DOBU was first described in the literature by Alexander Shulgin in 1970. Subsequently, it was described in greater detail by Shulgin in his 1991 book PiHKAL (Phenethylamines I Have Known and Loved).
Use and effects
In his book PiHKAL (Phenethylamines I Have Known and Loved) and other publications, Alexander Shulgin and colleagues stated that doses of 1 to 3mg orally produced clear threshold effects and that it was active at a dose of slightly more than twice that of DOM. It was stated that 10mg DOBU was required to produce hallucinogenic effects. The drug's duration was listed as "very long". There was limited investigation of its qualitative effects. However, in PiHKAL, at the assessed doses of 2.2mg and 2.8mg, it was described as producing paresthesia and difficulty sleeping with few other effects. The effects of higher doses of DOBU have not been described beyond them producing hallucinogenic effects.
DOBU fully substitutes for DOM in rodent drug discrimination tests, albeit several-fold less potently than DOET or DOPR. In addition, DOBU robustly induces the head-twitch response, a behavioral proxy of psychedelic-like effects, in rodents, and maximally does so about as strongly as other DOx drugs like DOM, DOET, DOPR, and DOC. The doses at which DOBU produces peak head twitches are similar to those of DOM and DOET.
Alternative skeletal isomers of DOBU can also be produced, where the 4-(n-butyl) group of DOBU is replaced with any of the three other butyl isomers, the iso-butyl, sec-butyl and tert-butyl compounds being called DOIB, DOSB, and DOTB, respectively. All are significantly less potent than DOBU, with DOIB being active at around 10–15mg, and DOSB at 25–30mg. The most highly branched isomer DOTB was completely inactive in both animal and human trials. However, it was also reported that DOTB and DOAM partially generalized to DOM in animal drug discrimination tests.
Chemical structures of DOBU and its skeletal isomers
DOBU was first described in the literature by Alexander Shulgin in 1970. Subsequently, it was described in greater detail by Shulgin in his book PiHKAL (Phenethylamines I Have Known and Loved) in 1991.
12345Shulgin AT (1978). "Psychotomimetic Drugs: Structure-Activity Relationships". In Iversen LL, Iversen SD, Snyder SH (eds.). Stimulants. Boston, MA: Springer US. pp.243–333. doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-0510-2_6. ISBN978-1-4757-0512-6. 3.4.10. 2,5-Dimethoxy-4-butylphenylisopropylamine The four-carbon homolog in this series, 2,5-dimethoxy-4-butylphenylisopropylamine (76, DOBU), appears in the animal behavior tests (see DOAM, 77) to be a highly potent compound, although somewhat less active than the three-carbon counterpart. The compound shows clear threshold effects in man in the 1-2 mg area, acutely and orally, and is effective at dosage levels slightly more than twice those required for DOM (69). It has been assigned (Shulgin and Dyer, 1975) a relative potency 36 times that of mescaline, although the qualitative nature has not yet been adequately investigated. As with the 4-propyl counterpart (75) there seems to be a sympathomimetic stimulatory component associated with the effective dosage.
12345Braun U, Braun G, Jacob P, Nichols DE, Shulgin AT (1978). "Mescaline analogs: substitutions at the 4-position"(PDF). NIDA Res Monogr (22): 27–37. PMID101882. Archived from the original(PDF) on August 5, 2023. TABLE II RELATIVE POSTENCIES IN MAN OF DIMETHOXYPHENYLISOPROPYLAMINE PSYCHOTOMIMETICS WITH VARIOUS SUBSTITUENTS ON THE 4-POSITION [...] Name: DOBU. Potency (total dose mg/man): 10 mg (e). Name: DOTB. Potency (total dose mg/man): >25 mg (d,f). Name: DOAM. Potency (total dose mg/man): 40 mg (e). [...] REFERENCES FOR TABLE II: [...] d. Shulgin, A.T., and Nichols, D.E. In: Stillman, R., and Willette, R. eds. Psychopharmacology of Hallucinogens. New York: Pergamon Press, 1978. e. Shulgin, A.T., and Dyer, D.C. J Med Chem, 18:1201, 1975. f. A > symbol indicates the absence of any activity at the stated dosage.
12Seggel MR, Yousif MY, Lyon RA, Titeler M, Roth BL, Suba EA, etal. (March 1990). "A structure-affinity study of the binding of 4-substituted analogues of 1-(2,5-dimethoxyphenyl)-2-aminopropane at 5-HT2 serotonin receptors". Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 33 (3): 1032–1036. doi:10.1021/jm00165a023. PMID2308135.
12Glennon RA, Young R, Rosecrans JA (April 1982). "A comparison of the behavioral effects of DOM homologs". Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 16 (4): 557–559. doi:10.1016/0091-3057(82)90414-2. PMID7071089.