and has a full, unique name that precludes disambiguation. The original title was created before their full name was public as a second best option, it really doesn't need to be used anymore. Courtesy pinging @Zxcvbnm. Citrus🍋 14:18, 26 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – Ćaciland Protest Camp → ĆacilendĆacilend – Per WP:COMMONNAME. Nobody especially calls it "Ćaciland Protest Camp". Serbian sources refer to it as Ćacilend always while int'l sources seem to use both Ćacilend and Ćaciland. Jalapeño(user / talk / guestbook) 13:40, 26 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – Adéla (singer) → Adéla – Per WP:PT1 and the above, I think this is worth revisiting given that a) the last consensus was 15 months ago and she's had multiple international hits since, b) WikiNav says that about two thirds of the traffic from Adela goes to this page, c) Massviews shows that this page gets more than five times more views than any page Adela currently links to, and d) the previous consensus didn't consider any of the aforementioned and was formed when this article was getting less than a sixth of the views it is currently getting. Launchballer 09:33, 26 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – Mukundara Hills National Park → Mukundara Hills Tiger ReserveMukundara Hills Tiger Reserve – The article's scope has grown from the national park alone to the tiger reserve that contains it, and the official sources treat the reserve as the primary subject: * The national park covers 199.55 km²; the tiger reserve, notified on 9 April 2013 and enlarged in 2023, covers 1,135.787 km² (both figures as cited in the infobox) and includes the park, Darrah and Jawahar Sagar sanctuaries, part of the National Chambal Sanctuary and Bhainsrodgarh Sanctuary. * The NTCA brief note, the Management Effectiveness Evaluation 2022 and the 2022 tiger estimation all report on the tiger reserve as a unit. The infobox, the eco-sensitive zones, Management and Tigers sections now describe the reserve. * "Mukundara Hills Tiger Reserve" already redirects here; after a move, "Mukundara Hills National Park" would redirect to the renamed article, which would keep covering the park. Alternatively, if editors prefer to keep this article on the national park, a separate article on the tiger reserve could be split out. Spelling: official sources use both "Mukundara" and "Mukundra" (the Forest Department lists "Mukundara Hills Tiger Reserve" and "Mukundra Hills National Park"); I have kept "Mukundara" to match the current title. Disclosure: I made most of the recent content edits (see my user page). Comments welcome. Vinay.chittora (talk) 06:14, 26 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – Miles (disambiguation) → MilesMiles – The WP:PLURALPT argument for the current layout is fairly obvious, because mile is a common term with a primary topic. Nevertheless, Mediawiki doesn't let us distinguish uppercase Miles from lowercase miles. The lowercase miles is what qualifies for the plural primary topic, but the uppercase does not, as it is ambiguous with a common human names, Miles (given name) and Miles (surname), for which we have hundreds of biographies with a lot of usage and significance, so it stands to reason we'd want to help people reach those. --Joy (talk) 12:01, 14 October 2026 (UTC)—Relisting.Dekimasuよ! 05:31, 26 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – Moonchild (band) → Moonchild (American band) – There is a Japanese group called Moonchild and an American band called Moonchild. Band and group can be confusing words, so to list by nationality may be a good idea. Harbordelsol (talk) 05:01, 26 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – Scipione (opera) → ScipioneScipione – Was recently moved without discussion. A dab page was created with a bunch of people with the first name Scipione which violated MOS:DABNAME. I now moved those to Scipione (given name). There are three topics now at Scipione (disambiguation), however I think the opera, which is famous, is the primary. It far outstrips the other articles in terms of the volume of incoming links and should be put back as the primary article per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC.4meter4 (talk) 02:10, 18 October 2026 (UTC)—Relisting.Dekimasuよ! 04:57, 26 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – Oreste (Handel) → OresteOreste – Was recently moved without discussion. This is the only topic directly about Oreste other than Oreste (given name). None of the people with the given name are known just as "Oreste". Only the opera goes by that name, and it is a well known work. This is clearly the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, and a hat note can easily put down for the given name and per WP:ONEOTHER.4meter4 (talk) 15:06, 17 October 2026 (UTC)—Relisting.Dekimasuよ! 04:53, 26 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – Pentagón Jr. → Penta (wrestler)Penta (wrestler) – Pentagón Jr. was not used since 2017. He works for WWE, the largest promotion in the World as Penta, working at Royal Rumble and WrestleMania. While he has several names. Its pretty clear Penta is the common name for the page and progress to win championship now Money in Bank in 2026. Dumocrat (talk) 01:25, 11 October 2026 (UTC) —Relisting.Thanks! —1isall(talk|contribs) 02:37, 18 October 2026 (UTC) —Relisting.InfernoHues (talk) 02:43, 26 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – Alex Menzies → Alex Menzies (footballer, died 1990) – Well this one was a bit tricky to figure out when compared to the usual, both were Scottish and both were footballers. Okay easy, I’ll go off the birth year. Until I saw no year of birth! So I put when he died. Anyway, not sure if either is quite a primary. Sirlink2222 (talk) 00:56, 26 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – List of private military contractors → List of Private Military Companies – I believe this article should be titled "List of Private Military Companies." The linked "private military contractor" article in the introduction has already adopted C for Company, which is the most common and precise label. Private Military Contractor is imprecise because "Private Military Contractor" can refer to both an organization or an individual person (an employee of such an organization). Company makes it clear we are listing organizations. "Military contractor" is also a very broad term, so this list includes Raytheon and Northrup Grumman, which are not the same kind of organization as something like Wagner, Executive Outcomes, or Vectus Global. I think Raytheon and NG should be removed, but it is harder to justify that removal as long as this article is titled "contractors." I expect most readers of this article are here looking for Wagner-esque modern mercenary groups. NeonVanadium (talk) 23:16, 25 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – The Parting of the Ways → The Parting of the Ways (Doctor Who) – This is not the primary topic and a dab page should be created. Here, just for example, is a list of book with 'The Parting of the Ways' (or a close variant) in the title, all referring to Christainity and Judaism: *The Fiscus Judaicus and the Parting of the Ways *Parting of the Ways: The Variegated Ways of Separations Between Jews and Christians *The Parting of the Ways: The Roman Church as a Case Study *The Parting of the Ways: Judaism and the Rise of Christianity *Jews and Christians: The Parting of the Ways, A.D. 70 to 135 *Three Powers in Heaven: The Emergence of Theology and the Parting of the Ways *The Ways that Never Parted: Jews and Christians in Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages *The Ways That Often Parted: Essays in Honor of Joel Marcus The Doctor Who episode is not the primary topic. Srnec (talk) 20:00, 25 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – MotoGP Legends → MotoGP Hall of FameMotoGP Hall of Fame – The MotoGP Hall of Fame is now the most presitigious honor. Back then, MotoGP Legends is indeed synonymous to the HOF, but lately in 2025, they created a separate HOF, with those being honored as "Legends" now classified under HOF. The current "Hall of Fame" is more presitigious and exclusive; the "Legends" tag is just under the prestige of HOF. I don't think the Legends need a separate article though; it's enough for them to have their own section here in the HOF page (once moved).DieterLloydWexler 18:57, 24 October 2026 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). Thanks! —1isall(talk|contribs) 17:05, 25 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – Wessex → Kingdom of WessexKingdom of Wessex – This is both a move proposal and a split proposal, but as it's not possible to combine both of those into one proposal, I'm using the Requested Move template as it involves a move of this article. At the moment, this article is about two different things- the historic Kingdom of Wessex which existed from the 6th-10th centuries, and the general Wessex cultural region in the areas covered by the former kingdom. At the moment, this article (in the Wessex#Cultural and political identity in modern times section) states that the main article for that cultural region is Thomas Hardy's Wessex, but it isn't at all- that article is about the fictional literary landscape in Thomas Hardy's novels, and whilst Hardy's novels inspired the modern revival of the usage of the term "Wessex" in the region, there is a clear difference between a cultural region which exists in reality and the landscape of a fictional series with fictional place names. As a result, I'd suggest moving this article to Kingdom of Wessex to have an article that's specifically about the historic kingdom which ceased to exist in the 10th century, and then transferring the Wessex#Symbols and Wessex#Cultural and political identity in modern times sections of the article, both of which focus on the use of "Wessex" in much more recent times, into a new Wessex article to serve as a general overview article for the region throughout history. Chessrat(talk, contributions) 15:22, 25 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – Assimi Goïta → Assimi GoitaAssimi Goita – The article was disruptively moved without any consensus or discussion in 2020. Assimi Goita spells his surname without the French diacritic "ï", especially after Mali revoked French language's status in 2024. Assimi uses the spelling "Goita", not "Goïta" on his military uniform: 1, 2 etc. and also uses "Goita" his official X account. Pidgin Muivah (talk) 00:15, 5 October 2026 (UTC) —Relisting.Jeffrey34555 (talk) 03:44, 25 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – The Thing (character) → Thing (monster) – First, (character) is ambiguous as there are already two other articles about characters named "Thing" (Thing (Marvel Comics) and Thing (The Addams Family)), so it makes sense to further disambiguate. Second, per MOS:THETITLE, "The" should be dropped since the Thing is often referred to with a lowercase "the". Due to the fact that there are two changes in the title I am proposing, I'd appreciate if we voted the following ways: Support both, Support first/second and oppose second/first, and Oppose both. EDIT: Apologies in advance to whomever closes this request, I hope I am not making determining consensus difficult. ThePoggingEditor (talk) 18:37, 14 October 2026 (UTC) —Relisting.BD2412T 00:29, 25 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – BC United → British Columbia Liberal PartyBritish Columbia Liberal Party – BC United is now officially deregistered. As the party was known as the British Columbia Liberal Party for 120 of its 123 year existence and formed several governments as such, the name of this article should be changed back to that as it was the name that was predominantly used and is how the party will predominantly be referred to by historians. Wellington Bay (talk) 21:59, 24 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – Christkindlesmarkt, Passau → Christkindlmarkt, Passau – I can't find evidence that Christkindlesmarkt is used as a name for this market, either in German or English. Christkindlmarkt is the standard German spelling and used by the organisation itself so I think it makes sense to move it there. Asked the author if there's a reason for using this spelling on their talk page but had no reply. Blythwood (talk) 20:03, 24 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – Adolf I, Count of Mark → Adolf I of MarkAdolf I of Mark – As stated at WP:NCROY, For monarchs needing disambiguation, article titles are normally in the form "{Monarch's first name and ordinal} of {Country}". Examples: Philip IV of Spain; Henry I of France; Joan II of Navarre; Bohemond I of Antioch; Henry II of Champagne.Векочел (talk) 17:59, 24 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – Adalbert II, Count of Vermandois → Adalbert II of Vermandois – As stated at WP:NCROY, For monarchs needing disambiguation, article titles are normally in the form "{Monarch's first name and ordinal} of {Country}". Examples: Philip IV of Spain; Henry I of France; Joan II of Navarre; Bohemond I of Antioch; Henry II of Champagne.Векочел (talk) 17:58, 24 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – Ernest I, Landgrave of Hesse-Rheinfels → Ernest I of Hesse-Rheinfels – As stated at WP:NCROY, For monarchs needing disambiguation, article titles are normally in the form "{Monarch's first name and ordinal} of {Country}". Examples: Philip IV of Spain; Henry I of France; Joan II of Navarre; Bohemond I of Antioch; Henry II of Champagne.Векочел (talk) 17:57, 24 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – William IV, Prince of Orange → William IV of OrangeWilliam IV of Orange – As stated at WP:NCROY, For monarchs needing disambiguation, article titles are normally in the form "{Monarch's first name and ordinal} of {Country}". Examples: Philip IV of Spain; Henry I of France; Joan II of Navarre; Bohemond I of Antioch; Henry II of Champagne.Векочел (talk) 17:57, 24 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – Frederick I, Count of Celje → Frederick I of CeljeFrederick I of Celje – As stated at WP:NCROY, For monarchs needing disambiguation, article titles are normally in the form "{Monarch's first name and ordinal} of {Country}". Examples: Philip IV of Spain; Henry I of France; Joan II of Navarre; Bohemond I of Antioch; Henry II of Champagne.Векочел (talk) 17:55, 24 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – Bolesław I, Duke of Cieszyn → Bolesław I of CieszynBolesław I of Cieszyn – As stated at WP:NCROY, For monarchs needing disambiguation, article titles are normally in the form "{Monarch's first name and ordinal} of {Country}". Examples: Philip IV of Spain; Henry I of France; Joan II of Navarre; Bohemond I of Antioch; Henry II of Champagne.Векочел (talk) 17:54, 24 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – François I, Duke of Nevers → François I of NeversFrançois I of Nevers – As stated at WP:NCROY, For monarchs needing disambiguation, article titles are normally in the form "{Monarch's first name and ordinal} of {Country}". Examples: Philip IV of Spain; Henry I of France; Joan II of Navarre; Bohemond I of Antioch; Henry II of Champagne.Векочел (talk) 17:53, 24 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – John III, Count of Auxerre → John III of Auxerre – As stated at WP:NCROY, For monarchs needing disambiguation, article titles are normally in the form "{Monarch's first name and ordinal} of {Country}". Examples: Philip IV of Spain; Henry I of France; Joan II of Navarre; Bohemond I of Antioch; Henry II of Champagne.Векочел (talk) 17:49, 24 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – Robert I, Count of Conversano → Robert I of Conversano – As stated at WP:NCROY, For monarchs needing disambiguation, article titles are normally in the form "{Monarch's first name and ordinal} of {Country}". Examples: Philip IV of Spain; Henry I of France; Joan II of Navarre; Bohemond I of Antioch; Henry II of Champagne.Векочел (talk) 17:49, 24 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – Albert I, Duke of Saxony → Albert I of SaxonyAlbert I of Saxony – As stated at WP:NCROY, For monarchs needing disambiguation, article titles are normally in the form "{Monarch's first name and ordinal} of {Country}". Examples: Philip IV of Spain; Henry I of France; Joan II of Navarre; Bohemond I of Antioch; Henry II of Champagne.Векочел (talk) 17:48, 24 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – Odo I, Viscount of Porhoët → Odo I of Porhoët – As stated at WP:NCROY, For monarchs needing disambiguation, article titles are normally in the form "{Monarch's first name and ordinal} of {Country}". Examples: Philip IV of Spain; Henry I of France; Joan II of Navarre; Bohemond I of Antioch; Henry II of Champagne.Векочел (talk) 17:48, 24 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – Guihomar III, Viscount of Léon → Guihomar III of LéonGuihomar III of Léon – As stated at WP:NCROY, For monarchs needing disambiguation, article titles are normally in the form "{Monarch's first name and ordinal} of {Country}". Examples: Philip IV of Spain; Henry I of France; Joan II of Navarre; Bohemond I of Antioch; Henry II of Champagne.Векочел (talk) 17:47, 24 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – Alan I, Viscount of Rohan → Alan I of Rohan – As stated at WP:NCROY, For monarchs needing disambiguation, article titles are normally in the form "{Monarch's first name and ordinal} of {Country}". Examples: Philip IV of Spain; Henry I of France; Joan II of Navarre; Bohemond I of Antioch; Henry II of Champagne.Векочел (talk) 17:46, 24 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – Baadur I, Duke of Aragvi → Baadur I of Aragvi – As stated at WP:NCROY, For monarchs needing disambiguation, article titles are normally in the form "{Monarch's first name and ordinal} of {Country}". Examples: Philip IV of Spain; Henry I of France; Joan II of Navarre; Bohemond I of Antioch; Henry II of Champagne.Векочел (talk) 17:45, 24 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – Peter I, Count of Saint-Pol → Peter I of Saint-PolPeter I of Saint-Pol – As stated at WP:NCROY, For monarchs needing disambiguation, article titles are normally in the form "{Monarch's first name and ordinal} of {Country}". Examples: Philip IV of Spain; Henry I of France; Joan II of Navarre; Bohemond I of Antioch; Henry II of Champagne.Векочел (talk) 17:43, 24 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – Hilduin II, Count of Arcis-sur-Aube → Hilduin II of Arcis-sur-Aube – As stated at WP:NCROY, For monarchs needing disambiguation, article titles are normally in the form "{Monarch's first name and ordinal} of {Country}". Examples: Philip IV of Spain; Henry I of France; Joan II of Navarre; Bohemond I of Antioch; Henry II of Champagne.Векочел (talk) 17:42, 24 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – Hilduin III, Count of Montdidier → Hilduin III of Montdider – As stated at WP:NCROY, For monarchs needing disambiguation, article titles are normally in the form "{Monarch's first name and ordinal} of {Country}". Examples: Philip IV of Spain; Henry I of France; Joan II of Navarre; Bohemond I of Antioch; Henry II of Champagne.Векочел (talk) 17:42, 24 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – Louis I, Duke of Bar → Louis I of BarLouis I of Bar – As stated at WP:NCROY, For monarchs needing disambiguation, article titles are normally in the form "{Monarch's first name and ordinal} of {Country}". Examples: Philip IV of Spain; Henry I of France; Joan II of Navarre; Bohemond I of Antioch; Henry II of Champagne.Векочел (talk) 17:40, 24 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – John IV, Duke of Krnov →? – As stated at WP:NCROY, For monarchs needing disambiguation, article titles are normally in the form "{Monarch's first name and ordinal} of {Country}". Examples: Philip IV of Spain; Henry I of France; Joan II of Navarre; Bohemond I of Antioch; Henry II of Champagne.Векочел (talk) 17:39, 24 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – Engelbert I, Margrave of Istria →? – As stated at WP:NCROY, For monarchs needing disambiguation, article titles are normally in the form "{Monarch's first name and ordinal} of {Country}". Examples: Philip IV of Spain; Henry I of France; Joan II of Navarre; Bohemond I of Antioch; Henry II of Champagne.Векочел (talk) 17:38, 24 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – Henry I, Count of Sponheim-Starkenburg → Henry I of Sponheim-Starkenburg – As stated at WP:NCROY, For monarchs needing disambiguation, article titles are normally in the form "{Monarch's first name and ordinal} of {Country}". Examples: Philip IV of Spain; Henry I of France; Joan II of Navarre; Bohemond I of Antioch; Henry II of Champagne.Векочел (talk) 17:38, 24 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – Anthony II, Count of Ligny → Anthony II of LignyAnthony II of Ligny – As stated at WP:NCROY, For monarchs needing disambiguation, article titles are normally in the form "{Monarch's first name and ordinal} of {Country}". Examples: Philip IV of Spain; Henry I of France; Joan II of Navarre; Bohemond I of Antioch; Henry II of Champagne.Векочел (talk) 17:36, 24 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – Alternative for Germany → AfDAfD – As an English speaker, I've worked with many English-based news sources internationally doing reporting about the AfD in Germany. One example is the Frontline PBS documentary about the AfD, where they basically refer to it as "the AfD" throughout the documentary. I think "Alternative for Germany" is clunky because it's the awkward translation of a WP:COMMONNAME in another language, and I really don't think this should be the title for the English version of the article when the acronym is much more commonly used than the official translation of the name. According to the News on the Web (NOW) Corpus, from October 24 2025 to October 24 2026, the string "AfD" has been used 7041 times and the string "Alternative for Germany" has been used 1082 times. Alexandraaaacs1989 (talk) 16:52, 24 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – Sacred Name Movement → Sacred Name movement – I realize this is a relatively minor change but I think the capitalization of the current name could be understood as implying that this is a single denomination or organization of similar denominations. Some of the organizations more prominently associated with the Sacred Name movement have denied an association with it. I think writing "movement" in lowercase allows us to discuss it more as a general phenomenon. Theemausoliam (talk) 16:51, 24 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – Galfoy → MalfoidMalfoid – This page started out at Malfoid and was moved here on 16 October with no discussion and no edit summary (log). The account that moved it has since been blocked as a sock (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TotalTruthTeller24), so I'd treat this as restoring the original title rather than a fresh rename, but it's been sitting here for a week with an AfD running under this name, so I'm bringing it here rather than to RM/TR. On the merits "Malfoid" is plainly the WP:COMMONNAME. Of the sources cited in the article, Lifestyle.INQ, Cybernews, Indiatimes, Tuổi Trẻ and Creative Bloq have it in the headline or first line, and El Financiero and Azteca Puebla give it next to "Malfoy Girl". Know Your Meme, IBTimes and Just Jared use it as well. The only source I can find that says "Galfoy" is SlimePress, and even that one gives both. The section at Draco Malfoy is headed with both names, and the Malfoid redirect is still pulling 30–90 views a day, so it's what readers are actually typing. I expect the pushback will be that "foid" comes from incel slang. This is covered in the main section but WP:POVNAME is fairly explicit that where sources overwhelmingly use one name we follow them even if the name has a word we'd otherwise steer clear of. Tuổi Trẻ and Indiatimes both report that within the trend it's treated as a pun on the surname. "Galfoy" isn't a more encyclopedic alternative here, just a rarer one. The AfD is still open as I write this; this request is only about the title. QuillQuasar (talk) 08:17, 24 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – Wenhu line → Wenhu LineWenhu Line – Per OrdinaryScarlett's statement, let start the request move to let the "L" in "line" be capitalized. Firstly care about Taipei Metro and New Taipei Metro. "Line" is a part of the metro line name according to external sources and MRT official websites . Also, New Taipei Metro's "Danhai LRT" and "Ankeng LRT" are the official LRT line name. Thus, propose renaming these pages above. Sinsyuan✍️PJTW 08:01, 24 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – Ap (water) → Ap (word) – The parentheses are for disambiguation, not for translation of non-English words. — BarrelProof (talk) 21:45, 23 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – Oji-Cree → AnisininewAnisininew – I had previously WP:BOLDly made this move, but as it has been reverted by @162 etc.:, with them saying most sources seem to use Oji-Cree, I am opening an RM. I think the relevant guideline here is WP:AUTONYM, "Any terms regarded as derogatory by members of the ethnic group in question should be avoided." The text of the article describes "Oji-Cree" as offensive and "Anisininew" as preferred. James Hyett (talk) 19:50, 23 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – American Student Assistance → Britebound – The organization changed its name from American Student Assistance to Britebound in January 2026, and the article body already uses the new name. Per WP:NAMECHANGES, sources published since the change use Britebound. Details and sources are below. A technical request was declined in favor of a full discussion. I have a disclosed paid COI and will not close or move this myself. Lmnelson2802 (talk) 15:42, 23 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – 40th Golden Globes → 40th Golden Globe Awards40th Golden Globe Awards – The article's parent article (Golden Globes) got moved by RM and rightly so due to the wide adoption of the name from 2025 onwards. However, already completed editions before then were under the former name of the "Golden Globe Awards" that have articles here, but were moved (incorrectly) by the same editor who enacted the RM on the parent article. Intrisit (talk) 02:21, 16 October 2026 (UTC) —Relisting.BilledMammal (talk) 07:26, 23 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – 81st Golden Globes → 81st Golden Globe Awards81st Golden Globe Awards – This temporary account ~2026-51624-17 wants RMs enacted for some so-called "potentially controversial" but legitimate move reversals, stating that "a revert is clearly not uncontroversial", which is utterly gob-smacking! The editor (who fun fact was blocked twice for WP system gaming and disruption and has a history of barely gaining communal support for actions) enacted an RM to change the title of the parent article of the titles above to use its current name. After it closed as moved, the editor boldly (but incorrectly) moved these titles to have "Golden Globes" in them, despite the article contents, cited sources and official event posters in those articles showing otherwise. I can't fathom how controversial this is when the editor himself/herself is controversial, not to talk of his/her statements, pronunciations and actions. Intrisit (talk) 16:26, 14 October 2026 (UTC) —Relisting.BilledMammal (talk) 07:26, 23 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – Substitute good → Substitute goodsSubstitute goods – These came up on a related RM of Luxury goods → Luxury good, which was not moved (discussion). These appear to be exceptions to WP:SINGULAR as they are names of a class of object, Substitute good and Club good use the plural form in the lead titles, almost all of these use the plural form in their lead images, and the main topic of Goods uses the plural form as its name. I think these should be changed to plural form to keep things consistent. Umby 🌕🐶 (talk) 05:59, 16 October 2026 (UTC) —Relisting.BilledMammal (talk) 07:25, 23 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – Bilingual Review Press → Bilingual PressBilingual Press – (Note: I am a paid editor for ASU.) Bilingual Press, a publishing house that is part of Arizona State University's Hispanic Research Center, had been inactive since 2018 but is being reactivated. This appears to be its correct name and is the one used in the 2026 ASU News article announcing its return. Its name is technically bilingual ("Bilingual Press | Editorial Bilingue"), but that won't work as a title. Melted BrieASU (onward to victory · t · c) 05:20, 23 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – Coastal Wetlands of Togo → Zones Humides du Littoral du TogoZones Humides du Littoral du Togo – Moved to current title with rationale "in inglish [sic]". I can find no English-language reliable sources that use this name that show it is the WP:COMMONNAME; those referring to the Ramsar site use the French name. I would accept the argument that the topic of the article is the geographic region, not the specific protected area, in which case it should be moved to Coastal wetlands of Togo, but in any case, not stay at the current title. ~ A412talk! 03:50, 23 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – Pan Radio → SIM Radio – The radio station has officially rebranded from Pan Radio to SIM Radio under the same company (Panorama Press d.o.o.). Strumpfeta 2003 (talk) 13:47, 22 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – IT'SUGAR → It'Sugar – Wikipedia generally avoids all-caps promotional styling of article titles. This use of all-caps is purely promotional– not an indication of some abbreviation and not pronounced by spelling it out letter-by-letter. It's clearly intended to be pronounced like a word (or phrase). Several of the cited sources use "It'Sugar". Reading the Confectionery store article today, I also noticed that this source cited in that article uses the suggested styling as well. — BarrelProof (talk) 09:23, 22 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – BibleGateway → Bible GatewayBible Gateway – As seen in the website's own text, the name is now written as two words. The logo is the only element with the old spelling. 烤麵包機 (talk) 02:04, 22 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – Homo juluensis → Xujiayao hominin – The holotype (Xujiayao hominin fossils) of the proposed species Homo juluensis has been identified as a Denisovan through a 2026 proteomic analysis. It has already been proposed as a member of the Denisovan lineage in 2025 based on morphological similarities. Given that the Xujiayao hominin fossils will most likely be considered a part of the Denisovan lineage based on the available evidence, the taxonomic status of Homo juluensis will be in a flux, just like Homo longi (the Harbin cranium). As such I propose to move the page title as "Xujiayao hominin", since this phrase has been exactly used in the original description and subsequent studies. Junsik1223 (talk) 00:53, 22 October 2026 (UTC)
October 21, 2026
(Discuss) – Chris Commons → Chris Commons (long jumper) – I made a mistake earlier and can’t remove it, so here, I’m renominating it: Another one with no clear primary. Should become a disambiguation page Sirlink2222 (talk) 22:47, 21 October 2026 (UTC)
The 7-day listing period has elapsed. Items below may be closed if there's a consensus, or if discussion has run its course and consensus could not be achieved.
(Discuss) – Us Moderates → We Moderates – The current title "Us Moderates" is an ungrammatical, word-for-word translation of the Italian party name "Noi Moderati." In English, the pronoun "We" is grammatically required for a subject phrase like this. Moving the page to "We Moderates" corrects the grammar while providing a proper English translation for readers, aligning with Wikipedia's preference for accurate English styling. ALTERNATIVE PROPOSAL: If editors prefer to avoid English translation disputes altogether, I suggest moving the page to its native Italian name, **Noi Moderati**, which is widely used by international media and complies with Wikipedia's naming conventions for political parties (WP:NC-PL). Either option is vastly superior to the current ungrammatical title. Theescholar (talk) 21:53, 21 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – NBT Bank Arena → Utica Memorial AuditoriumUtica Memorial Auditorium – Per WP:COMMONNAME. This venue is more widely known as simply the "Utica Memorial Auditorium". It was called for more than 50 years, compared to the ten years that Adirondack Bank held the naming rights, or the ten years that NBT Bank will. If the sponsor names were common, they wouldn't need to call it the "Foo Bank Place at the Utica Memorial Auditorium". Apocheir (talk) 01:30, 11 September 2026 (UTC) —Relisting.BilledMammal (talk) 02:32, 18 September 2026 (UTC) —Relisted.P.I.Ellsworth,ed.–welcome!– 13:50, 11 October 2026 (UTC) —Relisting.NomanPK44 (talk) 19:13, 21 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – Mallorquín → Mallorquín (horse) – orCaballo Mallorquín or possibly Cavall Mallorquí. I don't believe there is a primary topic. Mallorquín means 'Mallorcan' in Spanish and is thus the name for many of the entries at Mallorca (disambiguation). I stumbled across this page looking for the article Mallorcan dialect. Source search is complicated by the overwhelming number of Spanish-language sources—mostly not referring to the horse—and people with the surname Mallorquín in Google Books and Google Scholar. Regular Google search results are mixed between the horse and the dialect. MallorcanMallorcan and MajorcanMajorcan are both redirects to Mallorca. Sentence case Caballo Mallorquín is probably justified per MOS:LIFE although it's a little unclear since the breed standard cited in the article is in Spanish, which uses sentence case. —Myceteae🍄🟫 (talk) 18:34, 5 October 2026 (UTC) —Relisting.Jeffrey34555 (talk) 20:55, 12 October 2026 (UTC) —Relisting.ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 02:01, 21 October 2026 (UTC)
(Discuss) – Arab raid against Rome → Muslim raid on Rome – I think the existence of the the Amazigh element is prooven in these raids, and the Islamic campaign in Southern Italy overall, that dosen't truly make it an Arab raid right?? As those raiders are actually unified by relegion more then race (which is also the cause why they are attacking Rome), i sggest that we change the title into what i proposed.
(Discuss) – UMM (União Metalo-Mecânica) → União Metalo-MecânicaUnião Metalo-Mecânica – This was moved back per a comment above in #Move discussion in progress. Procedural issues re improperly reverting the outcome aside, I disagree with the reasoning; the logic it is trying to use, that "UMM" is the actual name and "União Metalo-Mecânica" is a disambiguator, doesn't work. If that were truly the case, then the article would be titled UMM (factory) instead, however both this title and that hypothetical one run contrary to Wikipedia:Article titles#Avoid ambiguous abbreviations. And the argument proves too much - the vast majority of acronyms are ambiguous so that would apply to most of the cases in the mass RM itself; of the top 10 cases there AEC, BCR, CEB, DIPS, DOPE, FAR are all ambiguous so the title we moved away from could be viewed as having a disambiguator instead. In truth "Acronym (name)" is almost always "Name (disambiguation)", and the logic of that RM is a combination of Wikipedia:Article titles#Avoid ambiguous abbreviations, WP:NATURALDIS, and the fact that per WP:NCDAB disambiguators should be the generic class (avoiding proper nouns, as much as possible) that includes the topic, not an alternate name for the topic. And all of those principles apply just as much here. * Pppery *it has begun... 04:55, 11 October 2026 (UTC) —Relisting.Jeffrey34555 (talk) 03:10, 19 October 2026 (UTC)
.svg){kind=icon}
.png){kind=link}