| Clinical data | |
|---|---|
| Other names | UH232; (+)-UH-232; (+)-UH232; (+)-cis-5-Methoxy-1-methyl-2-(dipropylamino)tetralin; 5-HMDPTME; 5-Hydroxy-1-methyl-2-(dipropylamino)tetralin methyl ether |
| Routes of administration | Oral |
| Drug class | Dopamine D2 receptor antagonist; Dopamine D3 receptor weak partial agonist; Serotonin 5-HT2A receptor agonist; Hallucinogen; Serotonergic psychedelic |
| ATC code |
|
| Pharmacokinetic data | |
| Bioavailability | 3.7% (rats) |
| Metabolites | AJ-76 |
| Elimination half-life | 2.5 hours (rats) |
| Identifiers | |
| |
| CAS Number | |
| PubChem CID | |
| ChemSpider | |
| UNII | |
| ChEBI | |
| ChEMBL | |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | |
| Chemical and physical data | |
| Formula | C18H29NO |
| Molar mass | 275.436 g·mol−1 |
| 3D model (JSmol) | |
| |
| |
| (verify) | |
UH-232, or (+)-UH-232, also known as 5-hydroxy-1-methyl-2-(dipropylamino)tetralin methyl ether (5-HMDPTME), is a dopamine and serotonin receptor modulator of the 2-aminotetralin family which was under development for the treatment of schizophrenia but was never marketed. It is taken orally. Contrary to expectations, the drug did not end up producing antipsychotic effects in clinical trials. Instead, it was reported to produce stimulant, hallucinogenic, and psychosis-exacerbating effects.
UH-232 has been reported to produce stimulant, hallucinogenic, and psychosis-exacerbating effects in humans. The hallucinogenic effects of UH-232 have been reported to include "perceptual disturbances", "illusions", "aberrations of perception of auditory, visual and tactile stimuli", and "visual hallucinations". Based on preclinical findings, it has been theorized that the hallucinogenic effects of UH-232 may be due to serotonin 5-HT2A receptor agonism and hence that it may be a serotonergic psychedelic.
UH-232 is a dopamine D2 and D3 receptor antagonist or weak partial agonist. It shows about 3- or 4-fold selectivity or higher affinity for the dopamine D3 receptor over the dopamine D2 receptor (Ki = 4.2–11 nM and 15–40 nM, respectively). The drug is an antagonist at dopamine D2Sh autoreceptors on dopaminergic nerve terminals. It also interacts with the dopamine D4 receptor to a much lesser extent (Ki = 48–100 nM). The drug's activational efficacy is 16% at the dopamine D2 receptor, 16 to 40% at the dopamine D3 receptor, and 15% at the dopamine D4 receptor. However, it showed more than 1,000-fold lower activational potency at the dopamine D4 receptor than at the dopamine D2 and D3 receptors. It is said to be unknown whether UH-232 is a functional antagonist or partial agonist of the dopamine receptors in humans.
In addition to the dopamine D2 and D3 receptors, UH-232 shows affinity for the dopamine D1 receptor (Ki = 159 nM), serotonin 5-HT2 receptor (Ki = 118 nM), and 5-HT1A receptor (Ki = 144–168 nM). Its affinity for the serotonin 5-HT2 receptor is around 10-fold lower than for the dopamine D2 and D3 receptors. The drug has been reported to increase serotonin 5-HT2 receptor-mediated phosphoinositol turnover in fibroblasts transfected with the rat serotonin 5-HT2A receptor, suggesting that it may act as a serotonin 5-HT2A receptor agonist. Accordingly, UH-232 produced hallucinogenic effects in humans.
UH-232 produces hyperlocomotion (a stimulant-like effect) at low doses and mild hypolocomotion at high doses. It also produces weak stereotypies. The stimulant-like effects of UH-232 have been thought to be due to preferential dopamine autoreceptor antagonism and consequent disinhibition of dopamine release. However, they might also be related to postsynaptic D3 receptor antagonism. Another possibility is that serotonin 5-HT2A receptor activation may be involved in its stimulant-like effects. UH-232 produces synergistic and marked hyperlocomotion in combination with a subthreshold dose of the NMDA receptor antagonist dizocilpine (MK-801) in monoamine-depleted rodents, an effect that can be antagonized by dopamine D1 and D2 receptor antagonists and by the serotonin 5-HT2 receptor antagonist ritanserin.
UH-232 stimulates prolactin secretion in rodents. It has been found to antagonize the hyperlocomotion or stimulant-like effects of cocaine, dextroamphetamine, and apomorphine in rodents. The drug also antagonized their reinforcing effects in rodents. However, it did not antagonize the interoceptive effects of cocaine in rodent drug discrimination tests. In addition, it was able to partly substitute for cocaine in these tests.
The oral bioavailability of UH-232 is 3.7% and elimination half-life is 2.5 hours in rats.
In terms of chemical structure, UH-232 is a substituted 2-aminotetralin, cyclized phenethylamine, and partial ergoline.
The chemical synthesis of UH-232 has been described.

The N-monopropyl derivative (+)-AJ-76 is an active metabolite of UH-232 and has practically identical effects. Another analogue of UH-232 is UH-242 (5-HMDPT; 5-OH-MDAT). Other analogues of UH-232 include 5-OH-DPAT, 7-OH-DPAT, 8-OH-DPAT, DOM-AT, PNU-99,194, RDS-127, rotigotine, and UH-301, among others. In addition, UH-232 is structurally similar to the cyclized tryptamine and partial ergoline RU-28251 (4,α-methylene-DPT).
UH-232 was first described in the scientific literature by Arvid Carlsson and colleagues by 1986. It was developed by AstraZeneca. A clinical study of UH-232 for treatment of schizophrenia was published in 1998. It was also evaluated in healthy volunteers, in whom it unexpectedly produced hallucinogenic effects.
UH-232 was under development for the treatment of schizophrenia. It reached phase 1 clinical trials for this indication before development was discontinued. The drug did not improve symptoms of schizophrenia in a small trial. Instead, it appeared to exacerbate symptoms, including increasing unusual thought content, anxiety, activation, and hostility. Besides treatment of schizophrenia, UH-232 has been proposed for potential use in the diagnosis of early-stage Parkinson's disease.
These behavioral observations are consistent with reports of perceptual disturbances and even visual hallucinations when the drug was administered to normal volunteers (M. Larsson, personal communication). [...] (+)-UH232 has several other lesser affinities for cloned central nervous system system (CNS) receptors: 5HT2 (118nM), 5HT1A (144nM), and D1 (159nM) (R. Lahti, personal communication). [...] Further, (+)-UH232 shows an affinity for the 5HT2 receptor, although with only about 1/10 the potency shown for the D2-family receptors (K. Svensson and R. Lahti, personal communications). [...] In the monoamine-depleted mouse model, (+)-UH232 combined with a subthreshold dose of the selective N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonist MK801 produced a marked locomotor stimulation (Svensson et al., 1991). This response was blocked effectively and specifically by the highly selective 5HT2A antagonist MDL 100,907, supporting the interpretation that (+)-UH232 might possess 5HT2 receptor agonist properties (Carlsson, 1995). Alternatively, in in vitro studies, the Ki of (+)-UH232 at the cloned r5HT2A receptor in the presence and absence of GTP was the same. This provides no evidence for two sites, indicating that at this receptor, (+)-UH232 is an antagonist (R. Lahti, personal communication). On the other hand, (+)-UH232 has been found to increase 5HT2-mediated phosphoinositol turnover in fibroblasts transfected with the rat 5HT2A receptor, again suggesting agonist action (C. Schmidt, personal communication). [...] A similar picture has been observed in studies in human volunteers, in whom the signs of stimulation following treatment with single doses of (+)-UH232 were especially conspicuous (perception disturbances, hallucinations). In the present study on schizophrenic patients, signs of psychostimulation were evident. [...] While this constellation of actions might well account for the behavioral stimulation induced by this agent, one cannot rule out that the 5HT2 receptor stimulation suggested by the animal experiments referred to above has played a role.
(+)-UH232 was brought to clinical testing on healthy volunteers as well as schizophrenic patients, though only after single doses. In the former group the drug had some mixed actions with respect to mood and wakefulness. However, a rather striking effect was some abnormalities in perception observed in a number of individuals (illusions with a trend to hallucinations). In some of the schizophrenic patients the psychotic symptoms worsened. These effects may be due to 5-HT2-receptor agonist effects of (+)-UH232 [25]. In spite of this disappointing result it was felt that the pharmacological profile of (+)-UH232 was intriguing and clearly worthy of further exploration.
Likewise, MK-801, as well as the muscarine receptor antagonist atropine and the α2-adrenoceptor agonist clonidine, were found to interact synergistically with the putative 5-HT2 receptor agonist UH-232 to produce locomotor activation in monoamine-depleted mice. All these responses were effectively blocked by the highly selective 5-HT2A receptor antagonist MDL 100,907. [...] A finding of serendipity in this laboratory was that the selective DA D-3 and autoreceptor preferring antagonists UH-232 and A J-76 interact synergistically with MK-801 in monoamine-depleted mice (Svensson et al., 1991). This was an unexpected finding since these agents were assumed to lack direct agonist effects on postsynaptic receptors (Svensson, 1986). [...] prompted us to try selective 5-HT2 receptor antagonists like ritanserin and MDL 100,907. Our observations with these latter two compounds support the interpretation that UH-232 possesses 5-HT2 receptor agonist properties. [...] This conclusion is further strengthened by results from ligand binding studies carried out at the Marion Merrell Dow Research Institute (C Schmidt, personal communication) and the Upjohn company (K Svensson, personal communication) showing affinity of UH 232 for the 5-HT2 receptor. Moreover UH-232 was found to increase 5-HT2-mediated phosphoinositol turnover in fibroblasts transfected with the rat 5-HTzA receptor (C Schmidt, personal communication). Interestingly, when given to healthy volunteers, UH-232 has been observed to give rise to both behavioral inhibition and stimulation as well as aberrations of perception of auditory, visual and tactile stimuli (M Larsson, personal communication).
Other D2/D3 partial agonists that have been tested include UH-232, (-)-3-PPP, aplindore and bifeprunox. In one clinical trial, UH-232 was found to be devoid of antipsychotic activity but the interpretation of the outcome was complicated by hallucinogenic effects that were related to 5-HT2A-receptor agonism of the compound [16].
Intriguingly, (+)-UH232 actually worsened psychotic symptoms, perhaps via a combination of D3 and 5-HT2A agonism29,because 5-HT2A agonism is known to exacerbate psychosis62. [...] Two potential compounds were subsequently tested: (–)PPP and (+)-UH232 (a D3-preferring agonist with 5-HT2A agonism). [...]