This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared.
Wikimedia noticeboard for requesting protection of pages
Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection).
After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:ProtectedPages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to remove obvious vandalism.
Reason: A page highly susceptible to vandalism due to the highly contentious issue of the Constitutional Tribunal in Poland. Szturnek¿odp? 08:34, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Someone keeps adding information for a non-existant Year 3 when the game ceased development after Year 2. Visokor (talk) 08:36, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Can I please have my talk page protected for a week or two because I have seen an influx of Vandalism from my page Strongshorts (talk) 09:36, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Reason: The socks are back after the previous protection expired. Probably we need extended confirmed protection. Ymblanter (talk) 11:29, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – In the last few days, multiple temporary accounts have conducted vandalism on this page. GrinningIodize (you just lost the game) (talk) 12:35, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Like many aircraft fleet articles this one attracts its fair share of unsourced additions/changes. See all the TA's related to the latest editor ~2026-58033-59(talk·contribs). Thanks. 10mmsocket (talk) 13:14, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Edit warring, attempts of vandalism, additions of unreliable and conflicting sources that have been debunked. ~2026-57970-57 (talk) 13:36, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Disruptive editing to remove the basic genre for stop motion films, Failing AGF and using accusations at other editors in edit summaries. Halbared (talk) 13:39, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
This is part of a longer running conflict, where Halbared alleges a consensus and reverts every edit which removes "stop motion" from the first sentence of the lead without arguments: Talk:Wildwood (film)#"Stop motion" in lead
I am close on considering ths DND behavior. ~2026-42943-14 (talk) 18:09, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This article has constantly seen disruptive edits from IP editors, who typically change his year of birth to 1976. Several temporary protections have not stopped this. Roast (talk) 14:27, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Reason: vandalism and edit wars ~2026-57741-53 (talk) 15:03, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Extended confirmed–protectedfor a period of two weeks, after which the page will revert to its previous protection level if it is still in effect, or become unprotected otherwise. as disruption touches on KURD. The BushrangerOne ping only 21:22, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Disruptive edits made by multiple accounts to manipulate the content. Much of its well cited sources are removed by the multiple accounts in coordinated manner. Hence requesting to add protection of highest level possible. Adrikshit (talk) 15:17, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Request for temporary semi-protection of Pixxel
I am a disclosed representative of Pixxel and have opened a conflict-of-interest edit request on Talk concerning disputed descriptions of the company's nationality and corporate structure.
The article experienced multiple edits and reversions on October 30-31, 2026, involving its lead, legal-entity characterization, headquarters and corporate-structure statements.
I request temporary semi-protection, if administrators find that the editing pattern meets the protection criteria, to prevent further disruption while uninvolved editors assess the sourcing and establish consensus.
This is not a request to enforce the company's preferred version of the article but protection against active vandalism by parties that have something to gain by mischaracterising Pixxel as an American company despite ample public proof of it being otherwise. Spacecowboy742 (talk) 16:46, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Reason: High level of BLP violations and repetitive addition of facts from unreliable sources. May suggest pending changes protection. EvanTech10 (talk, contribs) ⚡ 16:58, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Page sources & more than half the content have been removed by a user who is after removing the sources requesting the page to be deleted due to "lack of sources/recognition" in an attempt to mislead reviewers. Please see the page history, I have attempted to revert the changes but the user again deleted half the page and claimed I have a COI even though I am not the page maintainer nor the creator, the page has been on wikipedia since 2011, I suspect the user doing these changes are due to religious discrimination in Pakistan against members of the Ahmadiyya community. FestusBashara (talk) 18:18, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Consistent vandalism by TA sock. Multiple TAs have vandalised this page over the past few months, making seemingly the same edits every time, thus making me believe that it is one person vandalising the ability of creating TAs here on Wikipedia. They are solely here to vandalise Wikipedia. ThatNorthLondoner (talk) 19:38, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Protection is no longer necessary as despite the books popularity, the authors page is barely changed and is not known to many people, and does not suffer from persistent vandalism. Most people can access information about him through his own website, thus, why I'm voting to remove semi-protection. 55618sh (talk) 18:56, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
The Houthis are currently listed twice, both as "Yemen (Supreme Political Council)" and as one of the constituents of the "Axis Of Resistance." Either "Yemen (Supreme Political Council)" or "Houthis" under "Axis Of Resistance" should be removed (preferably the former since the SPC has remained unrecognized internationally).
An alternative would be for "Yemen (Supreme Political Council)" under "Axis Of Resistance" and for "Houthis" to be listed under "Yemen (Supreme Political Council)." ~2026-51187-32 (talk) 01:19, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Congress has not even declared war. Nobody is at war. How can you even have an entire webpage using a term about an event that is totally inaccurate? Stop watering down terms and sensationalizing media terminology. Nobody is at war. It should be changed to conflict or something more suitable, but only Congress can declare war and that has never happened. ~2026-58034-72 (talk) 19:01, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Not done A lack of a declaration of war does not magically make something not a war. Also as reliable sources call it a war so must Wikipedia. - The BushrangerOne ping only 21:16, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
