Wikipedia:WikiProject Technology/Assessment

WikiProject Technology

Project navigation

• Assessment
• Collaboration

Review

• Featured article candidates
• Good article candidates

Assessment

• Assessment template
• Quality scale
• Good article criteria
• Featured article criteria

Portals

• Technology

Notable areas

• Basic technology topics
• Technology topics
• Technology overviews
• Technology academia
• Technology glossary
• Technology portals
• History categories

The Assessment department finds technological articles and rate them on Quality scale.

The articles are rated by examining them and comparing them to the Quality scale. A template is then place on the article's talk page stating that the article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology and displaying what rating the article has been given when compared to the Quality scale.

• Éolienne Bollée
• Rosalind Picard
• UE Boom
• Error concealment
• Prusa i3
• Ethernet
• Stereolithography
• Incremental encoder -- please reassess due to major rewrite and content expansion
• OnePlus Nord
• Asus ZenFone 6
• Lorgnette -- please assess this stub, feel like it should be at least a start
• Nuclear weapon design -- I am uncertain what the procedure is in this project. Over on Military History I could just downgrade it myself, but I don't know what you project's rules are. Either way, the article may have been B-class when reviewed many years ago, but now it is a mess with 98 citation needed by my count today. It is also awkwardly structured. Over on the Military History project I am looking for other editors to help rewrite the whole thing.Kylesenior (talk) 05:08, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Cryogenic gas plant

Technological articles can be found in Category:Technology and its subcategories

• {{WikiProject Technology}}

	Technology FA‑class
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. FA This article has been rated as FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Reserved for articles that meet the featured article criteria and have received featured article status after community review

Featured articles are selected at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates

Reserved for articles that have received A-Class status after review by the project. Such articles are expected to largely meet the featured article criteria, and must be comprehensive, accurate, well-sourced, and decently-written.

A-Class articles are selected by the project at Wikipedia:WikiProject History/Review#A-Class Review.

Reserved for articles that meet the good article criteria and have received good article status.

Good articles are selected at Wikipedia:Good article nominations.

The article meets the following six criteria:

1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited.
2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies.
3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content.
4. It is free from major grammatical errors.
5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams.
6. It is written from a neutral point of view

Start class article have a few paragraphs that provide all the key points but may not cover all aspects of the subject. These articles usually have an image or infobox to support the text.

Start-class articles are selected by individual assessors.

Stubs are very short articles which offer a quick description of the subject

Stub articles are selected by individual assessors

• Extended reality (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t)
• Incogni (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Redirect-Class to Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)

• Ampace (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t)
• Eurotrac (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)

• Nonso Okpala (talk) removed.

• HD66 (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Why the Future Doesn't Need Us (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)

• Autographic printing (Pumphrey) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Digital Outdoor Menu Board (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:History of science and technology in Slovenia (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Six-port reflectometer (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t)

• Belt manlift (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)

• Straight-eight engine (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
• Worldtalk (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)

• Transcription machine (talk) removed.

• List of spaceflight launches in January–June 2025 renamed to List of spaceflight launches in April–June 2025.

• AltPNT (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t)
• Artificial intelligence art (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Redirect-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
• Crisper drawer (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
• NordPass (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)

• Biohybrid system (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t)
• List of spaceflight launches in April–June 2025 (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as List-Class. (rev · t)

• Prusa Research (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Schoolnet India (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)

• 1.58-bit large language model (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Fiction about transhumanism (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• GovPay (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t)
• Problems of Everyday Life (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Rami Malachi (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Shot peening of steel belts (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Technology companies of Palestine (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Truck scale (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t)
• Truck scale software (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)

• Savitech (talk) removed.
• Category:Transhumanism in fiction (talk) removed.
• Draft:Vortex electrowinning (talk) removed.

• Harmonization (standards) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Nous Research (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)

• Make in India (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from B-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)

• Category:Consent (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t)

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.

• VHS - Please assess this article for "B" grade. I've made some significant additions and changes. I think the article fulfills the criteria as a "B" article. Thank you! Groink (talk) 08:00, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Millenniata - Please assess this article for "B" grade. I rewrote it as NPoV. I believe the company itself is only notable for the M-DISC technology (a type of specialty DVD-R), but I'm not sure of the best way to handle that. Advice appreciated! —Hobart (talk) 01:44, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• I noticed that in Talk:Fucking Machines that this unfortunate article has a Good Article status from this WikiProject. This status needs to be reconsidered and likely removed. Rlsheehan (talk) 19:39, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]