Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Management

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion and merging of articles related to Management. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion
Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion and neither does removing an AfD from this page remove it from the main page at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
  1. Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
  2. You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:deletion sorting|Management|sig=~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.
Removing a closed AfD discussion
Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.
Other types of discussions
You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Management. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.
Further information
For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.


Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:
Purge page cache watch

Management

Vernon Systems

Vernon Systems (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is based on company profiles. There is no journalistic coverage that is required for WP:NCORP. Hitaki-oro · 🈳🉐 07:51, 9 November 2026 (UTC)

Muhammad Atif Sheikh

Muhammad Atif Sheikh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose draftifying because while I can see the subject being plausibly notable, the current state of the article is so promotional/resume-like that I think it should at least be draftified if not WP:TNT. Previous communication attempts with the page author about those issues and asking about COI hasn't been helpful. – TurquoiseGoose•they/them•(talk) 07:38, 3 November 2026 (UTC)

  • Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Politicians, Disability, Discrimination, Politics, Management, Pakistan, United Kingdom, and England. – TurquoiseGoose•they/them•(talk) 07:38, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
  • Comment: This title has been speedily deleted 3 times previously (A7 and G11 in 2017, G11 again in 2020), though I can't access the deleted articles to check how similar this is to them. It is also quite a while ago. – TurquoiseGoose•they/them•(talk) 07:45, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
  • Comment: I previously draftified this (that's why I didn't just go ahead and draftify it myself this time), then it was immediately moved back by the page author. – TurquoiseGoose•they/them•(talk) 07:52, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete or alternatively draftify. This article does not meet any of our guidelines for notability. Aneirinn (talk) 11:53, 4 November 2026 (UTC)

Tudor IT Process Assessment

AfDs for this article:
Tudor IT Process Assessment (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not seem to meet the WP:GNG. The sources certainly have WP:SIGCOV, but I doubt their independence. PhotographyEdits (talk) 08:20, 2 November 2026 (UTC)

  • Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Business-related AfD discussions. PhotographyEdits (talk) 08:20, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
  • Comment: the first nomination from 2015 ended with "no consensus" (nobody opposed deletion at all, but there was only one actual participant beyond the then-nominator), obviously not enough to resolve the tag for potential GNG failure that was placed around the same time. (No opinion.). WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:31, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
  • Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Management and Computing. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:32, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 (Ping me or else I won't see it) 11:35, 9 November 2026 (UTC)

John "Rambo" Stevens

John "Rambo" Stevens (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Zero notability outside of his association with John Lydon and notability is not inherited. Obituaries are not reliable sources and the other sources here are all about Lydon. A search brings up nothing but a few obituaries for Stevens, no other WP:SIGCOV whatsoever. Iggy pop goes the weasel (talk) 22:11, 26 October 2026 (UTC)

  • Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Management, England, and Tennessee. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 22:37, 26 October 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete. Wikipdia is not mémoire. Dylan Reed (Ping me) 14:22, 29 October 2026 (UTC) Keep per Dedaline and BBC source bellow. Dylan Reed (Ping me) 21:02, 4 November 2026 (UTC)
  • Weak keep - there are a couple of journalist-written obituaries. Bearian (talk) 02:38, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
  • Keep I believe this article merits retention under Wikipedia's General Notability Guideline WP:GNG. I would particularly challenge the suggestion that obituaries are not reliable sources. There is no general Wikipedia policy excluding obituaries as sources of significant coverage. The Times published a dedicated obituary of John Stevens on 20 December 2023. This is a substantial piece of independent journalistic coverage of Stevens himself, not simply a passing reference in an article about John Lydon.
Deadline Hollywood also published an independently authored report by Greg Evans on 12 December 2023, specifically about Stevens, his career and his work as a producer of documentaries concerning the Sex Pistols and Public Image Ltd.
It is true that much of Stevens's public profile arose from his long association with John Lydon. However, this does not automatically mean his own professional career is unworthy of an encyclopaedia article. He was a record producer, documentary producer and manager who played a significant behind-the-scenes role in the work and business affairs of two important British music acts.
His professional responsibilities are also documented independently, including in the 2021 High Court judgment in Jones v Lydon.
The dedicated Times obituary, the Deadline coverage and the independent documentation of his professional work provide a reasonable basis for retaining the article.
I therefore favour *Keep*, with any necessary improvements to sourcing and content. Peteinterpol (talk) 07:35, 1 November 2026 (UTC)

References

The Court case again deals with Lydon. Also I note WP:INVALIDBIO mentions person A has a relationship with well-known person B, such as being a spouse or child, is not a reason for a standalone article on A (unless significant coverage can be found on A); relationships do not confer notability. I'm still not seeing the WP:SIGCOV. Iggy pop goes the weasel (talk) 16:34, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 00:59, 3 November 2026 (UTC)

Management Proposed deletions

The following articles have been tagged for proposed deletion: